HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2867 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
{| style="background:#CFC; border: 1px dashed #090"
+
 
-
|-
+
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
-
| style="padding:10px" | '''Checklist for new Featured Article:'''
+
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].
 +
 
 +
==Checklist==
 +
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
-
==Discussion Archives==
+
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]</center>
+
-
==Weeklies==
+
==Discussion archives==
 +
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 21]] (May 21-27) ===
 
-
<s>'''[[montage]].'''</s> ''(see below)'' This one will require a bit of timing, and thus could be moved up or back depending on TBC's schedule, but we should feature this email when the release of email #173 is imminent. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Ooooh... montage on #email 173... I like it, but I believe the featured article changes on Sundays, and email #173 should be out most likely on either a Monday or Tuesday... So, I'd like to see it happen, but it may be too hard to do. If so, a rough estimate should suffice. I'm taking a wild random guess that estimate is somewhere around here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
::Well, it looks like #173 isn't going to happen by this week, but just a note about releasing montage alongside it: after #172 is out and we anticipate that #173 might be released, we could always wait 24 hours or so to begin that week's Featured Article. That is, have montage and another one ready, and begin the FA as soon as it's evident what the new update is going to be. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 13:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
+
==Featured Article Queue==
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
:::'Tis genius, I say! However, if there are three emails released in a row, I see this: Monday April 30, #171, Monday May 7, #172, and then Monday May 14, #173. Now, I estimate that it will be this week, or in the two weeks after, so to be honest, next week is a fairly good spot. But we'll adapt and plan around it.
+
===Redirects===
 +
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
 +
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
:::But, if 173 doesn't come out this week, or for a back-up article, I think we should do the ever so medium-length [[Strong Sad's iPod]]. Or if we want longer, I don't see [[Thnikkaman]] bolded on [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|the nomination page]]. Here comes the Featured Article... {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
::::"Thnikkarticle". Ow! My bad pun reflex! Anyway, I think Thnikkaman is a good choice. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 10:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Something that's not a character; we've featured two characters in a row. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::How about [[DNA Evidence (running gag)|DNA Evidence]]. The mystery would make a great featured article! {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
+
-
:::::::Too short, I think. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::How about [[Couch Mumbling]]? We just had another occurrence of it in [[underlings]], so it's relevant. Also, it's a good length, and it's a major running gag.  {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::By the way, there isn't even an '''email 172''' yet. And If we're gonna feature montage it doesn't have to be the week of email 173. At this time, many people are looking forward to 173 and will understand why montage is featured. And if we feature a different article and see sbemail 173 is gonna come out early on a Monday, we could quickly change it to montage. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 09:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::'''[[DELETED]]''' seems like a good choice. Anybody agree? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::I really like DELETED, the only problem is how little prose there is in the intro, as this is what would appear on the main page. If there's some way to expand this intro or incorporate other parts of the page in the writeup, I'd be all for this one. If not, Couch Mumbling seems good to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::How about we start about the history of DELETED and say a little bit about what E-mails Strong Bad deletes and the rest will tell itself. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 00:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::I rewrote and expanded the lead section for DELETED, but it may need some more work. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::::My vote would either be for DELETED or perhaps for [[-'d]].{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 22]] (May 28-Jun 3) ===
+
==Article discussions==
-
'''[[montage]].''' ''(see above)'' The time has come. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
 +
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Second. In fact, third. ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 20:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
::Completely necessary. Really, we've had consensus to do this for some weeks; we just didn't know when exactly. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:::Yup, agreed. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
==General discussion==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 23]] (Jun 4-10) ===
 
-
<s>'''[[The Paper]].'''</s> This one goes hand-in-hand with the above. (Yes, I know we already featured The Paper on week 47 of 2005.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:No Paper, as it was already featured. And I can also see a whole lot shinoligans going on the page with reverts after tons of new info is added. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::If not The Paper, how about '''[[Bear Holding A Shark]]''' since it hasn't been featured yet and it features an excellent writing choice. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
:::I could see re-featuring if email 173 results in a drastic change to the article, thus justifying putting the new info on the main page. But at this time we don't know if that will happen (remember, TBC may not actually have SB upgrade to an inkjet at all and may just dismiss it quickly). At any rate, I think it would be best for us not to re-feature immediately after 173: if there's no substantial change, it will not be worth re-featuring at all; if there is a substantial change, we'll likely need time for the dust to settle on the article, so to speak. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::Bear Holding a Shark seems a little short. Note to self: come up with a good suggestion for this week. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 09:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
I think it's time that [[Fonts]] got the spotlight for once. It's grown quite a bit. Anyone agree? ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 19:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I think it would be interesting to see a list-oriented page like [[Fonts]] or [[Sound Effects]] or something be featured. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 19:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::How about [[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]]. Since we already have Homsar nominated and is sort of related to Crap in a way I'm not sure. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
:::Re: [[Fonts]]: List-like articles can be hard to feature, but we managed it with [[Secret Pages]]. Can we come up with a similar summary of the list of fonts? Re:Homsar's speech: I still feel this article has too many stretches too much speculation to really count as some of our finest work. I am not comfortable with featuring it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::I agree with not featuring the Homsar speech patterns article. It's interesting, but not solid enough to be featured. About [[Fonts]] and [[Sound Effects]] &mdash; are we sure that those are complete and correct? I sometimes wonder about those pages, but I haven't poked around in them very much... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::The problem with lists such as [[Fonts]] is that, by their very nature, they are near-impossible to complete. The thing is, it's no more incomplete than any other article we've featured. ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 22:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I second [[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]], but only if Strong Bad doesn't upgrade, but looking at the end of #172, I think they'll keep their promise. Poor paper. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 22:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
: How about montage. But that's not all. If montage doesn't work, we do 6 more Emails for featured articles that week. Anybody agree, though I don't make much sence, since I don't know how to put this. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 19:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::montage will be featured the in week 22. As for dailies: I don't know if we really need another one of those yet, and I certainly wouldn't do sbemails for them (especially right after montage). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::I vote for [[-'d]].{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 18:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::-d is to minor and small. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
Hey guys and gals, in case we forget to write a new FA by the time it goes live on the main page, simply copy and paste the old FA into the new FA's page until the new one gets written, just so the main page doesn't look blank for half an hour. Stealthily yours, [[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
I like [[Bear holding a Shark]] (already suggested above). It's not short (certainly no shorter than some of the FA noms I sifted through before coming here). I bet I could make a nice write-up of it. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I think that will be fine. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::I could roll with BhaS. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]]
 
-
:::Whoops. Sorry, Heimi. I was going to write this a few hours ago, but the wiki was down. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 01:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 24]] (Jun 11-17) ===
 
-
Let's go with '''[[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]]''' for this week. I particularly like that article for proving that my 4th favorite character is not a complete nut case. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 04:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:As I've said above, I do not feel this article is FA material (see my reasoning in the discussion for week 23). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::I agree with Heimi. That article has too much speculation, still.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 04:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
How 'bout [[The King of Town's Castle]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 01:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Eh, not good writing in this <s>journalist's</s> wiki editor's opinion. How 'bout [[Craig Zobel]]? Not very long, but chock-full of interesting and not very well-known facts. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Hmm... it's a good try, but we normally don't feature articles that are that short; the summary would practically be the whole article. How about the [[Thnikkaman]]? &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 17:53, 4 June 2007
 
-
:::Yeah, shut up, kid! (Translation: I'm cool with Thnikkaman.) --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 21:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 25]] (Jun 18-24) ===
 
-
If we're going to keep featuring a CV each month this year, then let's feature [[Old-Timey Strong Bad]] this week. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Yeh, it's got good writing, an okay length. If there aren't any oppositions... {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 02:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::I couls not see that happening. I don't picture Old-Timey characters as featured articles. I suggest [[Sweet Cuppin' Cakes]]. I'm pretty suprised that's not a FA. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 00:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 19|No reason we can't feature Old-Timey characters.]] I'd say go with it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::I know that was a FA. I'm just think we should save Old-Timey Strong Bad for another time. Sweet Cuppin' Cakes has been long waiting for it to be a FA. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
'''[[The Paper]]'''. The time hath cometh. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Already been done. Let's not repeat ourselves before we have to. Which we probably never will. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::We already featured [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 23|2]] [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 24|characters]]. That's why I don't think Old-Timey characters, or any characters should be featured until 2 weeks. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::Last year we featured at least one character each month. I don't see what's wrong with doing that again. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 19:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 26]] (Jun 24-Jul 1) ===
 
-
I vote for [[Swimming Pool]]. A nice, Summer-themed article. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Long, pretty good writing, sure. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 02:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 27]] (Jul 2-8) ===
 
-
Let's honor our Founding Fathers and feature [[Happy Fireworks]]. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 02:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I always hate toon FAs. But, the only other things I could find were either too short or had bad writing. So, I'll live. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 02:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Why do you hate them? The toons are the biggest part of Homestar Runner, after all. The only problem I see with them is that it's kinda hard to write a good summary of the toon that will go on the Main Page. But if the toon is relevant to the week it's being featured in, I usually have no problem with having it as a featured article. That being said, I think Happy Fireworks is too short of a toon to be featured. With longer toons, the summary is easier to write because there's a lot to write about, but with shorter toons, there's not really much to explain, which makes a summary hard to write. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 02:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::OK... how about [[Dangeresque (film series)]]? I've always wanted to see that featured. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]]
 
-
::::I'd still go with Happy Fireworks. It is a bit short, but I still think a good summary could be made. It'll take a good three sentences just to explain cardboard Marzipan. We had actually planned to feature that article last year and somehow we [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2006_Weeks_21-30#HRWiki:Featured_article_for_2006.2C_week_28_.28Jul_10-16.29 got off by one week]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Said above, if it is relevant to the week, it is a good idea to have it. Just like when sbemail172 had comeout, Montage was the featured toon. --{{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 15:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 28]] (Jul 9-15) ===
 
-
Some Summer-themed ideas: [[Weclome Back]], [[keep cool]], [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 9]], [[suntan]], [[vacation]], [[Strong Bad's Vacation Spots]]. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]]
 
-
:This might not work out, but what about we have all those toons and write a featured article each day. Start with Weclome Back, keep cool, Teen Girl Squad Issue 9, suntan, vacation, Strong Bad's Vacation Spots and maybe add [[Summer Short Shorts]]. And if daily featured articles don't work, how about each one weekly. Anybody agree? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 5:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Then again, if we're going to feature [[Happy Fireworks]] the week before, then I say we feature [[Dangeresque (film series)]] this week. --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 21:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::I'm up for that. Any objections? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::I have an idea. How about [[Atari 2600]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29]] (Jul 16-22) ===
 
-
[[Kiddie Pool]], maybe? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Definitely not big enough. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 21:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::Note also that not everything has to be summer-themed. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::How 'bout [[some kinda robot]]? It's the very first Strong Bad Email, it introduces the Tandy, and it reveals that Strong Bad has a mask for a face and not a mask on his face. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 02:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::It's so brief, though. I think it'd be a good idea to feature that, but maybe sometime when we can do a set of weeklies including several moldy oldie emails. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::[[some kinda robot]], [[homsar]], [[i love you]], and [[i rule]] would be good ones to use for that. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 07:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::Plus [[spring cleaning]] and possibly [[tape-leg]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::What do people think about going ahead and doing an early-sbemailathlon this week? Or should we wait on this until later? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::I like the idea a lot. Also, [[trevor the vampire]] is a good candidate. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::::I think we should do a week of daily features. How about we use DNA evidence? We could do the [[strong badathlon|6]] [[unnatural|emails]] [[the movies|of]] [[your funeral|the]] [[from work|running]] [[rough copy|gag]], then the [[DNA Evidence|toon]]. Sound good? &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 19:09, 4 June 2007
 
-
::::::::::I still think old emails is the way to go. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 1]] ====
 
-
[[some kinda robot]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 2]] ====
 
-
[[homsar]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 3]] ====
 
-
[[i love you]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 4]] ====
 
-
[[i rule]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 5]] ====
 
-
[[spring cleaning]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 6]] ====
 
-
[[tape-leg]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
==== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29, day 7]] ====
 
-
[[trevor the vampire]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I was thinking something like [[band names]], or something. Introduced [[Limozeen]] and others, y'know. I was picking out some older emails that introduced important concepts/characters/stuff to the H*R universe. [[Homsar]] in [[homsar]], [[Strong Badia]] in [[i rule]], and so on. Yes? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 03:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 30]] (Jul 23-29) ===
 
-
I'm game for '''[[alternate universe]]''' this week or next. It needs to be featured in my opinion. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 02:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:<s>I think we should do a week of daily features. How about the [[strong badathlon|6]] [[unnatural|emails]] [[the movies|of]] [[your funeral|the]] [[from work|running]] [[rough copy|gag]], then the [[DNA Evidence|toon]]. Sound good? &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 19:09, 4 June 2007</s>
 
-
::Lemme point you to the week above: there's currently a discussion about doing dailies up there. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::[[alternate universe]] is good and probably deserves to be featured, but not this week if we're going to do the early sbemails the week before. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:19, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::Good call Heimi, seven e-mails is good enough for a span of probably more than a month. If we're going through with the above, why don't we do [[Double Deuce|Douuuuuuuuuuuuuuuble Deuce?]] --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Seems like a reasonable idea to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::::Sure, okay length, good writing, all that jazz. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General Discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
-
In order to make daily featured articles, create pages like:
+
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki>
 
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
Line 161: Line 127:
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 0]]</nowiki>
+
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this)
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 1]]</nowiki>
+
 
 +
[[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]]

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools