Talk:Main Page

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Signature Size: anyone wanna give a second opinion?)
m (Reverted edits by 185.5.251.234 (Talk) to last revision by Gfdgsgxgzgdrc)
(includes 2057 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Main Page Talk}}
{{Main Page Talk}}
-
== TVTropes? ==
+
''It has been [[HRWiki talk:Main page redesign|suggested]] that the Main Page be redesigned. Feel free to use [[HRWiki:Main page redesign|its project page]] for proposed redesigns.''
-
Not sure the best place to put this, so I'll put it here.... since H*R deals with a lot of parodies and references to various TV tropes, could it be possible to have a quick link to [http://tvtropes.org TVTropes]?  That might help cut down on the "this reference could refer to this or this or [[TTATOT|that]]. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 23:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
+
== Featured content of the day (or whenever) issue ==
-
:We currently have no articles that have any links to TVTropes.org, so a quick link to it would be pretty useless. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::That's... not true... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::OK. But where are they? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::All over the place... i'd do a search, but google doesn't search the wiki code and the wiki search is ignoring "tvtropes" for some reason... The most recent one is a link put on [[Hremail 2000]]. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Well, I also just had done a search with Google to see if there were any links. That's why I thought there weren't any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I'm not a fan of TVTropes due to fact it's nothing more than "[[unnatural|an organized forum for people to shout out their ideas all at the same time]]". If it was actually organised, correctly formatted and thus readable, things would be different. I feel it would be more beneficial if we could find an alternative, well-written article about the relevant trope somewhere on the Internet, or even a Wikipedia article, if possible. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Hremails ==
+
I noticed that the trogdor 08 link to "watch" links to trogday.html, and not trogday08.html is this a known issue? {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 13:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 +
:Fixed. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
-
Instead of putting Short for these hremails, Can we actually put, like "Hremail: Hremail 2000"?
+
== Discussions ==
-
:"HREmail" isn't actually a category of toons as of yet, though. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::But it's not a short either... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::They're uncategorized, and there's no reason for us to categorize them until TBC have done so as well.  At the moment, they just reside in the New Stuff menu.  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::So why on the main page does it list them as shorts? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Couldn't we at least have some kind of navigation between the hremails?  Yes, they're not categorized, but they are obviously related.  --[[User:Son|Son]] 20:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I agree.--[[User:Crudely Drawn Cupcake|Crudely Drawn Cupcake]] 23:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::They are categorized on HSR.com, if you look under the toons menu, under new stuff, they have a little icon next to them that says "HSE" which stands for Homestar Email? Since the SBEmails have "SBE" next to them? Maybe? Dunno... --[[User:WillowDrake|WillowDrake]] 5:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
+
There are a lot of talk page discussions happening on this wiki. The problem is, this wiki is not very active, so such discussions rarely get consensus and very few things get done. (That's why I'm {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Links&diff=777176&oldid=777175 always}} {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Puppet_Character_Variations&diff=prev&oldid=776839 reviving}} {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Homestar_Runner_20th_Anniversary_Show&diff=prev&oldid=775801 old}} {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Teenage_Variation&diff=prev&oldid=776233 discussions}} with a phrase like "I still agree with this.") I think there should be some way to keep track of all the ongoing discussions. Maybe a <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Discussions]]</nowiki> page or something to keep these discussions from becoming inactive. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 01:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
-
:::::::That's not categorized. all toons have three characters next to them like that. Categorized means put into one of the toon categories. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
+
:I still agree with this. <small>(See? That proves my point!)</small> {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
-
::::::::Now that there's a handful of Hremails, I think it's reasonable if only for our own convenience to group them all together. Which is why I did so a couple of days ago. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
+
::I also agree with this. <small>(You have a good point!)</small> {{User:Minecraft lover147/sig}} 04:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 +
::There's [[HRWiki:Open Discussions]] - not really active, but since it's directly linked from The Stick it could be revived easily. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
-
== Signature pictures ==
+
== Aquabats Kickstarter Cameo ==
-
How do I put one of those pictures when I sign things?--[[User:Mariofan1000|Mariofan1000]] 21:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
+
Homestar Runner makes an appearance in this Aquabats Kickstarter video
-
:For that, you'll need a signature. Please check [[Help:Signature]] for how to create one, but make sure it follows the [[HRWiki:Signature|guidelines]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Former Featured Articles ==
+
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbfRQBFC3hk&t=0s]
 +
{{unsigned|108.54.219.151|20:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)}}
-
In wake of the fact that [[Fourth Wall Breaks]] and [[Nintendo]] need cleanup and [[Date Nite]]'s Commentary Transcript has been left incomplete for nearly 2 years now, should I make a template and a category for Featured Articles that no longer deserve such titles?  I already have some gewd ideas for template pictures. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 18:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+
== February 21? ==
-
:Off the top of my head I'd say no. Once featured, always featured. But to get a better idea, you should elaborate on what the wording of the template would be and what image we should use. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Wording would basically explain that the article needs improvement before it can once again "highlight the fine work of the Wiki", and the picture would be the pumpkin pie (unless the "worst" ribbon is too harsh, then it will be Strong Sad's Self Portrait in Late October).  If that's too similar to the cleanup template, it could be invisible like {{t|no-image}}.  I just think we need to separate articles that no longer highlight our fine work from those that do. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 18:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Like, cough cough, history according to strong bad? -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34|132.183.138.34]] 20:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::It's not very clear to me what's wrong with that article. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 20:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Featured articles here are not like those at Wikipedia. At Wikipedia, saying an article is featured means it's considered one of the encyclopedia's finest articles, and therefore those that fall below this standard end up getting de-featured. Here, it just means we thought it was cool enough to put on the Main Page. There's no need to consider an article de-featured here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::As a side note, lack of a commentary transcript is not enough to deprive an article of its awesomeness. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 10:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Why... ==
+
Why does the Main Page say that the newest Skills of an Artist was released on February 21 when it was released this month? [[Special:Contributions/76.184.27.104|76.184.27.104]] 20:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 +
:My bad. I probably copy-pasted it when updating and forgot to change the date. Thanks for bringing it to my attention~  --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
-
I've always wanted to ask this, but why do we spend hours a day working on improving articles when almost 10% actually ''read'' the articles?? I guess it's good for something like a youtube video or something like that but is there some wiki inspector that comes along some time in 2009 that we're preparing for? Or is this all just for fun? Just asking. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
== Two Questions ==
-
:Ten percent of what? A far greater number of people read the articles than edit them, and even longtime editors still read articles for enjoyment. I myself read the [[4 Gregs]] article just yesterday and learned some very interesting tidbits. The bigger answer lies in the answer to "Why does one climb a mountain?" Because it's there and it's fun and challenging to do well. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Ask not what the wiki can do for you, but what you can do for the wiki. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Put simply, we have way too much time on our hands. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Typo ==
+
{{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Jurvy-Skat&curid=18745&diff=777714&oldid=777337&rcid=740575 These}} {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Peasant%27s_Quest_Preview&curid=890&diff=777715&oldid=777710&rcid=740576 two}} edits raise two questions concerning [[HRWiki:Standards|wiki standards]].
 +
:''See [[HRWiki talk:Standards#Linking to articles with disambiguation in the page title|HRWiki talk:Standards → Linking to articles with disambiguation in the page title]]
 +
:''and [[HRWiki talk:Standards#Retroactive names in transcripts|HRWiki talk:Standards → Retroactive names in transcripts]]
-
but it isn't always clear whether or not the Dennis mentioned is '''reffering''' to the same Dennis in Thy Dungeonman.
+
== Some questions we would like to ask about... ==
-
'Refferring' should be spelled 'referring.'
+
-
:Fixed. Thanks. =) --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Whatever happened to '''be bold''' and have fun? Or was that changed to '''cower down to the sysops and beg not to be blocked'''? =3 {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, the [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 8|featured article template]] is semi-protected, after all... Anonny: For future reference, if you [[Special:Userlogin/signup|create an account]] (and wait a day or so to be autoconfirmed), you'd be able to edit the FA writeup yourself, and fix any typos... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 22:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::The annony was referring to the actual ''page,'' which is '''not''' semi-protected. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::The relevant wording from the featured write-up is identical to the sentence in the article itself. There's no way to know for sure which one he meant, but it's more likely that he was intending the more visible and difficult to edit featured blurb. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Bots ==
+
Hi there, I'm a stranger who wants to ask you some questions.
-
If a regular user like me was skilled enough to have a bot and it was only used for good, will it be blocked? --[[User:Fangoriously|Fangoriously]] 02:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
+
1) When will ALL the old Flash pages turn to HTML5?
-
:Yes, it would be blocked. See [[HRWiki:Blocking_Policy#Bots]]{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Why would a good bot that works be blocked? --[[User:Fangoriously|Fangoriously!]] [[User talk:Fangoriously|Chat]] 00:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Because that's what we have users for.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 03:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Or, if we really do need the services of a bot, it's why we have developer-controlled bots. We actually have one bot, [[User:First Time Here?|First Time Here?]], that comes into play just about every day. Out of curiosity, what do you think we need a bot to do? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::There's also [[User:The Cheatbot|The Cheatbot]], which does sophisticated [[HRWiki:WikiGnome|Gnome work]] so that the wiki worked more smoothly. However, it has not been active since 2 June 2008. I wonder why? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 11:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Yes, I'm aware of my own bot. The Cheatbot is active only when duty calls, and currently there are no pending approved projects. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Tandy game ==
+
2) When are you going to UNBAN IP addresses who "committed" persistent vandalism?
-
What did the "Tandy game" page look like before it was baleeted? --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 17:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
+
3) If Flash is dead, are you going to cancel HomestarRunner.com ?
-
== 1.14 Upgrade? ==
+
4) Why wouldn't we see ANY updates from 2011 to 2014?
-
I've noticed that MediaWiki 1.14 (non-rc) has been out for three days now, and it seems that [[Special:Version|we haven't upgraded]]. Just a note. --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66|69.150.85.66]] 22:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
+
5) Could y'all please tell us what email The Brothers Chaps have?
-
:Three days? Wow, that would be extremely ambitious considering all of the customizations we make to the software, not to mention the fact that we developers have day jobs. Ever since we began doing upgrades the way we currently do, our record for upgrading after an official release is just under two weeks, set back when 1.8 was released. In all other cases it's taken us around two or three ''months'' (and that's not even counting the fact that we completely skipped 1.7, 1.10, and 1.13). With each upgrade, I have refined the process so that I have less to do each time (for example, by moving things out of the core code and into hooks, or by submitting a patch so that a custom feature or fix becomes standard), but some things are just intricate and have to be done manually (like autopipe). I had been making preparations in advance of the official 1.14 release, so hopefully it won't take too long, but just in case you weren't planning on keeping your pants on, I'd advise you do so. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== New Page Suggestion ==
+
--[[Special:Contributions/83.185.35.154|83.185.35.154]] 18:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 +
:1) We don't know. Ask [[the Brothers Chaps]].
 +
:2) Never. Why should we?
 +
:3) You'll have to be more specific as to what that means exactly. We aren't involved with homestarrunner.com, so we can't take down someone else's website. And The Brothers Chaps are planning to give the site a HTML5 update, so they won't take it down.
 +
:4) Kids, creative burnout, side projects, etc. See [[HRWiki:Hiatuses]] for more details.
 +
:5) Their email address used to be brotherschaps@homestarrunner.com, but it was removed from the site's [[Email]] page, so it seems [[@StrongBadActual]] is now their primary contact method.
 +
:Hope this helps! {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
Hey, is there/should there be a page listing all the times that Characters imitate other Characters? Like Strong Bad imitating Homestar on Marzipan's answering machine, Homestar imitating The Cheat in Do Over, etc. etc. What do you think? (I know about the "be bold" thing, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask someone else's opinion =P)
+
::Concerning the answer #2, why never? --[[Special:Contributions/83.185.35.154|83.185.35.154]] 22:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
And, for future reference, is this where suggestions for new pages are supposed to be made? If not, where?
+
:::To reduce the risk of a repeat offender. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 23:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
~ [[User:Branewashed|Branewashed]] 12:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+
::::THAT repeat offender is way worse than CE5, aren't we right? --[[Special:Contributions/83.185.35.154|83.185.35.154]] 23:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
:A page like [[Impersonations of Other Characters]]? Which we've had for 3 years? And there isn't really a set place for new page suggestions... this is probably as good a place as any. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+
:::::Look, I'm not sure what your issues are, but the simple truth is that the best thing for you to do is behave like someone who has never even heard the name "Maudi Algabban" (we are not fooled, we know who you are) and has literally zero curiosity about the name or the user's history, while also showing no particular interest toward all the things you show far too much interest over (such as the Pyongyang reference, the hiatuses, and the possibility of homestarrunner.com being taken down) and never, ever, even for a moment, even consider writing loud yelling, swearing posts demanding people unblock you and give you answers to questions we have no way of answering. Also, make constructive Wiki edits (that means not vandalism, with or without scare quotes), not just Talk page chatter. Basically, you need to start over completely and pretend you are not and were never you and do not care about you - and that doesn't mean to insult yourself, it means ''do not mention'' yourself. You've built up far too much bad karma, so it's very likely that even the slightest hint that you are you will be treated with immediate suspicion, and likely result in further blocks. And if you think this is unreasonable, perhaps what you really need to do is to find a way to end your obsession with this Wiki. You've been pulling these bizarre stunts for literal years. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
::As a matter of fact, yes, a page exactly like that...Yeah. Sorry 'bout that. Ok, so this can be ignored. =P Thanks! ~ [[User:Branewashed|Branewashed]] 12:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::No problem, glad i could help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Emoticons? ==
+
::::::I must tell you all that I'm NOTHING but a stranger, but if you would like to send some ANGRY emails to him, his email address is ''-redacted-'' . Maudi MUST be punished and he's WAY the worst contributor on Homestar Runner Wiki! LET'S GET HIM!!!! --[[Special:Contributions/83.185.35.154|83.185.35.154]] 23:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 +
::::::: *sigh* I tried. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
-
Are emoticons unique enough to deserve their own page?  Off the top of my head I can think of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 12]], [[original]], and [[Hremail 62]] as examples. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 03:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
+
== Netiquette w/r/t interviews on defunct sites ==
-
== Self-linking image ==
+
As I [[HRWiki:WikiGnome|clean up]] various pages on the site I'm finding that many cited interviews and links are dead and gone.
 +
:''See [[HRWiki talk:Standards#Interviews on defunct sites|HRWiki talk:Standards → Interviews on defunct sites]]''
-
[[Image:WTC.png|thumb|How the crap is this possible?]]
 
-
As you can see, this particular image links to itself on its "links" section. Why/how does it do that? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:It's because of the {{t|notorphan}} template. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 02:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::But how? {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::Here's why:  The template has the following code: <code><nowiki><includeonly><span style="display:none">[[Media:{{PAGENAME}}]] <!-- to take the image off [[Special:Unusedimages]] --></span></includeonly></nowiki></code>.  It's a hidden link back to the image itself so that it doesn't show up in [[Special:Unusedimages]]. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 03:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::Sorry, that's my picture. When I saw how TBC edited the picture I submitted, that put a tiny little damper on my jovial spirit. I then created my account pretty much for the sole purpose of showing that picture to the world. But, pictures don't go too well on the fanstuff page, so it just has an irregular sort of link. I guess that's why this tag is here. {{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::There wasn't any particular conflict with your image, it was just the first one that came to mind that had that template. Nice use of legos, BTW. ;) {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
== Email ==
+
== https ==
-
Is it really necessary to put "email" in front of every Strong Bad email name on pages with bulleted lists? Like when it says "Email [[crying]]" on the [[Li'l Brudder]] page. --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 17:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+
Hi! Can you make this site secure please, https. Thanks kindly!
-
:Yes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Why? --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 17:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::I'm sure we could do without the word "email" being before every SBEmail title, but since so many articles currently have the word on them, it would be easier to just not do anything about it than to change every article. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 18:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::I always thought we had "Email" before each name because it doesn't have any captial letters so it doesn't look like a normal toon title. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Fanstuff Wiki Forum ==
+
:: ?
 +
:::I have literally no idea what you mean by that. -[[Image:Baby strong bad.png|20px]][[User talk:Minecraft lover147|<span style="color:#00ab33;">Minecraft</span><span style="color:#734e00;"> lover147</span>]] 04:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
-
Where is it? [[Special:Contributions/72.129.20.89|72.129.20.89]] 02:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
+
==YouTube channel?==
-
:http://z13.invisionfree.com/Fanstuff/ &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
+
Maybe you could consider adding the HomestarRunner YouTube channel to the new content watchlist, since that's where TBC seems to be doing most of their work, now?
-
::Where's the Fanstuff Wiki? HUH? '''HUH!?''' I want the HRFWiki back!! --Homestar tiger
+
-
:::It's still under construction and may remain that way for quite some time. However, you can post fanstuff at above forum, as well as at a whole number of different H*R related fansites. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::That's good. I've always said that fractions and fanstuff don't mix. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Green ==
+
ToaJuaraevo01(Forgot how to sign)
 +
::To sign, just put four tildes after your post (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>). {{User:Lira/sig}} 16:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 +
:::If you just want your name, like this:[[Image:Baby strong bad.png|20px]][[User talk:Minecraft lover147|<span style="color:#00ab33;">Minecraft</span><span style="color:#734e00;"> lover147</span>]], you just put 3 tildes after your post (<code><nowiki>~~~</nowiki></code>). If you want to do your name ''and'' the time, do the aforementioned 4 tildes. To do ''just'' the time, like this: 05:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC), do 5 tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki></code>).
 +
:::<small>This post has been posted by [[Image:Baby strong bad.png|20px]][[User talk:Minecraft lover147|<span style="color:#00ab33;">Minecraft</span><span style="color:#734e00;"> lover147</span>]]. The time it was posted is 05:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC).</small>
 +
:I disagree. YouTube is really more of a dumping ground for all the old Flash stuff that is still available on the site, but might not be should the Flash plug be pulled. And though I prefer to avoid YouTube, I don't think the Homestar Runner YouTube channel has been updated in months. [[website|Because YouTube is a place where absolutely nothing happens]]. I would mention that most new content is now posted on Twitter, but much of it doesn't qualify as full toons that demand full attention. (This may change, but not in the foreseeable future). -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131|68.37.43.131]] 13:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
-
All that green hurts my eyes. --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 20:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
::There actually is SOME original content on there, if you bother to look. {{User:ToaJuaraevo01/sig1}} 04:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
-
:I fixed it some. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 20:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
:::What exactly do you mean "new content watchlist"? YouTube-exclusive content is already listed and documented in numerous places. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 07:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
-
::TURN IT BACK! MAKE IT LIGHTER! This dark green is boring --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 20:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::seriously. We should be able to have it normal. {{User:Raiku/sig}} 21:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Why? It's cool and it makes Dot Com's Sig green.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 22:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::It's just a little fun for a day (actually an extended day, since we have users in places around the world where it's already tomorrow), and if it's not your style, don't worry, everything will be back to normal soon enough. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 23:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Green fine! Just lighter! No dark! --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 01:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Is this the first year we've done this? I can't recall it in years past. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 01:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::We did it last year also. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::You missed the point. I just want the green to be lighter green. --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 02:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::He wasn't responding to you, he was responding to my question. And to be perfectly frank, I think that a lighter green would only make pages harder to read and harder on the eyes. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Yeah, he could make it a little lighter because you can't read the text on some user pages like [[User:ThePizz|The Pizz's]] userpage.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 02:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::User pages aren't a priority. What's important are the articles, and the darker green makes those easier to read. We did do something like this last year, but it was only on the main page. This is the first year that it's been sitewide. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 03:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:I love it. This is awesome. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I love how any time a site changes, people complain. It's like this on facebook also. It's only a small change people, and unlike facebook, it's only going to be like this for a day or so. If you don't like it, don't come to the site for the next few hours. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::That's uncalled for. If a whole lot of people really had a problem with it, then it would indeed be appropriate for them to voice their concerns here so it could be addressed. (Fortunately, it seems like one isolated case.)&mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 04:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::If it was a permanent change, i'd agree. Since it's very temporary, i think people can just suck it up for a day. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::See, there again. You're complaining about people who are not complaining.&mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 05:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::Well then... I stand complained about... or something. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::In case my comments were misinterpreted, I think this is totally awesome. HRWiki oughta do stuff like this for more holidays, although I assume it's a bit of a hassle for developers and such. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Glad to see all the rest of you guys joining the green signature crew! {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Well, my "Talk" link was already green, so it's not like it was that much of a reach. :) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 05:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Wow, you Americans really are crazy about St Patrick's Day. Anyway, this sudden colour change got me thinking; is it possible to program into Preferences the ability to change the default colour in which users see the links? That way, you could have everything in green throughout the year! Or any other colour you'd like! Each user would be able to further customise their account, aside from changing the skins. I remember that you did just this with the TaviStyle skin after THAT April Fools incident. And I think you would still be able to override everyone's settings on holidays if you really wanted to. (Speaking of which, I just hope this year you aren't going to change everything to white. That would just be annoying.) {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:There's no need to put it into preferences, just change your own monobook.css. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::... What's a "monobook.css"? Does it have something to do with those Greasy Monkey scripts I've heard about? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:[edit conflict] To change the color of the links you see, add the six lines from the group at the bottom of {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.css&diff=636313&oldid=631951 this edit}} to your personal style page. If you use MonoBook, then that page is located at [[Special:MyPage/monobook.css|User:Your Username/monobook.css]]. '''Note:''' you should leave out the "!important" tags unless it doesn't work without them, otherwise you won't see anything special when we celebrate other days. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 18:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Thank you, It's dot com! It seems a bit difficult to do though, because you need to know the special codes for each colour you want. I just wondered whether it was possible to develop an easier interface for those who don't know much about coding, but then, due to the complete and utter irrelevance of changing the link colours, it's probably not really worth worrying about. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::You don't necessarily have to put a specific color number. I could have used "<code>color: green</code>" if I'd wanted, but I was going for something more specific. There are also online tools that can help, and any image editor worth its salt can tell you the hex value of a color. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|<span style="color: #070; text-decoration: underline">It's dot com</span>]] 20:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::I personally like this green, as it's my favorite color. Check out my green siggy! Am I in the green sig club now? By the way, you can go [http://www.colorschemer.com/online.html here] for a graphic of the colors and their codes. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 20:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I don't have a green sig. Is that okay? --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 21:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::That's not really what this is about, but sure. It's okay. {Pat on head} {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Like Heimstern, I don't have to do a thing to my sig because it's been green for months now. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 21:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::My sig is bi-polar, and proud of it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 22:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Now that you mention it, some of my ancestors were [[Wikipedia:Orange Institution|Orange Irish]], and some were... Green Irish? I guess? So... --[[User:Jay|<span style = "color: #669966">''J</span><span style = "color: #FF8800">ay''</span>]] [[User talk:Jay|<small><span style = "color: #006633">(Ta</span><span style = "color: #FF8800">lk)</span></small>]]
+
-
::::::::::The green took a while to get used to, but I ended up liking it, especially since it saved me the trouble of making a St. Patrick's Day signature. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 05:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
==the or The?==
+
== Redesign ==
-
I've noticed that there has been a bit of inconsistency regarding the capitalization of the word "the" in character's names (The Cheat, The Poopsmith, The Umpire, The Grape Fairy, etc.).  So I ask you, are there any established rules about this?  Are certain characters' the's supposed to be capitalized, while some are not? [[User:Omnisweater|Omnisweater]] 14:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Not counting things like the beginning of a sentence, the only time an article in or before a name should be capitalized is when it's consistently shown to be an [[integral article]]. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Mysterious red border ==
+
I was just looking at the [[HRWiki:Main page redesign]], and it had something entitled, "On this day..." for H*R stuff that happened on that day in history. I like the idea of that, but when I looked on it, it had stuff for February 9th. Where I live, it's still February 8th. I know this wiki is centered around UTC, but it could be very confusing for someone who ''doesn't'' know that. -[[Image:Baby strong bad.png|20px]][[User talk:Minecraft lover147|<span style="color:#00ab33;">Minecraft</span><span style="color:#734e00;"> lover147</span>]] 04:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
-
Today, I noticed that there was a red border around the HRWiki. Actually, it seems to load last and resizes the entire wiki within the border. Has anyone else had this problem? I couldn't find any discussion about a background change, so I'll assume that isn't what is happening. I can provide screenshots if that would help. &mdash;{{User:Mibluvr13/sig}} 06:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
+
==Sick Homestar, BRAH==
 +
Why is homestar sick looking on the main page button? Found no other place to post this question --[[User:Jeffjman|Jeffjman]][http://www.scratch.mit.edu/users/jeffjman][[File:Baby_strong_bad.png‎|30px]] 16:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 +
:World events, Jeff. World events. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 +
::How long exactly will the COVID-related logos continue to show up? It's been long enough now - if it was even necessary in the first place. Yes, we get it. Current events, the end times have almost come, we almost danced the Conga of the Apocalypse, etc. We get that. I think everyone who visits this wiki is aware of that by now. I think we'd all be aware of that ''even if'' this wiki's logo didn't shove it in our faces every few page loads (though I do appreciate that it is no longer EVERY page load like it was at first).  And I don't think any of us like being reminded of it - especially not this long after the fact. I'm sure most of us visit this wiki to take our minds ''off'' of the bad news for a while, not to be reminded of it by the logo. But it's your call, I suppose. I do hope I'm not coming across as rude - I just want to give my two cents on the matter since no one has brought up this point of view yet. [[Special:Contributions/76.184.23.181|76.184.23.181]] 01:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 +
:::What's funny is I agree with you—it ''has'' been long enough now, and ''I'' don't like being reminded of it, either. In fact I came this close to taking it down completely a couple of days ago, but I stopped myself. It just didn't feel right, since this mess is still very much not over. But I toned it way down (btw, the most it has ever appeared is on half of all page loads; now it's on a twelfth). If you'd like to eliminate it completely, you can of course create an account and then set whatever logo you like on your user CSS page. As you mention, no one else has brought up this point of view yet. If they do, I'll reconsider whether it's time to take it down altogether. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 +
::::1) You have no idea how relieved I am to hear that you agree with me for the most part! :)
 +
::::I apologize if I came across as preemptively defensive earlier. I'm not the best at wording, so I was gulp-afraid of saying the wrong thing and being misunderstood... that's happened to me a lot, especially in discussions about this pandemic. (Which is the major reason for me not liking to be reminded of it too often if possible.)
 +
::::2) Oh yes, I do remember that even in the beginning it wasn't on every page load. I think I initially assumed it was on only certain pages or something. And I did notice that it wasn't appearing as frequently lately, but I wasn't sure if that meant it had been toned down or was just a coincidence (at one point I even thought it was finally gone). Once every 12 page loads is acceptable, especially now that I know I'm not the only one who's tired of it. ;)
 +
::::3) I didn't know it was possible to change the logo on my user CSS page. I don't have a lot of practice with CSS but I might give it a try. Thanks for letting me know!
 +
::::4) I suppose it should be mentioned: technically I do have an account here, that I made when I was about 14 or 15. Same with the forum. But I've haven't been to the forum in years and have barely used the wiki account - instead, I mostly just browse the wiki, and, on VERY rare occasions, post on talk pages. Every once in a while I think about logging in and making contributions more often and becoming a regular user (after all, I read talk pages more than the average non-contributing user does, and several times I've thought of edits I could make), but... I said a LOT of dumb things on the forum back in the day, and my wiki and forum usernames are similar, so I cringe thinking about the possibility that people might still remember all of that. One of these days I'm going to see if I can still log in so I can change my username.
 +
::::[[Special:Contributions/76.184.23.181|76.184.23.181]] 07:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 +
:Turns out the coronavirus doubles as a computer [[virus]]. {{User:The thing/sig}} 20:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
-
Umm, I don't have any red borders. {{User:Ugozima/sig}} 22:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
+
== What's new correction ==
-
:I work for a service called ChaCha which has a Greasemonkey script that places a red border around all Wikis to remind me that I'm no supposed to use them as sources. Do you have something similar installed?{{User:Bassbone/sig}} 02:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
+
The "What's New" should have the Fan Costumes from Thanksgiving at the bottom. [[User:Wolf O&#39;Donnel|Wolf O&#39;Donnel]] 03:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
-
::Wow, that's specific and accurate. Forgot I installed that... &mdash;{{User:Mibluvr13/sig}} 14:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
+
:I think whoever edited What's New last opted to take the Fan Costumes out instead, because the Halloween toon is a bigger, more significant update. The importance of updates should be considered alongside their recent,,,ness. A big toon should take priority over a short, and so on. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
-
:::For the record, I think our wiki would be an excellent secondary source to quickly lead you to the appropriate primary source on H*R, and for things they don't archive (weeklies), it would be a good primary source. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
+
::I did that. I was under the impression that the box was meant to primarily show the updates on the site's "what's new" button. The Halloween toon is there, while the Fan Costumes is not. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
-
::::Of course, Dot com. In my year of ChaChaing though, I unfortunately have yet to get a question about Homestar. &mdash;{{User:Mibluvr13/sig}} 01:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
+
:::A good rule of thumb is that we should list everything within the last month and anything that's still in the What's New button, and if we still have space to fill, we can include older things that you can actually watch, like toons. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 14:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
-
== what's with the ads? ==
+
== Site on the fritz ==
-
I thought this was an ad-free site. Now I have to enable my adblock. Thanks a lot, people wh didn't donate. *cough cough* --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 04:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
The wiki has been taking an age to load lately. Is there something amiss or do just that many people wanna know what the crap Bod is? [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 12:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
-
: Hey, you can't really blame me. I was unemployed for most of the donation time. Blame it on all those employed people we get at the Wiki. You know who you are, all three of you! (Well, okay, I'm employed ''now'' but my finances are still low from the fact that I was unemployed for so long.) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 04:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
:Yeah that happens sometimes, especially when there's a new toon. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
-
:: I know. I can't believe they didn't donate. Well, I didn't either, but I'm 12. Soooooo. {{User:Ugozima/sig}} 05:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, at least it's better than last year's April Fools' gag... --I slayed the Kerrek. Really. 06:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::What are you talking about, Emily. I looked at [[Special:Scramble/virus|last year's gag]] the other day, and it still cracks me up. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 06:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::These are the worst ads ever. I mean, you can't even click on them and get bombed with spyware/adware! What kind of ad service are you guys running? And where's the "Taser the Gnome for Low Rates" ad?!? Those ad banners with minigames rock! -{{User:YK/sig}} 07:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::We're workin' as fast as we can. You have to understand, this is a long process in setting up these ads (since we never had them before), so some may not be at full functionality yet. We'll be getting more as the day wears on, as we find more sponsors. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 07:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Aw man, I thought i wasn't gonnna have to use my adblocker on this site.:(--{{User:Record307/sig}} 13:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::My only complaint about the ads is NOT BIG ENOUGH.  If I don't have to look at the page source to read an article, then the ads aren't covering up enough of the text.<!--Seriously though, nice job!--> {{User:Trey56/sig}} 14:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::I don't know if this is relevant, but I don't really like what happened to the forum because I have to click "select all" ''every'', ''single'', ''time'' I open a new page.  I like the banner and the knowledge base's ads though.  Did you get the idea from the second post on the second page of [[Forum:15104|this thread]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Wouldn't be much of a prank if it was convenient for you, now would it. To answer your question, no, I did not solicit ideas from the forum. Any resemblance is coincidental (plus we were bound to eventually do this <s>gag</s> real thing that we're really doing from now on). &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::The only thing that annoys me is that they're all gifs. Couldn't they at least have been made jpgs? If i'm going to have items forced on me by a 3rd party, I'd at least like a full color palette! <silent lawls>
+
-
::::::::::::Why aren't there ads for real Homestar merchandise? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 19:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::We may indeed do a couple of those, but I think the other ads are funnier. To the anonny: None of them are GIFs. They're all PNGs. Most (but not all) of them are paletted to keep the filesizes down. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:on my computer, sometimes the ads appear to the left of the page. {{User:The thing/sig}} 20:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
where do i get those stuffs i try to click on them and it dosnt do anything -awesome
+
== History preservation ==
-
:As I said above, this is a long process in setting up these ads (since we never had them before), so some may not be at full functionality yet. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::o so i wait for a little? -awesome
+
-
Seriously though, why DOESN'T this website have ads? That just seems silly to me, having to raise like two thousand dollars a year.
+
-
:Because ads are awful. They're intrusive and annoying. Having ads means we no longer control the look of our site. Also, TBC have stated how much they hate ads, and we agree. Please feel free to toss five bucks our way. Every little bit helps. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Agree with everything Dot com said. 'Sides, we use Firefox plug-ins a lot around here; our subtitles script relies on one. Guess what one of the most popular Firefox plug-ins removes from pages. Go on, guess. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:I especially like the really big ads! Like the Sog Dog ones and stuff! Nice woik! {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 22:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Is there a list of all the ads being shown here? I want to make sure I haven't missed any :P [[User:InsanityBringer|InsanityBringer]] 23:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Not yet, but there will be later. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Ha! Seeing the Suudsu add here reminds me that I've really got to make up a glass of that to try someday. Anyway, I'd love a list of all the possible ads. I wouldn't want to miss one! {{User:Bubs 20X6/sig}} 01:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
Could you keep the pages for the stuff that will be removed from the website in 2021 (e.g. games, character videos, etc.) on the Wiki, so as to preserve the history of the website? (That "Mashed Potato Jones" comment from "Halloween Fairstival" and other stuff that was changed should be kept on the Wiki, too)
 +
:Has there been any announcement indicating that content will be removed from the website?  I believe individuals have made content archives and projects such as [[Wikipedia:Lightspark|Lightspark]] should allow such content to remain playable after flash's EOL. So we should be ok? Still I haven't seen any notice of content deletion as of yet. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
-
Okay, these ads are really starting to get on my nerves. they should at least be the same size so the page loads the same way every time. That would make them more reasonable. oh, and if you're gonna beat me up, make it quick. i've got a full agenda today. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
== Remove [[FeedBurner]] from the main page ==
-
:Your signature is really starting to get on my nerves. It should at least have the same space between each line. After all, ''reasonable'' is the name of the game on a day like today. Incidentally, just how full could an agenda be with only 35 minutes left before midnight? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::What i actually meant was, that's why i haven't been on earlier in the day. and perhaps i should make those horns a bit smaller. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::done -the knights who 'til recently said ni 03:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::I was just parodying your comment. ;) The different and obnoxious sizes were intentional. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Understood, i just wanted to have a chance to use the ridiculous signature more than i did. now i'm getting what i can out of it. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 04:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== [[Sbemailiarized Intro]] Mirror Required ASAP ==
+
If we're not doing a main page redesign in the near future, could we at least replace the link to [[FeedBurner]] with [[@StrongBadActual]]? It's where updates really happen now. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 07:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 +
: I agree with Elcool. Which is why I decided to '''be bold''' and make the exact update he suggests. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 10:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 +
::A '''bold''' edit? on the '''''Main Page'''''?!?!? :O Awesome! {{User:Elcool/sig}} 12:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 +
:::'''NOTE:''' ''I've updated the redesign discussion [[HRWiki_talk:Main_page_redesign#Recent_update|here]] in response to this update.'' --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 19:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 +
::To Elcool, Jay, and the rest of the sysops (and the greater wiki community at large): '''I would greatly appreciate everyone's feedback on if and how to move forward with the main page redesign!''' This is another thing that has stalled for years and I think even small changes would be helpful.  However, changes for the main page need to begin with sysop and admin participation!  Thanks! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 13:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
-
The [[Sbemailiarized Intro]] has been removed from the website. It is currently impossible to watch this toon. We need to upload a mirror ASAP. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
== Flash archive preservation ==
-
:Done. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Fanstuff??? ==
+
What are we going to do with the wiki's flash archives? We need to preserve the old content, and there isn't any sign that the brothers chaps will post them on youtube.
 +
:[[https://twitter.com/StrongBadActual/status/1343723058289373184/photo/1 They've got their top man on it.]] And we got all the files backed up here so if needed we can run our own legacy player for stuff like [[Where the Crap are we?]] or worst case scenario, beg Newgrounds for their player. [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 00:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 +
:And just like that, they've unveiled a new HTML site that runs Ruffle for the old crap! I already found two Easter eggs! [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 01:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
-
Why haven't you put up the new fanstuff wiki??? :s I'm waiting for it to come. The 10th stinkoman level wont come i think. ADD THE FANSTUFF! {{User:POM Z/sig}} 6:26. 3 April 2009 (UTC)
+
== Some sbemails redirect to the wrong ones. ==
-
:I'd check out [[User talk:It's dot com#Fanstuff_wiki|this]] discussion if I were you. In short, the Fanstuff wiki will likely be up whenever its reconstruction is complete, and I'd advise you to [[Not the 100th Email!!!|keep your pants on, for real]]. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Why should we keep our pants on?! It's been '''224 days'''. We were pretty much told it would be a weekend, week tops. Instead, we are left with the cruddiest knockoff wikis, that none of the "greats" attend, that was actually initially intended for crap overflow, and a forum which is getting more and more tedious and restless by the second. People are jumping ship, and the latest April Fool's just made people realize how hopeless everything was. Imagine if the same thing happened to you guys, here at HRWiki. You'd be angry, wouldn't you?! It's as if we're a little joke to you guys. What is wrong with you people?! -[[Special:Contributions/24.20.249.36|24.20.249.36]] 05:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
As an example: [[1 step ahead]] redirects to sbemail 29 if you take the link to http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail28.html {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 08:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 +
:Sounds like a redirect bug to me (or similar). It could be noted in the [[Post-Flash Site Update]] page. But more importantly TBC should be made aware of this so it can be fixed. Not sure what the best way to do that is, I don't think they have a 'report site problems' link or similar. Oh, I guess there's also twitter! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 08:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
-
You know, I really didn't want to complain about this, but I thought there was something I'd bring up. A 17 year old guy who runs his website from his house can upgrade to the new Mediawiki in a day, but I don't even know if the upgrade for the fanstuff (which has been going on for months now) has even STARTED. I don't have all the facts on this, I don't know what the admin's lives are like, but I'd just like to know, what is going on. I thought a purge, stripped down, was just going in, deleting all the crap, and opening it back up. The reason it was closed off was to make renovations, and I assumed that would take a few days, tops. Is there something technical I'm missing, something I don't understand? Does anyone want to explain it to me, or the many others who are in the dark on what exactly happens when a website is purged? I mean, a few updates here and there would be nice, I didn't think it'd be too much trouble to maybe update the fanstuff with a message saying "my dog is sick, purge delayed", or "purge take few more month, virus, marriage, other stuff", I just want some updates. What I don't want, are little cartoons that joke around about how long the whole thing's been taking. I can't even comprehend how long this has been going on, I mean, it's just unbelievable. I used to spend my life over on that wiki, checking it, talking to friends, writing emails. But now, me and many others are just losing the will to write, to animate, to draw, to spend precious time, 224 precious days waiting for a website to come back, just so we can have fun again. {{User:NachoMan/sig}} 06:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
== Index page seems to be missing from the Main Page ==
-
My turn for a rant, I suppose. I won't waste eloquence on this, because honestly I think we're all wasting our time complaining anyways. This wiki should never have to have so many longtime users upset about ''anything'', let alone something that if I understand correctly, can be easily remedied by even small updates, or some indication that ''something'' is happening (Or why something isn't happening). No one would have been for this purge if we knew it would take the better part of a year of waiting. We don't appreciate the lack of communication to the users (whether or not there's more communication with the higher-ups, I don't know, but I doubt), although I'm sure this pestering isn't a thrill either. I'm sure more regular updates, instead of the nearly non-existant, sporadic updates we have been getting, would stop most, if not all, of this pestering. I'm past wanting the purge to be over immediately; I can wait longer. I just want to know what is or is not going on (Of course, we will expect something to be going on, unless there are extenuating circumstances). I think I speak for the remaining users at the Fanstuff when I say that we want our wiki back, but if that's not possible yet, we at least want to know why. [[User:Cheatachu72|Cheatachu72]] 06:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
The title says it all: every since the [[Post-Flash Site Update]], it seems the [[Index Page]] has risen to prominence a bit more than before. It should probably be included in the Main Page as well! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 09:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 +
:I see this a lot. Why do people say that the title says it all and then go on to say more things? Anyway I added the index page to the main page. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 +
::That is a ''very'' good question!  I had never thought of that before. I almost didn't put the phrase in, but I still felt like it should go there. People are riddled and mired in contradiction. That's the only thing that comes to mind. Also, thank you very much for adding the link! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 13:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
-
If you have a reason for not putting the fanstuff wiki back, just tell us. Trust me, I'd rather never have the Fanstuff wiki again and have a reason for it than sit here without it questioning what the crap is going on. Really. It's been long enough. --{{User:Color Printer/sig}} 19:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
== Breaking tradition ==
-
:Look guys, I'm not saying I'm satisfied with the service we're getting either. While I didn't edit on the fanstuff all that much, I loved reading some of my favorite entries, and the forum just doesn't cut it as a replacement. Believe me, I feel your pain. But I think sticking the blame on the administrators isn't the right way to go. These people are admins for a reason, and it's discouraging that the new wiki isn't up yet, but ranting about it won't help anything. They likely have their reasons, and if you ''really'' need to get to the bottom of this, you can contact them in a more constructive way rather than just shouting on the Main Page talk. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 16:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
Twice, I've come across [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Eggs_(disambiguation)&diff=prev&oldid=804774 edits that] [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Pink_Pants!&diff=prev&oldid=805372 go against] tradition. I'm fairly certain we have never had a disambiguation with a non-name-matching entry or a categorised redirect, and I also don't understand the sudden acceptance for them<!--not unlike the sudden like for clones in Smash Bros. when certain ones were given an official name-->. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-
::Really, I'm the only one who's shouting. [[Special:Contributions/24.20.249.36|24.20.249.36]] 17:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
:Tradition for tradition's sake isn't necessarily a good thing. If all decisions were made purely based on precedent, nothing would ever change. Also, since these edits have been made, they are no longer unprecedented. When these precedents were established is irrelevant; what matters is whether these practices should continue based on their own merits.
-
:::I'm going to wait a little while to archive the main page, until this discussion is closed once and for all. Truthfully, I don't care much for the fanstuff wiki, and it doesn't effect me if the wiki ''never'' comes back, but I am curious on why this is taking about 2 thirds of a year. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 17:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
:The first is more common than you think ([[Haunted House]], for instance, has no links with "Haunted House" in the title). The content of the page is just as relevant as its title, so I see no reason to enforce such a restriction. I can imagine a user looking for the sbemail about eggs, and visiting that disambiguation for help finding it.
 +
:I'm more conflicted on the second thing. I can see the benefits, but to me, a categorised redirect is an indication that either the redirect should get its own page, or that the page should be categorised instead of the redirect. I'd prefer a more elegant solution, but it's not harming anyone and is unlikely to cause confusion, so I'm fine with it staying. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-
Honestly, I think making a giant rant criticizing whoever is in charge of it is pointless, seeing as how I've done this several times. But I think I'll go again, because this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. The Purge was slated to take a few days, a week maybe, and then we'd be clear as crystal. If I recall correctly (I'm not very sure, it was almost a year ago), the Purge was actually delayed because of "the problem at the Wiki Forum", which, might I add, was completely fabricated. The problem, if there was one, was that nobody really wanted to take the fifteen seconds to change the forum from Locked to Unlocked. That's a different matter entirely, but it ties in here, because it seems projects at the HR Wiki take much, much, much, ''much'' longer than they need. Anybody else remember when the Purge was going to be over by October, guaranteed? And then we get no updates for quite a while until somebody pulls the excuse "oh, uh, mediawiki upgrade, yeah yeah" out. So the MediaWiki update took a little longer than it should have. That's understandable. But wasn't that released months ago? And the Purge is ''still'' going on? There are no excuses for this at all, aside from the incredibly vague "technical issues". And yeah, I know you people have lives off of the Internet, but we're not asking you to devote your life to the wiki. We're just asking you to ''finish what you started a year ago.'' But it seems that's a little much to ask. [[User:The Noid|The Noid]] 17:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
==Markiplier Mentions==
-
:i've talked to dot com who says it's going down, but i'd really love to speed this process up; i don't even care about the little intricacies of the fanstuff, the modifications. just give us a blank wiki, we don't care. [[Special:Contributions/68.94.38.32|68.94.38.32]] 01:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Actually, I kinda liked the little cartoon... {{User:Shadow Scythe of Strongbadia?!/sig}} 04:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
+
I recently noticed the Markiplier has referenced Homestarrunner.com on more than one occasion.
-
:Replying to specific points of rants is usually a waste of time, so I won't bother. In fact, I only skimmed the above, but I already know basically what it says. I am sorry that it has taken so long; it was never my intention for it to drag on like this. I feel especially bad for people like Shwoo who are legitimately creative and who don't want to use the fanstuff wiki purely for their own adolescent amusement. I haven't forgotten you. For those of who don't think the new wiki even exists, it does, and it has from day one. Now if I could just make it so that people could log in to the darn thing, we'd be all set. MediaWiki 1.14 has been released, and I am making good progress, but remember that everyone who works on this site is a volunteer, myself included, and I have a day job, a job where I've just come through the busiest months of the year. I do however pledge to you that the fanstuff wiki will not reopen never, so long as you all don't manage to complain away my will to live. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Maybe you could set the entire wiki to read-only while you fix the login powers. I know of at least one person who wants to see his email inbox again... [[Special:Contributions/24.20.249.36|24.20.249.36]]
+
-
I don't know if this topic is dead, but I'd like to point out something: I found this while googling around. Anybody know what this is? http://homestar.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page {{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 15:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Archive ==
+
He made a vague reference to the Virus SBEmail in his :The Game: trilogy.
-
What do you have to say about running an archive of our deleted pages? Some sound interesting and I want to see them. I won't become a sysop anytime soon, so... --{{User:Fangoriously/SIGGY HERE!}} 16:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
Also in his playthrough of Home Improvisation I noticed that one of the boxes in the game has Fhqwhgads printed on it.
-
:All of the pages that were previously deleted obviously don't need to be kept, hence wwhy they were deleted by the [[Special:Listusers/sysop|overlords]] and [[Special:Listusers/bureaucrat|gods]] of the wiki. It would be too much trouble to bring them all back anyway, and a troll might grab the code and restore the page. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 17:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
+
{{User:ToaJuaraevo01/sig1}} 22:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 +
:Markiplier is a good fit for [[Other Sightings]]. See the entries for [[Other Sightings#Brutalmoose|Brutalmoose]], [[Other Sightings#DaThings|DaThings]], or [[Other Sightings#PeanutButterGamer|PeanutButterGamer]] for examples of how to note the mentions. Describe Markiplier's references and link to the videos where they appear, timestamped if possible. The "Home Improvisation" reference can go in [[Game Sightings]]. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 05:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 +
::Thanks, Done! {{User:ToaJuaraevo01/sig1}} 17:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
-
== 50 best sbemails ==
+
== DVD commentary filmographies? ==
-
someone mark this post as patrolled; visit the store if you have to.  The [[Sbemail's 50 Greatest Hits|post]] might need a clean up, but it's true. {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 11:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
+
Although the DVD commentaries are generally just the two Brothers Chaps, many times they are joined by [[contributors|friends and family]] and/or Matt will portray one of the dumb animal characters. The toon articles all identify who is present for the DVD version with a "Commentary by:" subheader, but is there a separate article tracking commentators? Something like [[:Category:Filmography]], [[Strong Bad Email By Name of Sender]], or [[Fan Costumes#Costumes]]. If not this is something that I think would be a good addition to the wiki. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 17:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
-
*This is true. Someone patrol it; everyone needs to know this!
+
:Each DVD page (e.g. [[strongbad_email.exe Disc One]]) lists the commentators of each toon, but it might be interesting and helpful to have a centralized list of all of them. Ideally it should be formatted differently from the DVD articles (such as having separate sections for each character), or else it might be redundant. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
-
Can somebody who own the dvd please complete the article ASAP? [[User:Omnisweater|Omnisweater]] 17:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:The sooner you buy it, the sooner you can take care of that. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
+
-
== Image:Egg.jpg ==
+
== Loading issues ==
-
Is it a good idea to make this image transparent so it doesn't look awful on black surfaces? I looked at the thing's user page, and that white box on black is really annoying. I have made a PNG of this, but I don't think it looks that great either. {{User:Iyeru/sig}}
+
I've been having some loading issues on both Chrome and Firefox with ad blockers off. [[User:Wolf O&#39;Donnel|Wolf O&#39;Donnel]] 08:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
-
 
+
:The wiki tends to load slower when it receives more traffic. My guess is that more people are coming here to check if the Halloween toon/teaser is out. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
-
== Signature Size ==
+
-
 
+
-
is my signature size fine? Because the coffee cup only extends a few pixels outside the box -_-
+
-
 
+
-
http://hrwiki.org/index.php/User_talk:Iyeru/sig#testing {{User:Iyeru/sig}}
+
-
:It's no worse than [[User:Phlip/sig|Phlip's]], so I think it is fine. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 00:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
+

Revision as of 22:08, 13 November 2021

Main Page Talk
Archive

1 (1-20)
2 (21-40)
3 (41-60)
4 (61-80)
5 (81-100)
6 (101-120)
7 (121-140)
8 (141-160)
9 (161-180)
10 (181-200)
11 (201-220)
12 (221-240)
13 (241-260)
14 (261-280)
15 (281-300)
16 (301-320)
17 (321-340)
18 (341-360)
19 (361-380)
20 (381-400)
21 (401-420)
22 (421-440)
23 (441-460)
24 (461-480)

25 (481-500)
26 (501-520)
27 (521-540)
28 (541-560)
29 (561-580)
30 (581-600)
31 (601-620)
32 (621-640)
33 (641-660)
34 (661-680)
35 (681-700)
36 (701-720)
37 (721-740)
38 (741-760)
39 (761-780)
40 (781-800)
41 (801-820)
42 (821-840)
43 (841-860)
44 (861-880)
45 (881-900)
46 (901-920)
47 (921-940)
48 (941-960)


It has been suggested that the Main Page be redesigned. Feel free to use its project page for proposed redesigns.

Contents

Featured content of the day (or whenever) issue

I noticed that the trogdor 08 link to "watch" links to trogday.html, and not trogday08.html is this a known issue? ColdReactive 13:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Fixed. — It's dot com 15:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussions

There are a lot of talk page discussions happening on this wiki. The problem is, this wiki is not very active, so such discussions rarely get consensus and very few things get done. (That's why I'm always reviving old discussions with a phrase like "I still agree with this.") I think there should be some way to keep track of all the ongoing discussions. Maybe a [[HRWiki:Discussions]] page or something to keep these discussions from becoming inactive. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 01:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

I still agree with this. (See? That proves my point!) Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 06:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I also agree with this. (You have a good point!) Minecraft lover147 04:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
There's HRWiki:Open Discussions - not really active, but since it's directly linked from The Stick it could be revived easily. -- Bleu Ninja 21:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Aquabats Kickstarter Cameo

Homestar Runner makes an appearance in this Aquabats Kickstarter video

[1] — 108.54.219.151 (Talk | contribs) 20:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC) (left unsigned)

February 21?

Why does the Main Page say that the newest Skills of an Artist was released on February 21 when it was released this month? 76.184.27.104 20:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

My bad. I probably copy-pasted it when updating and forgot to change the date. Thanks for bringing it to my attention~ --DorianGray 20:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Two Questions

These two edits raise two questions concerning wiki standards.

See HRWiki talk:Standards → Linking to articles with disambiguation in the page title
and HRWiki talk:Standards → Retroactive names in transcripts

Some questions we would like to ask about...

Hi there, I'm a stranger who wants to ask you some questions.

1) When will ALL the old Flash pages turn to HTML5?

2) When are you going to UNBAN IP addresses who "committed" persistent vandalism?

3) If Flash is dead, are you going to cancel HomestarRunner.com ?

4) Why wouldn't we see ANY updates from 2011 to 2014?

5) Could y'all please tell us what email The Brothers Chaps have?

--83.185.35.154 18:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

1) We don't know. Ask the Brothers Chaps.
2) Never. Why should we?
3) You'll have to be more specific as to what that means exactly. We aren't involved with homestarrunner.com, so we can't take down someone else's website. And The Brothers Chaps are planning to give the site a HTML5 update, so they won't take it down.
4) Kids, creative burnout, side projects, etc. See HRWiki:Hiatuses for more details.
5) Their email address used to be brotherschaps@homestarrunner.com, but it was removed from the site's Email page, so it seems @StrongBadActual is now their primary contact method.
Hope this helps! Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 22:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Concerning the answer #2, why never? --83.185.35.154 22:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
To reduce the risk of a repeat offender. The Knights Who Say Ni 23:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
THAT repeat offender is way worse than CE5, aren't we right? --83.185.35.154 23:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Look, I'm not sure what your issues are, but the simple truth is that the best thing for you to do is behave like someone who has never even heard the name "Maudi Algabban" (we are not fooled, we know who you are) and has literally zero curiosity about the name or the user's history, while also showing no particular interest toward all the things you show far too much interest over (such as the Pyongyang reference, the hiatuses, and the possibility of homestarrunner.com being taken down) and never, ever, even for a moment, even consider writing loud yelling, swearing posts demanding people unblock you and give you answers to questions we have no way of answering. Also, make constructive Wiki edits (that means not vandalism, with or without scare quotes), not just Talk page chatter. Basically, you need to start over completely and pretend you are not and were never you and do not care about you - and that doesn't mean to insult yourself, it means do not mention yourself. You've built up far too much bad karma, so it's very likely that even the slightest hint that you are you will be treated with immediate suspicion, and likely result in further blocks. And if you think this is unreasonable, perhaps what you really need to do is to find a way to end your obsession with this Wiki. You've been pulling these bizarre stunts for literal years. --Jay (Gobble) 23:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I must tell you all that I'm NOTHING but a stranger, but if you would like to send some ANGRY emails to him, his email address is -redacted- . Maudi MUST be punished and he's WAY the worst contributor on Homestar Runner Wiki! LET'S GET HIM!!!! --83.185.35.154 23:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
*sigh* I tried. --Jay (Gobble) 23:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Netiquette w/r/t interviews on defunct sites

As I clean up various pages on the site I'm finding that many cited interviews and links are dead and gone.

See HRWiki talk:Standards → Interviews on defunct sites


https

Hi! Can you make this site secure please, https. Thanks kindly!

 ?
I have literally no idea what you mean by that. -Minecraft lover147 04:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

YouTube channel?

Maybe you could consider adding the HomestarRunner YouTube channel to the new content watchlist, since that's where TBC seems to be doing most of their work, now?

ToaJuaraevo01(Forgot how to sign)

To sign, just put four tildes after your post (~~~~). Lira (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
If you just want your name, like this:Minecraft lover147, you just put 3 tildes after your post (~~~). If you want to do your name and the time, do the aforementioned 4 tildes. To do just the time, like this: 05:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC), do 5 tildes (~~~~~).
This post has been posted by Minecraft lover147. The time it was posted is 05:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC).
I disagree. YouTube is really more of a dumping ground for all the old Flash stuff that is still available on the site, but might not be should the Flash plug be pulled. And though I prefer to avoid YouTube, I don't think the Homestar Runner YouTube channel has been updated in months. Because YouTube is a place where absolutely nothing happens. I would mention that most new content is now posted on Twitter, but much of it doesn't qualify as full toons that demand full attention. (This may change, but not in the foreseeable future). -- 68.37.43.131 13:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
There actually is SOME original content on there, if you bother to look. ToaJuaraevo01 File:Homsar-in-motion.gif 04:12, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
What exactly do you mean "new content watchlist"? YouTube-exclusive content is already listed and documented in numerous places. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 07:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Redesign

I was just looking at the HRWiki:Main page redesign, and it had something entitled, "On this day..." for H*R stuff that happened on that day in history. I like the idea of that, but when I looked on it, it had stuff for February 9th. Where I live, it's still February 8th. I know this wiki is centered around UTC, but it could be very confusing for someone who doesn't know that. -Minecraft lover147 04:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Sick Homestar, BRAH

Why is homestar sick looking on the main page button? Found no other place to post this question --Jeffjman[2] 16:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

World events, Jeff. World events. — It's dot com 17:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
How long exactly will the COVID-related logos continue to show up? It's been long enough now - if it was even necessary in the first place. Yes, we get it. Current events, the end times have almost come, we almost danced the Conga of the Apocalypse, etc. We get that. I think everyone who visits this wiki is aware of that by now. I think we'd all be aware of that even if this wiki's logo didn't shove it in our faces every few page loads (though I do appreciate that it is no longer EVERY page load like it was at first). And I don't think any of us like being reminded of it - especially not this long after the fact. I'm sure most of us visit this wiki to take our minds off of the bad news for a while, not to be reminded of it by the logo. But it's your call, I suppose. I do hope I'm not coming across as rude - I just want to give my two cents on the matter since no one has brought up this point of view yet. 76.184.23.181 01:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
What's funny is I agree with you—it has been long enough now, and I don't like being reminded of it, either. In fact I came this close to taking it down completely a couple of days ago, but I stopped myself. It just didn't feel right, since this mess is still very much not over. But I toned it way down (btw, the most it has ever appeared is on half of all page loads; now it's on a twelfth). If you'd like to eliminate it completely, you can of course create an account and then set whatever logo you like on your user CSS page. As you mention, no one else has brought up this point of view yet. If they do, I'll reconsider whether it's time to take it down altogether. — It's dot com 03:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
1) You have no idea how relieved I am to hear that you agree with me for the most part! :)
I apologize if I came across as preemptively defensive earlier. I'm not the best at wording, so I was gulp-afraid of saying the wrong thing and being misunderstood... that's happened to me a lot, especially in discussions about this pandemic. (Which is the major reason for me not liking to be reminded of it too often if possible.)
2) Oh yes, I do remember that even in the beginning it wasn't on every page load. I think I initially assumed it was on only certain pages or something. And I did notice that it wasn't appearing as frequently lately, but I wasn't sure if that meant it had been toned down or was just a coincidence (at one point I even thought it was finally gone). Once every 12 page loads is acceptable, especially now that I know I'm not the only one who's tired of it. ;)
3) I didn't know it was possible to change the logo on my user CSS page. I don't have a lot of practice with CSS but I might give it a try. Thanks for letting me know!
4) I suppose it should be mentioned: technically I do have an account here, that I made when I was about 14 or 15. Same with the forum. But I've haven't been to the forum in years and have barely used the wiki account - instead, I mostly just browse the wiki, and, on VERY rare occasions, post on talk pages. Every once in a while I think about logging in and making contributions more often and becoming a regular user (after all, I read talk pages more than the average non-contributing user does, and several times I've thought of edits I could make), but... I said a LOT of dumb things on the forum back in the day, and my wiki and forum usernames are similar, so I cringe thinking about the possibility that people might still remember all of that. One of these days I'm going to see if I can still log in so I can change my username.
76.184.23.181 07:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Turns out the coronavirus doubles as a computer virus. TheThin 20:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

What's new correction

The "What's New" should have the Fan Costumes from Thanksgiving at the bottom. Wolf O'Donnel 03:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I think whoever edited What's New last opted to take the Fan Costumes out instead, because the Halloween toon is a bigger, more significant update. The importance of updates should be considered alongside their recent,,,ness. A big toon should take priority over a short, and so on. --DorianGray 04:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
I did that. I was under the impression that the box was meant to primarily show the updates on the site's "what's new" button. The Halloween toon is there, while the Fan Costumes is not. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
A good rule of thumb is that we should list everything within the last month and anything that's still in the What's New button, and if we still have space to fill, we can include older things that you can actually watch, like toons. — It's dot com 14:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Site on the fritz

The wiki has been taking an age to load lately. Is there something amiss or do just that many people wanna know what the crap Bod is? Guybrush20X6 12:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Yeah that happens sometimes, especially when there's a new toon. — It's dot com 16:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

History preservation

Could you keep the pages for the stuff that will be removed from the website in 2021 (e.g. games, character videos, etc.) on the Wiki, so as to preserve the history of the website? (That "Mashed Potato Jones" comment from "Halloween Fairstival" and other stuff that was changed should be kept on the Wiki, too)

Has there been any announcement indicating that content will be removed from the website? I believe individuals have made content archives and projects such as Lightspark should allow such content to remain playable after flash's EOL. So we should be ok? Still I haven't seen any notice of content deletion as of yet. --Stux 18:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Remove FeedBurner from the main page

If we're not doing a main page redesign in the near future, could we at least replace the link to FeedBurner with @StrongBadActual? It's where updates really happen now. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 07:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Elcool. Which is why I decided to be bold and make the exact update he suggests. --Jay (Gobble) 10:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
A bold edit? on the Main Page?!?!? :O Awesome! Elcool (talk)(contribs) 12:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
NOTE: I've updated the redesign discussion here in response to this update. --Stux 19:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
To Elcool, Jay, and the rest of the sysops (and the greater wiki community at large): I would greatly appreciate everyone's feedback on if and how to move forward with the main page redesign! This is another thing that has stalled for years and I think even small changes would be helpful. However, changes for the main page need to begin with sysop and admin participation! Thanks! --Stux 13:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Flash archive preservation

What are we going to do with the wiki's flash archives? We need to preserve the old content, and there isn't any sign that the brothers chaps will post them on youtube.

[They've got their top man on it.] And we got all the files backed up here so if needed we can run our own legacy player for stuff like Where the Crap are we? or worst case scenario, beg Newgrounds for their player. Guybrush20X6 00:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
And just like that, they've unveiled a new HTML site that runs Ruffle for the old crap! I already found two Easter eggs! Guybrush20X6 01:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Some sbemails redirect to the wrong ones.

As an example: 1 step ahead redirects to sbemail 29 if you take the link to http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail28.html ColdReactive 08:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Sounds like a redirect bug to me (or similar). It could be noted in the Post-Flash Site Update page. But more importantly TBC should be made aware of this so it can be fixed. Not sure what the best way to do that is, I don't think they have a 'report site problems' link or similar. Oh, I guess there's also twitter! --Stux 08:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Index page seems to be missing from the Main Page

The title says it all: every since the Post-Flash Site Update, it seems the Index Page has risen to prominence a bit more than before. It should probably be included in the Main Page as well! --Stux 09:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I see this a lot. Why do people say that the title says it all and then go on to say more things? Anyway I added the index page to the main page. — It's dot com 16:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
That is a very good question! I had never thought of that before. I almost didn't put the phrase in, but I still felt like it should go there. People are riddled and mired in contradiction. That's the only thing that comes to mind. Also, thank you very much for adding the link! --Stux 13:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Breaking tradition

Twice, I've come across edits that go against tradition. I'm fairly certain we have never had a disambiguation with a non-name-matching entry or a categorised redirect, and I also don't understand the sudden acceptance for them. RickTommy (edits) 13:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Tradition for tradition's sake isn't necessarily a good thing. If all decisions were made purely based on precedent, nothing would ever change. Also, since these edits have been made, they are no longer unprecedented. When these precedents were established is irrelevant; what matters is whether these practices should continue based on their own merits.
The first is more common than you think (Haunted House, for instance, has no links with "Haunted House" in the title). The content of the page is just as relevant as its title, so I see no reason to enforce such a restriction. I can imagine a user looking for the sbemail about eggs, and visiting that disambiguation for help finding it.
I'm more conflicted on the second thing. I can see the benefits, but to me, a categorised redirect is an indication that either the redirect should get its own page, or that the page should be categorised instead of the redirect. I'd prefer a more elegant solution, but it's not harming anyone and is unlikely to cause confusion, so I'm fine with it staying. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 19:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Markiplier Mentions

I recently noticed the Markiplier has referenced Homestarrunner.com on more than one occasion.

He made a vague reference to the Virus SBEmail in his :The Game: trilogy.

Also in his playthrough of Home Improvisation I noticed that one of the boxes in the game has Fhqwhgads printed on it. ToaJuaraevo01 File:Homsar-in-motion.gif 22:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Markiplier is a good fit for Other Sightings. See the entries for Brutalmoose, DaThings, or PeanutButterGamer for examples of how to note the mentions. Describe Markiplier's references and link to the videos where they appear, timestamped if possible. The "Home Improvisation" reference can go in Game Sightings. -- Bleu Ninja 05:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Done! ToaJuaraevo01 File:Homsar-in-motion.gif 17:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

DVD commentary filmographies?

Although the DVD commentaries are generally just the two Brothers Chaps, many times they are joined by friends and family and/or Matt will portray one of the dumb animal characters. The toon articles all identify who is present for the DVD version with a "Commentary by:" subheader, but is there a separate article tracking commentators? Something like Category:Filmography, Strong Bad Email By Name of Sender, or Fan Costumes#Costumes. If not this is something that I think would be a good addition to the wiki. -- Bleu Ninja 17:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Each DVD page (e.g. strongbad_email.exe Disc One) lists the commentators of each toon, but it might be interesting and helpful to have a centralized list of all of them. Ideally it should be formatted differently from the DVD articles (such as having separate sections for each character), or else it might be redundant. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Loading issues

I've been having some loading issues on both Chrome and Firefox with ad blockers off. Wolf O'Donnel 08:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

The wiki tends to load slower when it receives more traffic. My guess is that more people are coming here to check if the Halloween toon/teaser is out. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 03:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal tools