HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2802 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
{| style="background:#CFC; border: 1px dashed #090"
+
 
-
|-
+
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
-
| style="padding:10px" | '''Checklist for new Featured Article:'''
+
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].
 +
 
 +
==Checklist==
 +
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
-
==Discussion Archives==
+
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]</center>
+
-
==Weeklies==
+
==Discussion archives==
 +
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 31]] (Jul 30-Aug 5) ===
 
-
I say Food and Drinks get a spotlight this week. How about [[Mountain Dew]], [[Potate]], [[SBLOUNSKCHED! Bar]]  or [[Fluffy Puff Marshmallows]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Those sound good, but I wanna see something real-world featured for once. Maybe [[TMBG Concert - 25 Sep 2004]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 19:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::If we're going to feature something real-world, we should cover [[Georgia Tech - 26 Apr 2007]] instead. It's the most recent and up-to-date of their public appearances and has relatively few page views. Also, you can't enjoy the TMBG Concert through the medium of text. The transcript doesn't do it great justice. Instead, you need to <font color="green">''purchase''</font> it to appreciate it. Not everyone has credit cards, you know! Therefore, it will be better to feature something informative that all can enjoy reading than something musical which only a minority can enjoy listening to. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::I support GT, it's a great article. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 32]] (Aug 6-12) ===
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
Following Trogga's suggestion, I say we feature '''[[Strong Badman]]'''. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
:Sure. Has good length, easy to summarize, and some other third thing. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 23:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
::I'm down. Good writing, good length. Yeah, sure. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 17:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
:::Not a huge fan of doing this two weeks after another SB-related character (Senor Cardgage). Yes, I realize SC is really a separate character, but still, a little overly SB-focused in my mind. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
::::Maybe [[Nintendo]] instead? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 19:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
:::::Nintendo sounds like a great idea. Good lead, good length, many images, and an important part of the body of work. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 33]] (Aug 13-19) ===
+
===Redirects===
-
''I've created a standby redirect to last week's featured article because no one, including myself, can seem to get an FA write-up started until the main page has a gaping red link in its featured article section. It's embarassing when an anonymous user has to start the featured article for us an hour after it should have debuted, and it makes me wonder why more of our regulars don't notice this sort of thing. Go ahead and put a write-up in place of the redirect once the article has been chosen.'' &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 01:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
 +
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
[[Senor Cardgage]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
:Perhaps move [[alternate universe]] here if Senor is gona be week 30? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
How's [[Big Knife]] sound? --[[User:Askingforachallenge|Askingforachallenge]] 02:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
+
==Article discussions==
-
:Too [[HRW:OA]]. I'd go for alternate universe. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 23:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::alternate universe. Also, Joe is right, we need to pay attention to this thing more often. I'm gonna watch this page and put a link at the top, myself. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 34]] (Aug 20-26) ===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
[[Action Cool 5]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Maybe, but it seems to me that most to all of the important content would fit on one FA section. [[Craig Zobel]]? {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 17:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Too short and unsourced. [[Homestar Runner and Marzipan's Relationship]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::I'm kind of uncomfortable featuring a relationship. I'd think I'd rather go with '''[[Nebulon]]'''. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 12:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Ugh. I dislike the writing. What about... oh! [[Mellow Mushroom]]! It may seem short, but we can lengthen it. You know, like make the characters section more text-like. "The characters include Mel O. Mushroom, the main character of Mellow Mushroom, Dude Shroomington, Mel O. Mushroom's friend; he seems to have a crush on Melody..." I think it would be good to feature something both interesting and not very well known in the Homestar Runner alternate universe. Although, it seems a little dated, so we may need to fix it up a little. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::MM sounds fine, but what's wrong with relationship pages? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 01:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I realize this is supposed to go live in a half hour, but... I don't agree with MM. I don't think completely non-H*R content is appropriate to be featured on HRWiki. I also agree with Trogga that there's no reason we couldn't feature a relationship. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Meh, I don't even think MM should ''be'' an article...{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::I don't think this FA is half bad. Candid readers and glancing HR fans should find little-known TBC work interesting enough. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 35]] (Aug 27-Sep 2) ===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
[[The Battle of Strong Badia]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:That sounds OK, but I'd rather see [[Weclome Back]] featured this week. You know, with Summer ending and everything. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Um, is it just me, or did Mellow Mushroom get featured without any mention of it here whatsoever? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 07:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::It's all up ons in the previous week's section.
+
-
::::I likes Weclome Back a lot, and I think it would go pretty well for this week. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 36]] (Sep 3-9) ===
+
==General discussion==
-
[[Georgia Tech - 26 Apr 2007]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:You know, we haven't had a public appearance as a FA so far this year. Seeing as this is a fairly recent article and has been accessed relatively few times, I like the idea of giving it some much-needed publicity. I mean, I didn't know this article existed 5 minutes ago! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::I CONCUR. It seems to be a pretty good idea. The only thing I can think of is whether or not we can fit enough info onto the FA section thing. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 17:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::I've already suggested a public appearance for an earlier week. How bout [[Corpy NT6]] instead? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 22:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::No, it's too short. If you were to feature it, you would have a daily feature thing with other computers. How about [[Sweet Cuppin' Cakes]] or [[Painting of a Guy with a Big Knife]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 12:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Would it be possible to lengthen [[School]] enough to make it a featured article? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I dunno... it seems like one sentence and some appearances... not possible, in this reporter's opinion. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 37]] (Sep 10-16) ===
 
-
[[Homestar Runner's Sleepwear]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 38]] (Sep 17-23) ===
 
-
[[The Show]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 39]] (Sep 24-30) ===
 
-
[[Couch Mumbling]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 15:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==General Discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
Line 88: Line 128:
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this)
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this)
 +
 +
[[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]]

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example:

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)