HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 39 (Sep 22-28): hope so!)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2189 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]  
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 30]] (Jul 21-27) ===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
Since it has been talked quite a bit, why don't we feature [[techno]] for this week? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:I'm down. Oh, wait, I mean, the system is down. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 31]] (Jul 28-Aug 3) ===
+
===Redirects===
-
How about [[Lowercase i's]]? That's becoming a quite large inside joke. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 22:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:Sure, Lowercase i's would be good. That one has a decent amount of text anyway. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::I'll just throw in and support Lowercase i's for this week. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Seems like a pretty good choice to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
+
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 32]] (Aug 4-10) ===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
Since we haven't done one in a while, how about a TGS issue? I'm thinking [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 1|the first one]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I would advise against us featuring TGS 1 for this reason: It's a subset of the email [[comic]]. Therefore, it makes more sense to feature that email instead, as it helps show where TGS came from and gives us the first episode.
+
-
:As an alternative, perhaps TGS 11, since it has a summer theme? Alternatively, we could wait a few weeks and do TGS 4, with its back-to-school theme. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::I like the idea of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 11]] being featured for this week.  TGS as a whole has not been featured enough. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Okay, let's just do [[comic]], then, huh? I agree that TGS isn't shown more often, but let's try to save some of the post-tenth issue ones (i.e., Issue 11) for later. Besides, wouldn't it be overkill to have two summer-themed toons in a short timespan, since I proposed Summer Short Shorts at one point? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::In agreement. Let's do the email comic. It'll be just like featuring a TGS comic, but this shows where it came from. (I actually didn't know until now) [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 01:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::If we're going to do techno two weeks before, I don't think we should do another email this week. I don't see any reason we can't do two summer-themed cartoons, but if we don't want to, I still suggest delaying TGS a few weeks and doing Issue 4 (partly because we haven't featured many early TGS episodes). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I say we shouldn't do any more summer themed Featured Articles. If any school people are at all like me (and I know some are), they will be thinking "Aww man, we hafta go back to school again soon!" by August. I think [[comic]] would be a good idea. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::And I still say two emails separated by only one week is too many in such a short timespan. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::(KOs colons and throws them into an active volcano) Not really... We have nearly 200 SBEmails total. I doubt that many have been featured. There are more SBEmails than anything else. It's not a big deal. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 13:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Yeah. I'm surprised we haven't featured emails more often! So we should not complain about having emails close together. Besides, there was one time where was an entire week's worth of Tandy 400 emails, I seem to recall. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::That's still only one week, not two weeks of email with only one in between. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
Sorry to burst your bubble guys, but [[comic]] was featured for week 31, 2005. How about the [[locker room]]?  [[User:Hazzard4123|Hazzard4123]] 18:05 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:But that was actually just an article on the series as a whole. I'm talking about the actual email. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::So was I. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 00:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Exactly. With "comic", we could kill two birds with one stone: we'll do something with both the squad of teenagers of the female persuasion ''and'' an email on the part of that guy in the wrestling mask. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Since TGS is purposed for a few weeks back, how about an object?  [[Whatsit]] might be an amusing article to feature... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 16:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::One problem: The organization of [[Whatsit]] is a bit confuzzling and needs a lot of work to be featured. Seriously. So, [[comic]] has my vote. Again, seriously. {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 20:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I disagree on both counts. Please note that, with TGS 3 on the main page this week, [[comic]] is more or less out of the question. [[Whatsit]] is generally good already, and is a good example of how to avoid an "often appears" article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I disagree entirely. Whatsit (the article) does not describe whatsit (the thing), only state its apperances inn the Homestar Runner Universe. What about... [[mini golf]]! Or [[crazy cartoon]]! the first two toon I saw on H*R. {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 11:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Telling about its appearances in the H*R universe is exactly what an article here should do. That's the purpose of this wiki. We don't need a scientific explanation of its composition (leave that for Wikipedia). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
We really need some fresh opinions here, i.e., opinions from those who haven't already weighed in here, as no consensus is emerging thus far. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
+
==Article discussions==
-
:Hey, [[Whatsit|whatsit]] is okay with me. The only other thing that I can think of is the [[Double Deuce]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 33]] (Aug 11-17) ===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
How about &mdash; Psssshhh! &mdash; the [[Double Deuce]]! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:I'm thinking [[Fonts]] or [[Fonts By Toon]].  Haha.  Just kidding.  Sadly, those pages'll never make it as a featured article, I'm afraid.  Oh, [[Fonts]]!  I pine for you.  <sniff>  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 08:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::Re: the [[Double Deuce]] We look to already be doing a running gag two weeks before, so I'm thinking not such a good idea (but keep it mind for the future). Opti: Hmm, I wish there were a way to feature one of those, and if I ever think of a way, I certainly will suggest it. It's a really great amount of obscure info, but how to make it featurable I don't know. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, except the two weeks prior, the running gag is of a different variety than the Double Deuce, so no offense, but they should not be exactly comparable. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Sure, they're different types, but I still argue they're too similar in type to occur so close together. Not to mention that I think it's a bad idea how we have running gags divided into several categories, anyway. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::If we can't have a running gag, how about [[Drive-Thru Whale]]?  He's starting to become a fairly prominent pseudocharacter....{{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::I think that would be sweet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Go Drive Thru Whale! {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 18:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 34]] (Aug 18-24) ===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
For this week, my option is the [[Heavy Lourde|Heavy Load. I mean, Lourde]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:Sure. That's a good one. {{User:Peter222/sig}}
+
-
::It's a bit on the short side, but I guess it's workable. And it is an interesting object (debuted with Homsar, after all, way back in the early days of sbemail). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::I dunno about this one. Most information in the article right now is either speculations or talking about other weights that look like the weight but are not the same one. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 23:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Maybe it is too much of that. I've removed what I think was the least relevant info. What's left is a bit on the short side. You reckon we could expand it? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Still, the Monty Python and bilingual labeling part of the article is still speculation. I don't think there is enough actual facts in the article to make it a FA. How about instead we do something completely different and feature the quite popular toon [[Where's The Cheat?]]. It's quite long, and it has every main character in it! {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Re:Heavy Lourde: Since no one's stepped in to fix it, I'm going to say maybe not do that one. I do kind of think it'd be nice to do an object, since we haven't featured one in a bit and we feature a lot of toons (in the generic sense; not only including big toons). Any ideas? If not, let's go ahead and do Where's The Cheat (while keeping in mind an object for a future feature). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Hey, I got an idea: if we can't do Heavy Lourde, then let's do another object, like the [[BMW Lighter]]. That's an object, too. I simply looked at the [[:Category:Object running gags|list of object running gags]] and I had the idea. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:30, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::[[HRWiki:Featured_article_for_2005%2C_week_48|Already been featured]], I'm afraid. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Hmm... okay, how about [[Interactive Menus]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::I dunno, that one seems a bit lacking in content. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::Can we do [[The Municipality]] for this week? {{User:Peter222/sig}}
+
-
::::::::::::Maybe; seems to have enough content. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::But if we do The Municipality, we should also include somewhere down the line the [[On Point Kings]] and/or [[The Homestarmy]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::::The Homestarmy was already featured, but sure, we could do the On Point Kings sometime. {{User:Peter222/sig}}17:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::::Let's plan on the Municipality for this week; then we can do the On Point Kings another time. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 35]] (Aug 25-31) ===
+
==General discussion==
-
Perhaps a game? It's been a while since we last featured one: week 8 of this year was the last time. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:How about one of the games that Strong Bad dreamed up in the [[video games]] email? Any of those would work. Or we could also do [[Stinkoman 20X6]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::We've been delaying featuring 20X6 until level 10 comes out... though even I begin to wonder if that's worth doing anymore. On the one hand, I don't like featuring an incomplete game because the situation is a bit awkward if it ever is finished (do we ever get to showcase the complete game?) Then again, I think it's highly possible the game will never be finished, since TBC seem to have moved on to other things (such as SBCG4AP). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Then let's do the [[StrongBadZone]] game. It's one of the games that SB has dreamed up in the "video games" email. And it has a decent amount of text to boot. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::I like that idea. It also begat one of the better-known H*R phrases, "YOUR HEAD A SPLODE". {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I'd like to suggest [[Commandos in the Classroom]], as this week is close to the start of school for a lot of people, and would have tons of "OMG! BACK TO SCHOOL FRENZY!" moments. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Hmm... if we do that, which at this point I'm neutral on, let's see if we can do StrongBadZone not long later, shall we? I can see the value of a back to school article, but we should make sure our heads engsmsplode ''sometime''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::What about Week 37? It's after the next week. ''{points down}'' {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 03:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Oh, "Commandos In the Classroom" is a good one, too. We hardly have ever featured anything regarding the commandos of the cheating variety. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 36]] (Sep 1-7) ===
 
-
This week would be Labor Day, and since we featured Labor Dabor last year, how about doing the "[[labor day]]" email this year? I think it fits, if only weakly. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:That's fine, but I don't think we should be talking about the September featured article in July. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 14:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::Why not? I don't think it's so much what date it's on that counts as how far ahead in terms of numbering thus far it is. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 14:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::I think ten weeks out is OK. More than that is going a bit too far, but ten is OK. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 37]] (Sep 8-14) ===
 
-
From the discussion for week 35:
 
-
<blockquote>
 
-
Perhaps a game? It's been a while since we last featured one: week 8 of this year was the last time. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:How about one of the games that Strong Bad dreamed up in the [[video games]] email? Any of those would work. Or we could also do [[Stinkoman 20X6]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::We've been delaying featuring 20X6 until level 10 comes out... though even I begin to wonder if that's worth doing anymore. On the one hand, I don't like featuring an incomplete game because the situation is a bit awkward if it ever is finished (do we ever get to showcase the complete game?) Then again, I think it's highly possible the game will never be finished, since TBC seem to have moved on to other things (such as SBCG4AP). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::Then let's do the [[StrongBadZone]] game. It's one of the games that SB has dreamed up in the "video games" email. And it has a decent amount of text to boot. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::I like that idea. It also begat one of the better-known H*R phrases, "YOUR HEAD A SPLODE". {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 
-
</blockquote>
 
-
 
-
Then someone else thought up a more seasonal idea for that week. Therefore, I move that we feature StrongBadZone this week instead. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:I'll second the featuring of [[StrongBadZone]] for this week. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 38]] (Sep 15-21)===
 
-
One of the [[Thy Dungeonman]] games. Period. [[User:Empaire|Empaire]] 13:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:I don't think we should do one of Thy Dungeonman games because it looks like we're doing StrongBadZone the week before this one, which is also a game. I suggest we do the toon taken off the site, [[A Jumping Jack Contest]]. {{User:Peter222/sig}}
 
-
::We're getting too far out once again; let's slow down a bit, huh? And [[A Jumping Jack Contest]] would be a good one. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::Sure, a little history for the main page never hurt anyone. Not even The Cheat. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 39]] (Sep 22-28) ===
 
-
I say maybe something related to [[Dangeresque]]. Like, the email [[stunt double]], or maybe [[dangeresque 3]]. {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 14:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:We're getting to far ahead of ourselves. We're only in July. I think it would be better to just make sure we know what featured articles we will be featuring for the next few weeks right now. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 19:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::Well, technically, we have done the [[Dangeresque (film series)|Dangeresque film series]] already. Might I suggest something entirely different? Like say, [[Homestar Runner and Marzipan's Relationship]]? That one has been suggested a long time ago, but no one was willing to do it because it was too close to another relationship article on the one between [[Homestar Runner and Strong Bad's Relationship|Homestar and Strong Bad]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::I guess we can do that one now. It's too bad there aren't more feature-worthy relationship articles, though. This might be our last one, we'll see. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::Not necessarily. We also have relationship articles between [[Strong Bad and Strong Sad's Relationship|Strongs Bad and Sad]] and [[Strong Bad and The Cheat's Relationship|Strong Bad and The Cheat]] in the nominations section. Mind you, they'd need to be updated somewhat, but I think they're doable. But yes, we should pace ourselves here. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::::I hope you're right. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools