HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 2 (Jan 5-11): Not so fast)
(with the notice we can also restore the old text, update notice)
(includes 1861 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
-
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured article nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_article_nominations&action=history history].
+
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]  
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 47]] (Nov 17-23) ===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
For this week, let's make it [[Don and Harriet Chapman]], Mike and Matt's parents. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:To me, it looks the article is just a little short to featured. (Unfortunately, I can't think of something else to put here.) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
::The question is CAN it be added on to, with the available information we have? {{User:Lazylaces/sig}} 14:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
:::I don't think there's really anything else we know that's not already there. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
::::And I think there is a reasonable amount of text there anyway. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 05:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death-Defying Decemberween}}
-
:::::This one's really borderline, especially since there's no appearances section to help fill out the end. It could be done, I think; I just wish there were more content. But as I've said, I don't think there's any more available. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
+
|}
-
::::::Well, I just thought that A) we need to do more actual people in TBC's lives, and B) I think the people who actually helped to make TBC possible deserve someplace to be mentioned. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I think we should definitely feature a real live person for this week, but the question is still who, becasue there are some people saying the [[Don and Harriet Chapman]] is too short. {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Well, having seen the article, I think that Don and Harriet Chapman is doable, partly because that one has a reasonable amount of text anyway. Mind you, a little more would be good, but we do have something reasonable. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Now I have a suggestion. Since we sometimes do a sbemail related to a holiday one week before the holiday ([[what I want]] for example), as suggested by MHarrington, how about we do [[colonization]] this week? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::Okay, we can do that, I suppose. Anyone else want to support this? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::Yeah, let's do that instead. Then we can move Don and Harriet down to the first week of December like you said. {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::Incidentally, this would make for a first time we did two T-Day FAs: in the past, that's been just for H'ween and D'ween in the past. Not that we can't do it this time. My only concern is that it could leave us a bit short on T-Day FAs for the future. But we can hope TBC will provide us some more soon, I guess. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 48]] (Nov 24-30) ===
+
===Redirects===
-
Thanksgiving in the US, so we might do something related to that. [[Toikey TV]] was last year's T-Day toon, and one of the only substantial toons related to that holiday we haven't featured yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often.  The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:Sure, we could do that, considering that where Thanksgiving toons are concerned, for the past few years, we've done an article on the previous year's Thanksgiving toon (i.e., Fall Float Parade (2005 toon) in 2006 and Let Us Give Tanks (2006 toon) in 2007). Doing it like this would carry on that little tradition (if we're doing a tradition). [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::Making a tradition out of an american tradition... me likey, me likey! Let's go for it! {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
-
:::Toikey TV seems the best chose for this week. Unless there's any other Thanksgiving toon we forgot about. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 12:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::I only greive that we didn't do Canada's Thanksgiving. Oh, well, no objections here, me hungry for some turkey! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 20:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
Example:
-
:::::In response to Sam's post, there probably is that [[colonization]] email, but that's kind of it. (Some Stupid Turkey is very short.) [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::::I believe that [[Toikey TV]] is the most appropriate toon to feature this week and is also the one with the most support. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 22:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
-
:::::Okay, I'm cool with [[Toikey TV]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
</pre>
-
::::::What about [[Happy T]]?
+
-
:::::::[[Happy T]] may not have enough content. And everyone had pretty much agreed on [[Toikey TV]] already. Remember, FA discussion is more for making a suggestion and giving your reason behind it. {{User:Acam30/sig}} 23:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 49]] (Dec 1-7) ===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
Well, fall's just about over, and winter's nearing. Plus Decemberween is nearing. I'm thinking of a winter article. Any suggestions? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 12:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:Well, it's not actually winter until around 21 December, so I think that might be a bit premature at this point. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 12:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah, let's not get have Decemberween before... Decemberween. I think we should do something [[SBCG4AP]] related. Yea or neh? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 20:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, SBCG4AP's last episode will probably be around this time, so we might be able to fit an SBCG4AP related article this week. Probably the [[SBCG4AP Dev Blog]] would be most deserving. But, maybe not. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 20:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Hmm... well, I think it's doable, but certainly not the best. So as to avoid another week 46, I'm just gonna say that it seems to be a little disorganised, looking at the fun facts, so I personally say "no". Another idea would be [[Homestar Ruiner]]. I know it says it needs cleanup, but I can't see where it says why on the talk page. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Well, that's not winter-themed, so I'm thinking of something like, say... the [[winter pool]] email, maybe? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I just saw the note from Heimstern, so instead, we could move the article on [[Don and Harriet Chapman]] down here. I'm against doing the SBCG4AP series until it's complete. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Let's do that, and then when SBCG4AP is complete, maybe we could feature [[SBCG4AP|this article]] as a whole, which would pretty much cover all of the SBCG4AP bases. {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Okay, let's do it!... several weeks from now! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 01:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 50]] (Dec 8-14) ===
+
==Article discussions==
-
So, it's gettin' '''really''' cold out (probably), so why don't we do [[winter pool]]? Perfect for this kind of probable weather. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 14:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I dunno, it's still not actually winter at this point, not until the 21st. This seems a bit more suited to sometime in January to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::We could do that the first week of January. How about we do some [[Old-Timey]] character for this week instead? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::(Heim: Winter doesn't start until December 21??? Sewiously??? {{User:Acam30/sig}} 19:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC))
+
-
::::Yes, winter doesn't start until the 21st. Anyway, I was thinking of an [[Old-Timey]] character, like maybe [[The Sneak]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Let's use something radio related, like [[Radio Sightings]].--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::No, that one does ''not'' have enough information for it to be a worthy article. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::True. [[Radio Sightings]] is only a list. I was thinking about the email [[radio]], but I'm not sure if we should use another email yet.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 02:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Let's save [[radio]] for another time. Anyways, I can dig [[The Sneak]] for this week. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Just to make it known, i don't think any of the sightings pages will ever make good FAs. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::On the topic of winter, [[winter pool]] seemingly took place ''before'' winter came, as there was very little snow, as if winter was a week or so away. But, if we say "no" to it, I'd say that, while I personally think that [[Fluffy Puff Air-Puffed Sugar Delights]] would be a cool Old-Timey FA, The Sneak is fine by me. No futher comments against the flow from me, I promise. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 01:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::Hey, I'm cool with [[The Sneak]]. I can't wait for the opportunity to use radio, though.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 03:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::: Hmm... How about since its 2 weeks before christmas, how about we do the email [[nightlife]]? it's 2 emails before winter pool , anyway...
+
-
:::::::::::::...I find it a little out of the ordinary that you wuold suggest that at this point in the conversation. I'm wondering what other reason you have for your little interjection. (Also.... I thought we agreed on [[The Sneak]]? {{User:Acam30/sig}} 01:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::::Nah, let's save [[nightlife]] for another time.--[[User:NintenEthan|NintenEthan]] 03:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 51]] (Dec 15-21) ===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
Winter '''FINALLY''' hits this week, so I think the time is right for [[winter pool]]. Any takers? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 21:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:We frequently do a Decemberween feature this week (like with Halloween, we've traditionally done two features for D'ween). Mind you, I don't have any ideas about what we could feature that's D'ween-related, so if no one thinks of a good one, I'm cool with the pool. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::Have we featured [[Decemberween In July]] yet? I kinda like that one. (Nice rhyme by the way Heimi.) {{User:Acam30/sig}} 02:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::D-Ween in July is a sort of short article, in addition, i'd think it'd be better suited to some day in july when people are dreaming of winter... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::And in fairness, we have featured a short from "Decemberween In July" around this time some time ago, which was "That Time of Year". Anyway, we could try another toon that was featured then. I'm thinking [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 6]]. How about that one? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I think that's a pretty good idea. We could do [[winter pool]] in January then. (Note to Game dude386, I'm really not trying to ignore your suggestions; it's just that we like to do seasonal FAs sometimes, and this is a good chance. Plus it's not that long until January!) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I also support TGS 6. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 22:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::A little close after featuring [[Whats-her-face]], but on the whole, why not? {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 02:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 52]] (Dec 22-28) ===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
Since we featured Summer Short Shorts previously (coincidentally, about halfway through the year!), I think the Decemberween article we should feature is the follow up to this one: [[Decemberween Short Shorts]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
:I would be in support of that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::I was gonna suggest that one for last week but I wasn't sure if we'd featured it yet. I would be in support of that also. (No mocking tone intended Heimi ol' buddy.) {{User:Acam30/sig}} 15:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::: I suggest a Decemberween themed email, how about [[what I want]] ?  [[User:Sp0ng3b0b|Sp0ng3b0b]] 10:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::what I want has been done already. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 11:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Even if it was available, it would have to be a minor article before the major article, which was exactly how it was done when it ''did'' receive its own article. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
So, [[Decemberween Short Shorts]]? {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 23:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 1]] (Dec 29-Jan 4) ===
+
-
For this week, and the start of the new year, I decided that we should ''finally'' use That Game Dude's suggestion that has been proposed for several weeks but kept getting bumped off: the email [[winter pool]]. Now that all of the major holidays are out of the way, I think we can do that one at last. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I'd be a hypocrite to say no. {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 20:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::After all, what better way to ring in the new year than to sink into a pool full of gelatin? {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::I have to agree with you on that one Heimi. Who wouldn't? Support [[winter pool]]. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 14:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::[[Winter pool]]? Sounds good to me {{User:Tatpoj121/sig}} 21:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 2]] (Jan 5-11) ===
+
-
In the past, about this week, we usually feature something related to either [[20X6]] or [[Trogdor]]. This year, I was thinking of doing both at the same time with the Trogdor-centric toon: [[Happy Trogday]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:I'm up for it! {{User:DrPepper42/sig}} 02:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::With a 20X6 reference to boot! {{User:That_game_dude386/sig}} 02:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
:::I was thinking [[Trogday 08]]. It is the newest Trogdor-related cartoon and there is some historical significance (with the theme of [[The S is for sucks dragon]]) Any takers?{{User:Tatpoj121/sig}} 01:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
+
-
::::Who said it had to be a new toon? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 01:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
+
==General discussion==
==General discussion==
 +
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2013

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death-Defying Decemberween discussion

Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner: 

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example: 

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

Article discussions

Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

General discussion

Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/HRWiki:Featured_Article_Selection"
Personal tools