HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 32 (Aug 3-9): why it's a bad idea)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 1540 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
-
 
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 25]] (Jun 15-21)===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
This week, we should do something for which I feel is long overdue for inclusion as a featured article: [[Blatant Lies]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:Decent sized intro, quite a bit of content besides, major theme of the site.  Good prize! '''ding!''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 16:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 26]] (Jun 22-28)===
+
===Redirects===
-
Since I've agreed we should do Senorial Day for week 22, we should try again to feature this week what was originally intended for that week: [[Lack of Visible Body Parts]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:07, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:I'm all for that! {{User:Jagger88/sig}}
+
<pre>
-
::''{discussion about the way the article itself should read moved to [[Talk:Lack of Visible Body Parts]].}'' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::So, how were we planning to feature this? Was there some sort of plan to have a writeup, even though the introduction is very short? Remember that we really shouldn't be including much of the text about lack of visible arms, since we already have featured an article about that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::[http://hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=641752 I tried writing a writeup.] {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 20:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
:::::OK, looks pretty workable, and manages to avoid duplicating armless articles. Looks like a go. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 27]] (Jun 29-Jul 5)===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
I think it's time for another [[Old-Timey]] character. I'm thinking of either [[Fat Dudley]], [[Old-Timey Bubs]] or [[Old-Timey Marzipan]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:This is the middle of the year, and because the page doesn't specify a release date, I think this week would be great for acknowledging the 10th anniversary of [[Marshmallow's Last Stand]].  As we don't know the date of release, the middle of the year gives us the best all round coverage of this significant subject.  {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 02:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Unfortunately, however, Marshmallow's Last Stand was already given an article [[HRWiki:Featured_articles/Archive_1#Week_33.2C_2005|a ''long'' time ago]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 14:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, about 4 years ago... isn't that when the old wiki was around?  I think that 4 yrs is long enough between repeats, and this is a VERY significant toon (like, the first full toon or something?).  If not this, then we should do something RELATING to this.  {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 09:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Nah, FAs started under the new wiki. As for repeating an FA, we've never done so in the past, and I'm disinclined to do so now, at least until we get to the point we really have very few new featurable articles. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Shouldn't we expand the intro to [[fireworks]] and feature that for Independence Day? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I don't live in the USA, and that thought never crossed my mind.  Yeah, lets do it, or [[Happy Fireworks]].  Either one.  {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 14:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Happy Fireworks has already been featured. As for [[fireworks]], find a way to expand the intro and we could definitely do that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Is it long enough now or should it be expanded a little more? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 16:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Okay, I think so now. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::I concur. Good prize. Ding. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 28]] (Jul 6-12)===
+
==Article discussions==
-
I'd like to see one of my favourite toons that we still haven't featured get the spotlight this week: [[A Folky Tale]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 09:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:That'd be interesting, except we're running out of Big Toons to discuss. Maybe we should go easy in the future, huh? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::I think that's pretty much inevitable. We don't get big toons very often, so starting to exhaust them is pretty much guaranteed. Heck, we're doing better than we were a few months ago now, what with [[Kick-A-Ball]] having been released. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, maybe after they release a few more, whenever that happens? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Ever since 2006, it feels like they either release 0 or 2 Big Toons every year. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 15:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Which they have done ever since they started the website. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::The years 2000 and 2005 had 3 Big Toons. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 21:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Well, now that SBemails are gone (maybe) and they've already made 2 toons this year, I'd say more big toons are on the way. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 22:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::I don't have a problem featuring Folky Tale. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.175|132.183.140.175]] 16:14, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Nor do I. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 17:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Then I guess I don't either. But let's go easy on them in the future, okay? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
Besides A Folky Tale, 9 Big Toons haven't got featured yet: [[Kick-a-Ball]], [[Career Day]], [[DNA Evidence]], [[Strongest Man in the World]], [[Shopping for Danger]], [[Parsnips A-Plenty]], [[Where's The Cheat?]], [[The Reddest Radish]], and [[In Search of the Yello Dello]]. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Make that ten with [[2 Part Episode: Part 1]], and if they don't merge part 2. And no, I am not going to keep updating this.[[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 11:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 29]] (Jul 13-19)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
For this week, we need to do [[50 emails]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:At the time this week comes around, it will have been about 3 months since we've featured an email ([[email thunder]]). It's a good idea, but many other articles that were good that got turned down by ones that were better (even ones that were suggested by you MHarrington) should be thought about for this week (SB's website, Crack Stuntman, etc.) [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Then how about [[Crack Stuntman]]? Of course, "50 emails" was once suggested but rejected, too. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 23:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::You're right, I forgot. Either one be's fine. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 00:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::So let's just do Crack Stuntman now and we'll do "50 emails" next week and Strong Bad's Website the week after. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Looks like we're swapping this and Week 24 now, so [[Crimes Committed by Strong Bad]] is this week's featured article, and Stuntman will be featured 5 weeks ahead of "plan". {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 11:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 30]] (Jul 20-26)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
I think we should try again to do [[50 emails]] this week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:Well, no one's said anything for a while, so I'll go ahead and second it. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::More like, YOU feature [[50 emails]], ''NERD!'' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 31]] (Jul 27-Aug 2)===
+
==General discussion==
-
As stated from the previous week, we now should feature [[Strong Bad's Website]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Actually, you stated it the week BEFORE the previous week. [[Seriously]], though, it's a good idea. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 32]] (Aug 3-9)===
 
-
For this week, I was thinking of the [[Double Deuce]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 04:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:How about [[Doughnuts]]? It's had quite a bit of references, but the intro needs quite a bit of expansion. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::The intro is far too short, nor do I think that it could be expanded beyond what it has.  We're looking for toons, characters or major themes of the site.  While Doughnuts show up in a lot of unusual ways, I don't think it makes a good FA. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools