HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(autoreplace: A Death-Defying Decemberween → A Death Defying Decemberween)
 
(includes 2912 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
{| style="background:#CFC; border: 1px dashed #090"
+
 
-
|-
+
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
-
| style="padding:10px" | '''Checklist for new Featured Article:'''
+
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].
 +
 
 +
==Checklist==
 +
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
-
==Discussion Archives==
+
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]</center>
+
-
==Weeklies==
+
==Discussion archives==
 +
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 21]] (May 21-27) ===
 
-
<s>'''[[montage]].'''</s> ''(see below)'' This one will require a bit of timing, and thus could be moved up or back depending on TBC's schedule, but we should feature this email when the release of email #173 is imminent. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:Ooooh... montage on #email 173... I like it, but I believe the featured article changes on Sundays, and email #173 should be out most likely on either a Monday or Tuesday... So, I'd like to see it happen, but it may be too hard to do. If so, a rough estimate should suffice. I'm taking a wild random guess that estimate is somewhere around here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
::Well, it looks like #173 isn't going to happen by this week, but just a note about releasing montage alongside it: after #172 is out and we anticipate that #173 might be released, we could always wait 24 hours or so to begin that week's Featured Article. That is, have montage and another one ready, and begin the FA as soon as it's evident what the new update is going to be. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 13:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
+
==Featured Article Queue==
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
:::'Tis genius, I say! However, if there are three emails released in a row, I see this: Monday April 30, #171, Monday May 7, #172, and then Monday May 14, #173. Now, I estimate that it will be this week, or in the two weeks after, so to be honest, next week is a fairly good spot. But we'll adapt and plan around it.
+
===Redirects===
 +
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
 +
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
:::But, if 173 doesn't come out this week, or for a back-up article, I think we should do the ever so medium-length [[Strong Sad's iPod]]. Or if we want longer, I don't see [[Thnikkaman]] bolded on [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|the nomination page]]. Here comes the Featured Article... {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
::::"Thnikkarticle". Ow! My bad pun reflex! Anyway, I think Thnikkaman is a good choice. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 10:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Something that's not a character; we've featured two characters in a row. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::How about [[DNA Evidence (running gag)|DNA Evidence]]. The mystery would make a great featured article! {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
+
-
:::::::Too short, I think. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::How about [[Couch Mumbling]]? We just had another occurrence of it in [[underlings]], so it's relevant. Also, it's a good length, and it's a major running gag.  {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::By the way, there isn't even an '''email 172''' yet. And If we're gonna feature montage it doesn't have to be the week of email 173. At this time, many people are looking forward to 173 and will understand why montage is featured. And if we feature a different article and see sbemail 173 is gonna come out early on a Monday, we could quickly change it to montage. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 09:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::'''[[DELETED]]''' seems like a good choice. Anybody agree? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::I really like DELETED, the only problem is how little prose there is in the intro, as this is what would appear on the main page. If there's some way to expand this intro or incorporate other parts of the page in the writeup, I'd be all for this one. If not, Couch Mumbling seems good to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::How about we start about the history of DELETED and say a little bit about what E-mails Strong Bad deletes and the rest will tell itself. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 00:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::I rewrote and expanded the lead section for DELETED, but it may need some more work. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::::My vote would either be for DELETED or perhaps for [[-'d]].{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 21:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 22]] (May 28-Jun 3) ===
+
==Article discussions==
-
'''[[montage]].''' ''(see above)'' The time has come. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
 +
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Second. In fact, third. ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 20:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
::Completely necessary. Really, we've had consensus to do this for some weeks; we just didn't know when exactly. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:::Yup, agreed. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
+
==General discussion==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 23]] (Jun 4-10) ===
 
-
<s>'''[[The Paper]].'''</s> This one goes hand-in-hand with the above. (Yes, I know we already featured The Paper on week 47 of 2005.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:No Paper, as it was already featured. And I can also see a whole lot shinoligans going on the page with reverts after tons of new info is added. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::If not The Paper, how about '''[[Bear Holding A Shark]]''' since it hasn't been featured yet and it features an excellent writing choice. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
:::I could see re-featuring if email 173 results in a drastic change to the article, thus justifying putting the new info on the main page. But at this time we don't know if that will happen (remember, TBC may not actually have SB upgrade to an inkjet at all and may just dismiss it quickly). At any rate, I think it would be best for us not to re-feature immediately after 173: if there's no substantial change, it will not be worth re-featuring at all; if there is a substantial change, we'll likely need time for the dust to settle on the article, so to speak. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::Bear Holding a Shark seems a little short. Note to self: come up with a good suggestion for this week. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 09:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
I think it's time that [[Fonts]] got the spotlight for once. It's grown quite a bit. Anyone agree? ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 19:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I think it would be interesting to see a list-oriented page like [[Fonts]] or [[Sound Effects]] or something be featured. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 19:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::How about [[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]]. Since we already have Homsar nominated and is sort of related to Crap in a way I'm not sure. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
:::Re: [[Fonts]]: List-like articles can be hard to feature, but we managed it with [[Secret Pages]]. Can we come up with a similar summary of the list of fonts? Re:Homsar's speech: I still feel this article has too many stretches too much speculation to really count as some of our finest work. I am not comfortable with featuring it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::I agree with not featuring the Homsar speech patterns article. It's interesting, but not solid enough to be featured. About [[Fonts]] and [[Sound Effects]] &mdash; are we sure that those are complete and correct? I sometimes wonder about those pages, but I haven't poked around in them very much... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::::The problem with lists such as [[Fonts]] is that, by their very nature, they are near-impossible to complete. The thing is, it's no more incomplete than any other article we've featured. ¤ {{User:The Mu/sig}} 22:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I second [[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]], but only if Strong Bad doesn't upgrade, but looking at the end of #172, I think they'll keep their promise. Poor paper. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 22:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
: How about montage. But that's not all. If montage doesn't work, we do 6 more Emails for featured articles that week. Anybody agree, though I don't make much sence, since I don't know how to put this. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 19:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::montage will be featured the in week 22. As for dailies: I don't know if we really need another one of those yet, and I certainly wouldn't do sbemails for them (especially right after montage). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::I vote for [[-'d]].{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 18:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::::-d is to minor and small. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
 
-
Hey guys and gals, in case we forget to write a new FA by the time it goes live on the main page, simply copy and paste the old FA into the new FA's page until the new one gets written, just so the main page doesn't look blank for half an hour. Stealthily yours, [[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
I like [[Bear holding a Shark]] (already suggested above). It's not short (certainly no shorter than some of the FA noms I sifted through before coming here). I bet I could make a nice write-up of it. &mdash;[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:I think that will be fine. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 24]] (Jun 11-17) ===
 
-
Let's go with '''[[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]]''' for this week. I particularly like that article for proving that my 4th favorite character is not a complete nut case. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 04:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:As I've said above, I do not feel this article is FA material (see my reasoning in the discussion for week 23). {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
::I agree with Heimi. That article has too much speculation, still.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 04:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
:::How 'bout [[The King of Town's Castle]]? --[[User:Trogga|Trogga]] 01:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 25]] (Jun 18-24) ===
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 26]] (Jun 24-Jul 1) ===
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 27]] (Jul 2-8) ===
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 28]] (Jul 9-15) ===
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 29]] (Jul 16-22) ===
 
-
 
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 30]] (Jul 23-29) ===
 
-
 
-
==General Discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
-
In order to make daily featured articles, create pages like:
+
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki>
 
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki>
Line 102: Line 127:
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki>
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 0]]</nowiki>
+
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this)
-
*<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 1]]</nowiki>
+
 
 +
[[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]]

Current revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2022

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools