HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 14 (Apr 2-8): im ok wit pan-pan so u juys can do him ok???????)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 3007 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<div id="shortcut" style="border: 1px dashed blue; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; float: right; clear: both;">
+
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
-
Shortcuts:<br />[[HRWiki:FAS]], [[FAS]]</div>
+
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
-
{| style="background:#CFC; border: 1px dashed #090"
+
</div>
-
|-
+
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
| style="padding:10px" | '''Checklist for new Featured Article:'''
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].
 +
 
 +
==Checklist==
 +
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
-
==Discussion Archives==
+
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]]</center>
+
-
==Weeklies==
+
==Discussion archives==
 +
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 11]] (Mar 12-18) ===
 
-
If we're continuing the Stinkoman patten all year, then I say [[The Homestar Runner]] should be next. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 15:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:If we're continuing the Stinkoman pattern all year, then wouldn't [[Pan Pan]] be next? and [[The Homestar Runner]] be set for January of 2008? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 07:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
::Well, there aren't many notable 20X6 characters, so I say we do any main character variation each month this year. But I'm fine with either The Homestar Runner or Pan Pan for March. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 21:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
:::If we do Pan Pan this week, it will be only two weeks after 1-Up. Seems a bit soon to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
::::Ah, I misunderstood what you meant. Come to think of it, I wouldn't mind doing a year of Strong Bad alter-egos. Those pages all have a decent ammount of content and are distinctively different. We could cycle through on a monthly basis such articles as [[Strong Badman]], [[Sterrence]] and [[Old-Timey Strong Bad]]. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
+
</center>
-
:::::As I've suggested above, I'm not in favor of this idea. I think focusing on SB variations alone puts too much focus on one character. Re:This week: I think we should look in the direction of something not character related, since we will be featuring a character in week 9. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::We haven't featured a running gag in a while... maybe [[Aliases Used in Prank Calls]]? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Sounds like a good idea to me &mdash; especially since the last release was an Answering Machine. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Yes.  I agree also.  It looks like we're running out of time.  Anybody else?  --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 22:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::There's really no time left for speculation. We should use that! &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 18:43, 11 March 2007
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 12]] (Mar 19-25) ===
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
I suggest we use [[Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon]]. This is the week it came out and it was a very funny cartoon in my oppinion. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 01:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
:<s>That's an OK idea, but I wanna see an [[Marzipan's Answering Machine|Answering Machine]] featured for once. Maybe [[Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 9.2|Version 9.2]]?</s> --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 17:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
::Seeing that [[Aliases Used in Prank Calls]] was just chosen as this week's (or last week's) FA, let's feature something non-MAM related next instead. Maybe [[Sweet Cuppin' Cakes]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
:::I support '''Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon'''. I also think that all the Big Toons should be featured at some point. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
::::[[Pan Pan]] is also a good idea, if we're still doing a character every month. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 00:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
:::::Still a bit too recently after 1-Up, to my mind. I'm all for '''Stark Schlecht ist im Gefängnis'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
-
::::::It's almost time to post the next article. Any last-minute votes? &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 13:39, 18 March 2007
+
|}
-
:::::::Sure, SBIIJC will work. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 20:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Ahh, crap! I just noticed that the DVD commentary isn't even started. I guess that forces me to do that tonight. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 13]] (Mar 26-Apr 1) ===
+
===Redirects===
-
[[The King of Town's Castle]] or [[House of the Brothers Strong]], anyone? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 15:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:I like House of the Brothers Strong. It's more organized, is seen more often on the site and is probably more important in the H*R universe. Not that I don't like the Castle, I just think that the House should be featured first. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::Yeah, of the two, the Brothers' House article is closer to being ready to be featured.  More info and more central to the Homestar Runner universe. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 16:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Out of the main places (see the [[Places]] page), [[The Stick]] is the only one not featured, and for a good reason: If have hardly any info in it! I'm starting a talk there for people to add more info. If it's ready in two weeks time, then let's feature it. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::I'm not seeing that The Stick has been made ready for featuring. I'm thinking House of the Brothers Strong would work well. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 14]] (Apr 2-8) ===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
I don't think we've featured a sbemail yet this year. Maybe [[rock opera]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 15:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:Depending on the regularity of Strong Bad Emails, it is slightly possible that it might be almost time for email #173 by this time. It might not be until May or June though, or even later. In any case, I would like to see [[montage]] appropriately setup for the featured Strong Bad email of the spring, and used the week after the release of email #171 or so, just so that we're not left behind schedule if TBC decide to begin #173 an email early, and continue into another email story arc. That way we'll bring to light the long ago prophecy of [[The Paper]]'s retirement to those who may have been unaware or forgotten it. I bring this up so we don't have [[rock opera]] and [[montage]] featured right near each other. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 07:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
+
==Article discussions==
-
::Well, why don't we wait this one out a bit and see where we are by mid-March or so; i.e., what number of sbemails we're at by then. Then we can make a better-informed decision. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::After last week's MAM and the KOT VOQPCS the week before, I think we're safe to wait this one out a bit more. If we get sbemails from here on out, we'll be at 171 by this point. Maybe this week we could feature [[Pan Pan]], as some have suggested? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Still too soon for a 20X6 character. How about a <s>1936</s> [[Old-Timey]]? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 22:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Why do that when we haven't finished 20X6? (If indeed we want to feature Pan Pan at all, which we may not.) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 16:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Like I said before, there aren't many notable 20X6 characters. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Is this debate still active? We're coming all up on the end of the week, but it doesn't seem like anything's been decided yet.
+
-
:::::::Anyway, I would agree that we should feature a 20X6 character, but it seems to soon considering there was a 7-week gap between Stinkoman and 1-Up, while if we featured another 20X6 character now, there would only be a 5-week gap. I vote for an Old-Timey character, specifically [[The Sneak]]. &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 16:28, 31 March 2007
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
::::::::I'm neutral. People need to sing to the same chord quick, or we're keeping last week's featured article on the main page for the time being. Or at least until someone chooses an article by themself. Or at least until ''I'' choose an article by myself. Please don't make me do that. Pan Pan or The Sneak? Tell what U think. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 23:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
I'll go with the Sneak. Sam already fixed up the article a little bit, so it's a perfect candidate. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:I like that idea (The Sneak) &mdash; although I don't follow FAS enough to know how important the continuity of the 20X6 character featuring is. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::I don't like making the length of the article a big factor, but seriously, The Sneak is only a paragraph long. The entirety of the article would probably be on the Main Page. That doesn't seem good to me. Pan Pan isn't that great either, but at least it would require the reader to click on the link to read the whole thing. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}}
+
-
:::True, but I think only half of that would go on the main page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::Half of what? The Sneak? If only half of that goes on the Main Page, it would be too short. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}}
+
-
::::I've gone ahead and set up [[The Sneak]], even though I disagree with featuring it (Like Has Matt?, I think it is too short for a featured article). If anyone could expand the article, it would really help. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Well, if you believe Pan Pan would be better, I'm okay with that. TO be honest, We really do need to decide, and it's better to have it on one side than a tie. So, I'm okay with Pan Pan. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 15]] (Apr 9-15) ===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
Hey, how about [[Don and Harriet Chapman]]?  He did die this time last year.  Lest we forget... {{User:Theyellowdart/sig}}
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:I don't think that's a good idea. The death of the TBC's father is essentially a family issue, and I don't think it's our position to make a memorial on the anniversary of this event. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Do you have any better ideas?  What's wrong with remembering him?  MAy his legacy last forever... like Steve Irwin!  {{User:Theyellowdart/sig}}
+
-
:::Nothing's wrong with remembering him. But it's a little intrusive to put up a memorial-esque FA of him, as Heimstern said. Especially since they never even announced this officially. It's going to be a tough week for the family, and we shouldn't be showcasing it this week no matter how nice we make it look. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 01:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::I agree, that's not the best idea. And I DO have a better idea! What about ''{fanfare}'' [[Cool Tapes]]!...? {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Cool Tapes sounds better.  Sure.  But wouldn't that be better for August? {{User:Theyellowdart/sig}}
+
-
::::::Just making sure: We're talking about the band, right? Not the toon, which is called [[Cool Things]] (and has already been featured)? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Yeah, the band. And also, Theyellowdart, we don't HAVE to feature things around the time they were released. (I assume by August, you meant Cool Tapes first appearance ;-)) {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 05:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Cool Tapes seems... a little on the short side. Maybe [[DaVinci's Notebook]] (which has just been greatly expanded) instead? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 20:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::That is something that most people don't know about. And that article has a good amount of content. I say we do it. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 23:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Yeah... I guess... It does have much more content that Cool Tapes. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 15:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::Hm, I dunno: it's just that Da Vinci's notebook has only contributed to one toon.  But in the vein of contributors, what about someone like [[Craig Zobel]]? He even helped direct some of the toons, which a lot of people might not know. As a side note, I think that [[Contributors]] could make a great featured article someday, but right now it's too much of a list. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::Coach Z seems a little on the short side. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 19:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 16]] (Apr 16-22) ===
+
==General discussion==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 17]] (Apr 23-29) ===
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 18]] (Apr 30-May 6) ===
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 19]] (May 7-13) ===
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 20]] (May 14-20) ===
+
-
'''[[montage]].''' This one will require a bit of timing, and thus could be moved up or back depending on TBC's schedule, but we should feature this email when the release of email #173 is imminent. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:Ooooh... montage on #email 173... I like it, but I believe the featured article changes on Sundays, and email #173 should be out most likely on either a Monday or Tuesday... So, I'd like to see it happen, but it may be too hard to do. If so, a rough estimate should suffice. I'm taking a wild random guess that estimate is somewhere around here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 21]] (May 21-27) ===
 
-
'''[[The Paper]].''' This one goes hand-in-hand with the above. (Yes, I know we already featured The Paper on week 47 of 2005.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:No Paper, as it was already featured. And I can also see a whole lot shinoligans going on the page with reverts after tons of new info is added. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General Discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
-
In order to make daily featured articles, create pages like:
+
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki>
 
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
Line 111: Line 127:
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 0]]</nowiki>
+
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this)
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 1]]</nowiki>
+
 
 +
[[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]]

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools