HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Discussion archives)
(with the notice we can also restore the old text, update notice)
(includes 1676 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
-
 
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 11]] (Mar 9-15)===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
I think for this week, we should do something like the [[Storybook World]] from whence the whole thing got started. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:How 'bout... THE 2009 WEEK OF ALL OF THE ROOMS IN THE HOUSE OF STRONG EXTRAVAGANZA!!!!!!!! Or at least the first 7. {{User:Don't say jorb 101/sig}}
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
::How do we do that? Let's do Storybook World or [[email thunder]]. {{User:Raiku/sig}} 06:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
:::Yeah, we should definitely do [[email thunder]] sometime this year, but not yet. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
::::A response to Raiku: they only do this a few times per year, but sometimes,instead of a weekly featured article, they have a daily featured article, where every day there's a new one. They usually are related, hence the "THE 2009 WEEK OF ALL OF THE ROOMS IN THE HOUSE OF STRONG EXTRAVAGANZA!!!!!!!!" {{User:Don't say jorb 101/sig}}
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death-Defying Decemberween}}
-
:::::That's not what- nevermind. I'd rather do Storybook. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 22:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
+
|}
-
::::::And on top of that, Raiku, we've done the [[Computer Room]] already, if I remember correctly. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Eh well, Storybook's a bit short, but it's significant, so why not. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Seems a bit TOO short for an FA in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::What if instead of the rather short Storybook World, we do [[The Homestar Runner Enters the Strongest Man in the World Contest]]?  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 06:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::I'm afraid that one's already been featured. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::oops, you're right... I looked for it under the wrong name.  In that case I'll go with Storybook World.  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 07:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::OK, looks like Storybook World it is. Anyone who happens to have any ideas for expanding it, that would be really great, though we can live with it as is if it must be so. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 12]] (Mar 16-22)===
+
===Redirects===
-
This week, let's deau a game. I'm thinkin' of doing [[Population: Tire]]. Any other ideas? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 00:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:Well, I guess, except how much description here could be used? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::Pop tire doesn't really have a very good description for it.  I think that [[Eh! Steve!]] deserves recognition this week.  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Oh, yes! We've ''never'' done a Sweet Cuppin' Cakes character before! The only thing about SSC that we've done for an article was the area itself. And that was only last year! So yeah, it's time that this often-overlooked area of Homestar got more due. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::OK, let's do Eh, Steve! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 22:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
:::::The prose introduction for Eh, Steve! as it stands is really too short for an FA. Anyone think we could expand that? I agree it's a very worthy topic, but it's not really ready for featuring right now. We still have nearly two months until this week; can someone remedy that? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::::::Well, then, why not a [[Cheat Commandos]] character? It's been a while since we've done one. I'm thinking maybe either [[Fightgar]] or [[Silent Rip]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
:::::::Fightgar works well. I'm all for it. {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 02:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::::::Adding more "oomph" to the Eh, Steve! article isn't that big of a challenge.  I could probably do it this afternoon or something.  Let's just stick to the consensus we've reached here and put off Fightgar for a different week. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 01:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::I think Eh! Steve's article is a little more fleshed out. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::It looks workable now. Let's put Fightgar in the queue for soon. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 13]] (Mar 23-29)===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
I think for this week, we should do [[The King of Town DVD]], one of the ''earliest'' big toons on the entire site! [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Yes... an early '''''big''''' toon... *ahem* -still, it is important, in it's own way. No objections. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 20:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::KOT's DVD sounds pretty good.  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Strong Bad's commentary on that one is still a classic bit of Strong Bad comedy. We could mention that in the writeup, probably. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 14]] (Mar 30-Apr 5)===
+
==Article discussions==
-
I think for this week, we should have [[Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 14.2]], in which one of the messages, from [[Strong Sad]], is on April Fools' Day pranks. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Well, since this ''is'' April Fool's week, [[Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 14.2|and, um, we should... crap. What was that one article? I was gonna mention that one article on something... about... something... Aw, nevermind. If I think of it, I won't call you back.]] {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::That is still one of the most bizarre messages Marzy's ever gotten. I'm all about Main Paging it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 10:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 15]] (Apr 6-12)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
I think it's finally time to feature [[email thunder]]. With full-length hremails about, I think we should feature their origin. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 16:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:Well, while I do agree that email thunder needs to be featured soon, I think that, this week, with it supposedly being Spring Break for many people, we should do [[The Luau]], something that a lot of people have been clamoring for. Maybe we can do email thunder next week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Yes, this week seems quite a bit better for [[The Luau]] than the one I proposed. I'm all for it.  {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 06:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 16]] (Apr 13-19)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
For this week, I think we should do another live appearance by something TBC-related: [[TMBG Concert - 3 May 2006|a concert by TMBG, only this time from 2006]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 07:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:I think [[Hremails]] deserve a shot. By the time this article's date rolls around, ther'll be plenty of them (hopefully). {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 23:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Key word: hopefully. I'm not a nonbeliever, but by the small chance that it doesn't continue very far, we better save that nomination until then. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 02:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Unfortunately, the TMBG Concert - 3 May 2006 page is rather short and contains little information, as well as having no good quality pictures.  I think that [[Fightgar]], an idea proposed a couple weeks back, deserves to be featured. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::How about [[Bug In Mouth Disease]] because it has most inside references in it and it's really funny to watch.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 02:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Bug in Mouth Disease has [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2007, week 4|already been done]]. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 02:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Reply to GuardDuck: I want to do another live appearance by something TBC-related that had pictures, and after a search, the TMGB concert came to mind. Maybe if we were to expand the intro somewhat, that could help. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I'm afraid I have to agree that this article isn't really suitable for featuring at this point. The info on the appearance is just too sparse at this point. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Okay, then how about [[ROFLCon - 26 Apr 2008|TBC's trip to ROFLCon in 2008]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 17]] (Apr 20-26)===
+
==General discussion==
-
For this week, we should do the email [[50 emails]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:I agree that 50 emails definitely needs featuring sometime soon, but there seems to have been quite a clamor for [[email thunder]] over the past few weeks, and I think we need to do that one sooner rather than later. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::All right, I guess we can do [[email thunder]] this week, but can we do "50 emails" before this year is up? After all, I believe that's what somewhat started the whole email anniversary phenomenon. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 18]] (Apr 27-May 3)===
 
-
For this week, how about doing one on [[Hremails]], especially in the wake of [[email thunder]], regardless of what's happening on Week 17. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:Hremails sounds fine to me. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 01:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::Me, too.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 12:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 19]] (May 4-10)===
 
-
This week I thought we could to [[Ballad of the Sneak]]. It's an important toon, one of the more famous Old Timey ones, and I think it's unique in that it showcases more collaboration between the Chaps and external parties. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:I suppose that one would work, but if we were to do that one, we should also do first [[The Cheat Theme Song]], which is just as important if not more so. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::The Cheat Theme Song is probably more important as it launched a new spin-off. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 23:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 20]] (May 11-17)===
 
-
For this week, we should have another Cheat Commandos character: [[Fightgar]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2013

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death-Defying Decemberween discussion

Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

Article discussions

Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

General discussion

Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"