HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Two Thingys)
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2469 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]]</center>
+
==Featured Article Queue==
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
==Article discussions==
+
===Redirects===
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 7]] (Feb 11-17)===
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
[[Who Said What]]. [[User:60.230.37.94|60.230.37.94]] 06:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
:We really shouldn't be featuring that. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
::At some point, we ought to feature something from the Lappynapping saga. Ideally, I'd love to feature the entire saga for a week, but we don't exactly have a summary article for the whole thing, and I'm not sure we should. One possibility could be just featuring [[cliffhangers]] one week and [[retirement]] the next (pros, it allows us to cover the saga; cons, it takes up two weeks). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
:::I like the idea, but I also agree with the problems. The closest we have to a summary article is on [[Lappy 486#Lappy-napping|the Lappy's page]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
::::How bout a Valentines/Valentimes day toon. [[Teen Girl Squad 12|TGS 12]]. [[User:Justin Master of Nature|Justin Master of Nature]] 21:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
:::::Since Valentimes is so rarely done in H*R, featuring [[Teen Girl Squad 12]] would be a good thing for this week.  Hopefully, TBC will add more "holiday specials" in the future. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 23:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
::::::Totally! Great Idea, I think TGS is important to Vanentines day with Cheerleader's boy obsession. Dynamite =)
+
</pre>
-
:::::::Sure, we can wait on the Lappynapping saga. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Which is a good idea anyway, until we figure out how to feature something that doesn't have a direct page (yet?). Also support TGS12. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 05:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::How about [[Date Nite]]? That'd make sense for Valentine's, don't you think? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 08:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::It would, but I reckon TGS 12 will work well, too, and since there's already broad support for it, I think we'll do that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::One word. TGS 12. Ok, 2. [[User:Sbemailnum314159|Sbemailnum314159]]
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 8]] (Feb 18-24)===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
How bout [[Where's An Egg?]]. [[User:Aaron Master of Life|Aaron Master of Life]] 20:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:I dunno, I was thinking [[retirement]]. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::Umm...No. Well, maybe ...{drum roll} [[Listerine]]. {{User:Justin Master of Nature/sig}} 21:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::[[retirement]] might be good, but [[Listerine]] is way to short and let's not forget that it is a [[HRW:OA]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::I think that [[nightlife]] may be good. It features a lot of important remarks and such in it. Besides, Listerine is too short, anyways. Dynamite 0.o
+
-
:::Nightlife is probably too new for an FA. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::By the time this article is featured, it wont be. DYNAMITE :{
+
-
::::[[Double Deuce]]?!?!?!!?!!?!?!!?!?!?![[User:Justin Master of Nature|Justin Master of Nature]] 16:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Well, My choices are as follows and I quote:
+
-
:::::"[[Where's an Egg]],<br>
+
-
:::::[[Double Deuce]],<br>
+
-
:::::[[The Simpsons]]"<br>
+
-
:::::{{User:Justin Master of Nature/sig}} 16:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I'm all for Where's an Egg, personally. Great game, thorough article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Yeah, finally a sysop accepting my choices! I suggested it in the first place!:D[[User:Justin Master of Nature|Justin Master of Nature]] 21:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Really, Justin? It looks to me like Aaron Master of Life suggested it first, not you. How is it that you were the one to suggest it in the first place? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::How about [[Strong Bad Smiling]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 08:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
<nowiki>:</nowiki>| no. Where's an Egg? --[[User:Justin Master of Nature|Justin Master of Nature]] 21:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I like Where's An Egg? too. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
Heimstern, '''I'''  put it on the nominations page  '''before Aaron''' put it here. (My real name is Aaron, AMOL's real name is Spencer) [[User:Justin Master of Nature|&#91;&#91;Usser talk:Justin Master of Nature&#124;Justin]] &#91;&#91;User:Justin Master of Nature&#124;Master of Nature]]]] 19:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:It all seems rather petty, doesn't it? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 9]] (Feb 25-Mar 2)===
+
==Article discussions==
-
[[Who Said What]]. That game is very popular now, and should be featured, especially since it is so far the only old game not featured.
+
-
:In case this is not clear to anyone: We will not be featuring Who Said What Now? until such a time that we can unprotect this article. In the meantime, please don't suggest featuring it, since such suggestions cannot be honored. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::I'm still thinking of doing a running gag. What was the Answering machine where Homestar and Strong Bad try to get their "girlfriends" a Valentines gift? I like that one.
+
-
:::I'm not sure, but I think this week we should feature [[Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 1.0]] since we've ''never'' featured a MAM before. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::I like that idea as well. MAM 1. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Sounds fine to me. We should consider featuring other MAMs soon, too. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Wow! What a Coincidence! New MAM! sbemailnum314159 15:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Yeah, isn't that great when stuff like that happens? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Yup. Though it does make the images on the main page look kind of redundant... {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 10]] (Mar 3-9)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
Haven't featured a character in a while. How about [[Frank Bennedetto]]? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Ooh, featuring a pseudocharacter. Sounds like a good idea to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::I like [[Frank Bennedetto]]. Or maybe [[The Battle of Strong Badia]]. [[User:Sbemailnum314159|Sbemailnum314159]] 01:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::I would rather not. A pseudocharacter we should save for later. Although I do like [[The Battle of Strong Badia]]. Let's feature that. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 19:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 11]] (Mar 10-16)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
Per the discussion page, how about [[Lappynapped!]]? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 03:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:All right, sounds like a fine idea. Note that this won't prevent us from also featuring [[retirement]] and/or [[cliffhangers]] someday should we choose to. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 12]] (Mar 17-23)===
+
==General discussion==
-
[[Astro-Lite 2600]]. [[User:124.181.65.132|124.181.65.132]] 09:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:For an entire week? I don't think it's nearly significant enough for that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::How about [[Where's The Cheat?]] It was the longest running toon for 5 years. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 17:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::Wait, this is Easter week (Easter is on the 23). So why not [[Eggs (toon)]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::I don't really think [[Eggs (toon)]] has sufficient content for an FA. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::::How about [[Tiny-Handed Strong Bad]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::::::[[Tiny-Handed Strong Bad]] is awesome! Let's feature him! {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 13]] (Mar 24-30)===
 
-
After looking at the FA history for this year and the nominations, it looks like we haven't yet featured a Strong Bad email.  I'd like to suggest [[comic]], the origin of [[TGS]]? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:Like I said earlier ijn the year, how about a daily featured article week with [[Compy 386]] emails. Just some classics: [[comic]], [[japanese cartoon]], [[dragon]], [[crazy cartoon]], [[personal favorites]], [[monument]], [[video games]], [[your friends]], [[invisibility]], [[time capsule]], [[monster truck]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::[[dragon]]'s already been featured, so it wouldn't include that. Some of those other ones may be significant enough to have a full week also ([[japanese cartoon]], possibly). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::I counted eleven emails in that list, unfortunately the week only has seven! :S.  However some of these (like [[japanese cartoon]]) have already been featured. Same goes with [[dragon]] and... I guess that's it.  However, we may have featured more than I know: [[HRWiki talk:Featured Article Selection#Milestone emails.]] is a talk section I'm still going by and I think a better week-long selection might be garnered from that list (perhaps not, perhaps a common theme like Compy 386 might be better? not sure.) Anywho, at least with [[japanese cartoon]], [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] isn't up to date (I remember updating the Milestone emails list) since I'm guessing lately we haven't been using that list for the nominations.  So I suspect there may be other emails we have featured that haven't been marked as "featured".  --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::I take back what I said. I can't find [[japanese cartoon]] in the FA history. Why the heck did I mark it!? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::: If that is the case, I would say [[japanese cartoon]] is long overdue as a featured article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Yeah, we should just feature [[japanese cartoon]] this week. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 19:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 14]] (Mar 31-Apr 6)===
 
-
Does [[April Fools' 2007]] have enough information to be a featured article? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 20:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:There ''was'' no April Fool's 2007. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::Oops. I mean [[April Fools' 2006]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 15]] (Apr 7-13)===
 
-
[[Trog-Cave]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 00:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:That article is far too short for featured status. May I suggest [[Biscuit Dough Hands Man]] instead? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 00:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 16]] (Apr 14-Apr 20)===
 
-
How 'bout [[History according to Strong Bad]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 
-
:[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 10|Already been featured]], albeit under a different title. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 
-
::Perhaps a pseudocharacter (see my reasons above). How about [[Drive-Thru Whale]] or [[Wagon Fulla Pancakes]]? We should save [[Frank Bennedetto]] until [[army]] comes out next year. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 19:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools