HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→HRwiki:Featured article for 2010, week 30 (Jul 26-Aug 2): "I'm buying you a pizza.")
(with the notice we can also restore the old text, update notice)
(includes 934 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
 +
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
 +
</center>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
 +
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
 +
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
 +
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
 +
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death-Defying Decemberween}}
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
===Redirects===
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]] |
+
<pre>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]] |
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
+
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_1-10|2010, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
[[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection/Discussion_Archive_2010_Weeks_11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
+
-
</center>
+
==Article discussions==
==Article discussions==
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 20]] (May 17-23)===
 
-
Five years since the first featured article! Maybe we should do something special to mark the occasion? [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] 07:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:Sorry, I can't really think of anything. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::I was thinking maybe [[Index Page]], the most imprtant page on the site (not really, but it's often the first page that one looks at on the site), or an early toon like [[Pom Pom Too]], or one of the earliest articles to be suggested as a featured article: [[Schenactady Crispies]], or, as has been mentioned a couple of times not long ago: [[homestarrunner.com]]. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::I don't know. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::So, the new main page did not appear until {{pl|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&diff=next&oldid=86323 May 23, 2005}} which was the first day of [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 21|week 21]] on 2005 (see [[Wikipedia:ISO_week_date|ISO_week_date]]). I see that this year that date falls on Week 20 (after getting this wrong {{pl|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection&diff=700126&oldid=700125&rcid=660875 a couple}} {{pl|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection&diff=700128&oldid=700127&rcid=660877 of times}}). If it's that important, we can just [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 21|re-feature]] [[Homestar Runner (body of work)|Homestar Runner]] as a one-time retro-feauture with a short and subtle 1-line message saying that we've been doing 5 years of FAs.  For some reason I feel it would be nice to do this on week 21 rather than week 20 (and match the week numbers).  Otherwise, I think we should really treat this like any other FA week.  Looking at the oft-ignored [[HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations|nominations page]] I see that we have never featured [[Parsnips A-Plenty]] and it might be due for a feature. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::I suggest [[Museum]]. It just seem fitting for 5 years, I guess it's the title. {{User:Nova Scotia/sig}} 20:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::Look before you leap. [[Museum]] ''has'' [[HRWiki:Featured_articles/Archive_3#Week_29.2C_2006.2C_Day_7|been featured]] already. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 21:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::I don't think the anniversary of FAs is significant enough to merit an article celebrating it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::Maybe not, but still, can we do any of the ideas that either I or Stux suggested? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 11:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:In preparation of next week's FA and after going through the Nominations page I noticed something old that hasn't been featured yet: How about [[sisters]]? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 01:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::Sorry, but it's too soon after we last featured an e-mail. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::Ummm, it's nearly time, so we need more input. And my question above hasn't been answered. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::IT'S GOING TO BE SOON! CAN WE HAVE SOME MORE FEEDBACK?! {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::That will quite enough panicking and shouting. Doje hapjok. OK. Here are my thoughts: I agree that it's too early to feature another email at this point, though [[sisters]] would be a good one for the future. [[Pom Pom, Too]] is a fascinating idea in one sense, but I think it may be too short for a decent writeup. I'm thinking going ahead with [[Parnsips A-Plenty]] could be our best plan at this point. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I have an idea: why don't we try for [[Sterrance]], which was proposed last week before being bumped in favor of a list of Dangeresque characters? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::I think [[Parsnips A-Plenty]] works for this week. As for Sterrance, why don't we just move him to the next week? There isn't really a discussion right below, so I think it would work. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 19:14, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::These two weeks flew by waaay too quickly!  As for the FA, I've tentatively copied the [[Sterrance]] text but I'd rather see Parsnips since there isn't much content on the former article.  However, I gotta sit down and watch it again before summarizing as it's been a while since I've seen it.  I wanted to be sure we had something before the UTC changeover.  --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::::Why don't we just go ahead with that for this week and shove Parsnips down to next week, where there's no result yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 21]] (May 24-30)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
[[Missy Palmer]]? [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] [[User talk:RickTommy|talk]] [[Image:slang.PNG|50px]] 01:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Missy Palmer's important to H*R, but that article's seriously lacking in content. At present, it wouldn't work for a weeklong feature. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
+
-
[[Lookin at a Thing in a Bag]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
+
-
We were talking before about putting Sterrance here if we featured Parsnips-A-Plenty the week before. Since it appears we're doing Sterrance the week before instead, let's move Parsnips-A-Plenty here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
+
==Stalled Discussions==
 +
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 22]] (May 31-Jun 6)===
+
==General discussion==
-
How about a Videlectrix game? We have available: [[Secret Collect]], [[Rhino Feeder]], [[Thy Dungeonman]], [[Population: Tire]], [[Pigs on Head]], [[Thy Dungeonman 2]], [[50K Racewalker]], [[Duck Guardian One]], and [[Thy Dungeonman 3]]. [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] [[User talk:RickTommy|talk]] [[Image:slang.PNG|50px]] 01:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:Based on the ones listed here, I would say [[Population: Tire]] is probably the best bet. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
+
-
::I'd pick one of the Thy Dungeonman games.
+
-
:::Either Pop Tire or a Dungeonman game would probably be good choices. Can't decide which I prefer at this point. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
+
-
:::I always thought [[Retro Gaming Character Variations]] was an interesting article. But out of the games, I think Thy Dungeonman games have more information. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 00:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 23]] (Jun 7-13)===
 
-
For this week, how about the [[jibblies]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 24]] (Jun 14-20)===
 
-
For this week, how about [[Strong Bad's Computer Malfunctioning]]? We could have the intro and all the little descriptions after it, sort of like [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 26|that article on characters lacking certain body parts]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 25]] (Jun 21-27)===
 
-
How about [[The Reddest Radish]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:While this is (once again) over the limit of ten, there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus in some of the nominations above. Why not contribute your opinion there first instead of adding more weeks? {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 00:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
I agree with Strong Awesome in that you should discus other things before bringing up something else. On a more related note, I don't really like the idea of featuring Reddish Raddish, but I don't know what we could replace it with. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:I came up with something: [[404'd]]. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
::Nevermind. That needs expansion. How abut [[Homestar Ruiner]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:::If we were to do individual SBCG4AP episodes, they should be done in increments at a time. Instead, might I propose something that had been proposed before, but got bumped off by something else: [[Sterrance]], but not Da Huuuuuuuudge, since the former appeared more often than the latter, and it was the one SB claimed to have gotten right. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::Sterrance sounds good. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 26]] (Jun 28-Jul 4)===
 
-
[[Cardboard Marzipan]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 10:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:What did the man say to you above? --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water|Essence of Ghost Water]] 12:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::At this point, we're exactly 10 weeks out, so he's OK this time. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 12:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
:::Oh. Anyhow, Cardboard Mazipan is a good choice. It's certainly better than [[Cardboard Homestar]]. --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water|Essence of Ghost Water]] 12:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
::::While Heim's right and he's ok within the 10-week limit, [[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]], why don't you give others a chance to make initial suggestions during the new few FA weeks for a change?  There is no need to rush the FA process and you should give others a chance to weigh in their suggestions without them feeling rushed or like they need to follow a specific topic.  Thanks. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 27]] (Jul 5-11)===
 
-
[[New Paper]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 28]] (Jul 12-18)===
 
-
[[Li'l Brudder]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
Spotlight hogger. :P
 
-
That aside, Lil Brudder is a good idea. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 29]] (Jul 19-25)===
 
-
We usually feature a Sbemail around this time. How about either [[rock opera]], [[bottom 10]], [[your friends]], [[death metal]], or [[different town]]? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 00:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
You know, there's not much consensus on anything else. If you're so eager to get things done, I request you help with the others before you throw something else out. <br><br>Yeah, we could do bottom 10. {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:And we need to keep this list below ten. And let someone else come up with an idea sometimes, please! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 30]] (Jul 26-Aug 2)===
 
-
It does end on August 2nd, right? Anyways, how about [[Everybody to the Limit]]? {{User:Power Pie/sig}}
 
-
:That'd be a good one. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]]
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2013

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death-Defying Decemberween discussion

Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

Article discussions

Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

General discussion

Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools