|
|
| (includes 3351 intermediate revisions) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | <div id="shortcut" style="border: 1px dashed blue; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; float: right; clear: both;"> | + | <div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center"> |
| - | Shortcuts:<br />[[HRWiki:FAS]], [[FAS]]</div>
| + | '''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.''' |
| - | ==Discussion Archives==
| + | </div> |
| - | <center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
| + | {{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}} |
| - | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]</center> | + | |
| | | | |
| - | ==Weeklies==
| + | [[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 21]] (May 22-28) ===
| + | Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]]. |
| - | How about [[Crapfully Yours]]? Seems like a sure bet to me. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 03:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :I want something other than a character or a gag. I watched [[Cool Things]] today... I forgot how ''awexome'' that toon [[HR:coolthings.html|really is]]. We should make a synopsis of it and make it the FA (and super-duper fix-up the article to make it an excellent representative article). —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 03:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::I concur its awexomeness, but should it really be a FA so soon? {{User:LePorello/sig}} 04:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::Sure, everybody's forgotten about it by now. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 04:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::You've got a great point. I love [[Cool Things]] too. 61.3-38.7 in favor. Full decision later. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::Either [[Cool Things]] or [[Bug In Mouth Disease]]. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::I'm thinking maybe a computer such as [[Compy 386|The Compy]] or [[Lappy 486|The Lappy]]. Neither have been a featured article. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 03:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::I suggest we feature the Compy the previous week and one of the two suggested toons this week. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 12:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::I say we do a sbemail. We haven't done one in a really long time. {{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 00:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::We've ''never'' done a SBEmail as a feature. I do like [[Cool Things]]. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 22:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::Although both toons are pretty kick-awesome, I happen to like [[Bug in Mouth Disease]] a ''tiny'' bit more than [[Cool Things]]. Just a personal decision. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 22:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::::If we are definitely going for one of the toons, then I have to say [[Cool Things]]. Otherwise, we should do [[Compy 386|the Compy]]. {{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 22:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::::That's two for [[Cool Things]], and two for [[Bug in Mouth Disease]]. We're getting behind again, so we need to pick one soon. {{unsigned|ACupOfCoffee|15:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)}}
| + | |
| - | I'm in favor of one of the big toons, but perhaps a slightly older one rather than a recent toon? Perhaps [[The Reddest Radish]], or one of the other underdogs? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 20:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :If not a new one, then [[A Jorb Well Done]] would be my vote. {{User:LePorello/sig}} 21:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::[[Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon]]. The longest and best full toon featuring the whole main characters.
| + | |
| - | It's looking like Cool Things has the most support. Bug in Mouth is also a fan favorite, but—hopefully not sounding biased here—more people seem okay with Cool Things. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 20:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Cool Things gets my vote {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 20:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 22]] (May 29-Jun 4) === | + | ==Checklist== |
| - | We haven't featured any places in a while, so how about [[The King of Town's Castle]] or [[The Office]]? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 06:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}} |
| - | :I agree on the Places Idea but a more popular place would be nice (we should really hurry up production on this one) {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 22:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard. |
| - | Ooh! It should definitely be [[The Office]]. Great location, great article, and great show. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 02:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache]. |
| - | ::Either of them will be a fine FA. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image. |
| - | How about [[Peasantry]]? Good article, nice location, and everyone loves [[Trogdor]]! If not then [[The Office]]. [[User:DumbMuscle|DumbMuscle]] 11:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up. |
| - | :Maybe Peasantry the week after. We've already got two fine candidates here. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page. |
| - | ::I thought you were talking about a different office. Sure! {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 14:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history]. |
| | + | *Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary — see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history]. |
| | + | |}<br/> |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 23]] (Jun 5-11) === | + | ==Discussion archives== |
| | + | <center> |
| | + | {| {{standardtable}} |
| | + | ! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2005 |
| | + | | |
| | + | | |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2006 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2007 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2008 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2009 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2010 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2011 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | | 2012 |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]] |
| | + | | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]] |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| - | It occurs to me that we could perhaps have a themed feature around this week, something to do with the end of school. [[senior prom]] is an obvious choice, it's a bit early to feature that, and especially as our first Sbemail. I'd be happy with either another promish idea, or perhaps an article regarding Summer. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 01:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| |
| - | :Right. Certainly not senior prom, but I like the direction you're heading. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 01:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| - | ::And the Yearbook was not long ago. I'll think what else could be put here. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | |
| - | :::Maybe [[The Luau]]? That has sort of a summer-y feel... --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] | |
| | + | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]] |
| | + | </center> |
| | | | |
| - | :End of school? I've been out for two weeks, and my siblings have their last day tomorrow (speaking from a frame of reference that it's still Wednesday, even though it's after midnight). But, on to buisness: Maybe [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 3]] or [[suntan]]. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 06:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | ==Featured Article Queue== |
| - | ::I'm still going to be in school when this comes out :) {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 18:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | {| {{standardtable}} |
| - | :I'm thinking [[suntan]] would be a nice summer-style article that I wouldn't mind making a write-up for. The only concern is that we featured another toon only two weeks ago, but whatcha gonna do? —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 18:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | ! Week !! Article !! Discussion |
| - | ::I don't think suntan is a good first email article. I was thinking more to the lines of [[some kinda robot]], [[50 emails]], [[flashback]], [[alternate universe]], etc. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 18:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}} |
| - | :::The whole summer idea was just a tentative idea, but it seems that no perfect article really sprang to mind. We could go with [[some kinda robot]], to kick off the Sbemail genre. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}} |
| - | ::::Personally, I don't think [[some kinda robot]] is interesting enough for a featured article (although I do appreciate the symmetry of it being the first featured sbemail as well as the first actual sbemail), I'd suggest a milestone email such as the ones suggested, or [[rock opera]] -- [[User:DumbMuscle|DumbMuscle]] 19:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}} |
| - | :::::After reviewing the emails, I think the first one should be [[flashback]]: Long, good commentary, have a DVD related subpage, reference to old material, very good and informative fun facts and a milestone. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 18:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | {{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death Defying Decemberween}} |
| - | ::::::Well, I am going to be busy most all of tomorrow, so someone is going to have to step up and write it in the next... 22 hours. I don't know if Thunderbird will be able to, either. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 01:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |} |
| - | :::::::I could take a crack at it, if you like... Just tell me when to make it live. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | |
| - | ::::::::It's not exclusive (this isn't admins only; whoever wants to help out each week, please do). Just make a nice write-up of something, then make the article as perfect as you can. Hit the cache purge button on [[Talk:Main Page]] at 00:00 UTC Monday (Sunday, 8 PM EDT, 5 PM PDT; that's in 21.5 hours). —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 02:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::I wrote up one on [[flashback]], a la E.L. Cool's suggestion. How's it look? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 24]] (Jun 12-18) === | + | ===Redirects=== |
| | + | This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: |
| | + | <pre> |
| | + | {{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}} |
| | + | </pre> |
| | + | Example: |
| | + | <pre> |
| | + | {{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}} |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| - | We could have the June character around here, which do you think is next in line? I would guess [[Strong Sad]]. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 01:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well. |
| - | :Weren't we originally going in order of introduction? Didn't Bubs and Coach Z debut before Strong Sad? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | ::It was semi-discussed [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20#HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 12 (Mar 20-26)|here]], with the general feeling being that we've already gone against who debuted first, by having Strong Bad second. It's more in order of general popularity and how often they're used. In my opinion, that puts Homestar and Strong Bad decidedly first and second, and [[The King of Town]], [[The Poopsmith]], and [[Homsar]] 10th, 11th, and 12th, respectively. Besides that, the middle four of [[Strong Mad]], [[Strong Sad]], [[Bubs]], and [[Coach Z]] are kind of up in the air so to speak, since they're all kind of middle characters. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | ==Article discussions== |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 25]] (Jun 19-25) === | + | == Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion == |
| - | I think a running gag would fit in this week or the following quite nicely. Possibly, [[DELETED]] or [[How Do You Type With Boxing Gloves On?]] {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 01:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.'' |
| - | :I like [[How Do You Type With Boxing Gloves On?]]. It get's my vote. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 13:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::It gets mine as well. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 15:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :I prefer [[DELETED]] personally, I think the boxing gloves article strays from the point a bit (referring to other things SB does which would be hard in gloves) [[User:DumbMuscle|DumbMuscle]] 18:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::A bit thin though, don't you think? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 22:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | :::I like [[How Do You Type With Boxing Gloves On?]], too. {{User:FireBird/sig}} 03:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | ==Stalled Discussions== |
| - | ::::Is everybody happy with How Do You Type With Boxing Gloves On? --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 21:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | + | :''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. '' |
| - | :::::Think so {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 21:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::Then I'll go ahead and base it. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 21:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 26]] (Jun 26-28) === | + | ==General discussion== |
| - | How about something that isn't a nown. Howabout [[Characters' Contacts]]? --{{User:The thing/sig}} 11:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | :I don't think that has enough information to be a featured article. {{User:FireBird/sig}} 03:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)=== |
| | + | In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like: |
| | | | |
| - | ::And it is a [[Wikipedia:Noun|noun]]. In fact, it's two of them. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki> |
| - | | + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki> |
| - | :::That's being just a bit pedantic, we know roughly what he meant (a non-main feature/toon/character/place/joke article), although I do agree that [[Characters' Contacts]] is a bit short, how about [[Integral Article]]? -- [[User:DumbMuscle|DumbMuscle]] 21:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]</nowiki> |
| - | | + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]</nowiki> |
| - | ::::I'm happy with Integral article. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki> |
| - | | + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki> |
| - | :::::All it needs now is a good image. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 16:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | *<nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]]</nowiki> (redirect day 7 to this) |
| - | ::::::I added one. It's a difficult thing to show, so I went with Teen Girl Squad, as their speech is also text. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
| + | |
| - | :::::::All right, I created it. How's that? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 18:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 27]] (Jun 29-Jul 2) ===
| + | |
| - | My vote's on [[Podstar Runner]]. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 19:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Became an integral part of the site, regularly updated. It get's my vote. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::Looks like a good article to me. {{User:FireBird/sig}} 03:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 28]] (Jul 3-9) ===
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | We could have a character around here too, possibly [[Strong Mad]] to finish off the Strongs? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 01:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :OK. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 20:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :Ooh, ooh! [[Happy Fireworks]]! This would be appropriate as it'll be the Fourth of July. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 04:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29]] (Jul 10-16) ===
| + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 1]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 2]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 3]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 4]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 5]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 6]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 29, day 7]] | + | |
| - | *[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 30, day 1]]
| + | |
| - | I would like to see another Article of the Day thing. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 19:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :I would like to see anything suggested first. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 04:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::If we're doing an Article of the Day thing, I suggest:
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Toons Menu]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Scrolling Shooter Games Menu]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Character Videos]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Downloads]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Store]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Email]]
| + | |
| - | ::*[[Museum]]
| + | |
| - | ::In that order. If we're just doing an Article of the Week, I suggest [[Senor Cardgage]]. A big page with lots of info about an interesting character. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 20:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::I like the daily idea, and that list seems good, it gets my vote! [[User:DumbMuscle|DumbMuscle]] 22:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::I think that's an okay idea. I've set up the base setup for the switchover, leaving seven red links up there for the articles. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 23:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | === [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2006, week 30]] (Jul 17-23) ===
| + | |
| - | This one as to be a [[Holiday Toons]] or something. It would fit here. --{{User:The thing/sig}} 11:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :[[Talk:Holidays|It's already been featured]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::[[The Brothers Chaps]]? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 18:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::Also already featured. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::Here's a great page that hasn't been featured: [[The Brothers Chaps' Fansite Acknowledgments]]. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 21:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::[[Crap]]? {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 20:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::Crap is a good page. but is it complete? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::I sure think so. {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 04:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::You think it's crap, or you think it's complete?? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:11, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | :::::::::Complete {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 05:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | ::::::::::Actually, provided we do a Fourth of July themed feature, what about moving [[Strong Mad]] to this week? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 23:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | ==General Discussion==
| + | |
| - | ===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
| + | |
| - | In order to switch to and from daily featured articles, follow these simple steps:
| + | |
| | | | |
| - | <blockquote>'''1)''' Create pages like:<br>
| + | [[Category:Featured article maintenance|Selection]] |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 7]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 2]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''2)''' Create a redirect to begin with, such as <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50]] redirecting to [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | once it's switched over...<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''3)''' Change the main page text 'This Week's Featured Article' to 'Today's Featured Article'.<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''4)''' Change the main page link to: <br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <code><nowiki>{{HRWiki:Featured article for {{CURRENTYEAR}}, week {{CURRENTWEEK}}</nowiki><span style="color:darkred">, day <nowiki>{{</nowiki>CURRENTDOW}}</span>}}</code><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | once it's ready to be finished...<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''5)''' Create a redirect to end with, such as <nowiki>[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51, day 3]] redirecting to [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 51]]</nowiki><br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | '''6)''' Change the main page link back to:<br>
| + | |
| - | <br>
| + | |
| - | <code><nowiki>{{HRWiki:Featured article for {{CURRENTYEAR}}, week {{CURRENTWEEK}}}}</nowiki></code></blockquote><br>
| + | |
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
