Talk:Strong Bad Email

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Fixin' your style, Nebulon.)
(abstract items common w/ toons to separate template)
 
(includes 627 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Talk:Strong Bad Email}}
{{Template:Talk:Strong Bad Email}}
{{featuredarticle}}
{{featuredarticle}}
 +
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Strong Bad Email:}}
 +
''Note: ''<tt>###</tt>'' is used to indicate the new email's number.''
 +
*Create an article for the new email. Use the title as listed on the [[HR:sbemails|Strong Bad Email menu]], with the content <tt><nowiki>{{subst:newsbemail|###}}</nowiki></tt>.<!-- If you already know the forum thread number, use <tt><nowiki>{{subst:newsbemail|###|#####}}</nowiki></tt>.-->
 +
**Create the redirects <tt><nowiki>[[</nowiki>sbemail###]]</tt>, <tt><nowiki>[[</nowiki>sbemail ###]]</tt>, and <tt><nowiki>[[</nowiki>Strong Bad Email ###]]</tt> for the new article.
 +
*Update the appropriate templates:
 +
**{{t|sbenav-lookup}}
 +
**{{t|Strong Bad Email}}
 +
**{{t|recenttoons}}
 +
**{{t|whatsnew}}
-
{| style="background:#CFC; border: 1px dashed #090"
+
<!--* [[HRWiki:Subtitles/Data#Strong Bad Emails]]-->
-
|-
+
*Link to the new email on the following list articles:
-
| style="padding:10px" | '''Checklist for new Strong Bad Email:'''
+
**[[All Toons]]
-
*Update main [[Strong Bad Email]] list.
+
**[[Strong Bad Email]] subsection [[Strong Bad Email#Strong Bad Emails|"Strong Bad Emails"]]
-
*On the same page, update the total emails and various fun facts.
+
***Also update the total emails and relevant fun facts.
-
*Update each list in the Strong Bad Email [[Template:StrongBadEmailInfo|navigation template]].
+
**[[Strong Bad Email Menu]]
-
*Point the navigation template at the top of the next-to-last email and [[some kinda robot]] to the current email and vice versa.
+
**[[H*R.com updates {{CURRENTYEAR}}]]
-
*Link the email page to the forum and vice versa, if necessary.
+
 
-
*Redirect <nowiki>[[</nowiki>sbemail***]] to the current email.
+
*Update the relevant articles collected in {{t|StrongBadEmailInfo}}, particularly under the "Emails by" subsection.
 +
<!--*Link the email page to the forum and vice versa, if necessary.-->
 +
{{common toon checklist items|type=email}}
 +
*Check your work using [[Special:Sbemailcheck]].
|}<br/>
|}<br/>
-
__TOC__
+
== Lappier Era ==
-
 
+
-
== An oddment ==
+
-
 
+
-
I was watching SBEmails. Then, I saw the flash file for ther menu. It still has the compy! [[User:Amy Whifflepoof|Amy Whifflepoof]]
+
-
 
+
-
== Chinese ==
+
-
 
+
-
Okay, what's with the Chinese writing? Iv'e never seen that on the wiki... Is it suppost to be there? [[User:Homestramy20|Homestramy20]] 08:57, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Given that they were all added by an anonymous user to this and a couple of other pages all within an hour or so, and they're all links to commercial websites, probably not. {{User:phlip/sig}} 10:04, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
Here's an answer for you: No Chinese allowed!
+
-
 
+
-
Here's an answer for you: No Chinese allowed! [[The 386]]
+
-
 
+
-
== Newest Scroll Rap ==
+
-
 
+
-
Hey, did anyone notice that Strong Bad's head doesn't move while he is saying his latest email rap? Is this worthy to put on the page? {{User:Rainer/sig}} 10:39, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
Hmmm... It is a bit strange. Perhaps under 'remarks'. There are alot of places that do call for it within the rap. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:54, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
==36 1/2?==
+
-
 
+
-
I noticed somebody replaced '? 1/2' to '36 1/2' for the Toons Menu Stu email. How do we know it's 36 and a half? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 04:50, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
==Template==
+
-
I think that the sbemail articles (NOT the toons, articles), should have a template.  Anyone agree? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 02:59, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Do you mean something in addition to [[Template:Strong Bad Email]]?  If so, I don't think that is necessary.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 03:10, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::I mean for Statistics, length, place, ect. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 03:11, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::You're talking about converting the [[Strong_Bad_Email#Additional_Information|additional information section]] into a template and then putting it on all of those pages? ...Why not? Seems like a good idea to me. (Note: I'm not sure where all you were planning on putting the template, but I don't think it should go on the emails themselves, just on this page and the various specialty pages.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:17, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::No, that template won't go on to the emails themselves, just the information pages. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 03:34, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::Well, it sounds useful, especially since there's nothing on those pages tying them together. I think you should go for it, at the very least so we can see it and make an informed decision. The worst that could happen would be that nobody likes it and it gets reverted, but the way you describe it, I think everyone will like it fine. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:32, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::It looks like E.L. Cool went ahead and made a template, so I added it to the pages. I think the green was intended to match the Tandy, but maybe a different color would be better. What do you think? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:08, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::::Haha.. I didn't even read this post! I thought that I was on a roll with The Cheat Commandos template and Limozeen one that I just went ahead and made it. And yeah, the green is for the Tendy, but you can switch it if you like. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 18:20, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::I went ahead and added [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:StrongBadEmailInfo&curid=12672&diff=0&oldid=159419 Strong Bad Email Statistics] to the template. After all, it was a featured article at one point and I noticed that the article no longer linked to [[Strong Bad Email]]. {{User:The Paper/sig}} 02:08, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Hi, nice one. Forgot about in. Chack out [[Talk:20X6]] for some debate if this taplate should stay of not. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 03:42, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Spin-offs? ==
+
-
 
+
-
We mention a few spin-off toons and characters in the opening paragraph, but there's so many things on the site that Strong Bad emails created. Should we have a section on this page for stuff on the site that came from Strong Bad emails? {{User:Camalex/sig}} 03:28, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
:That's a prooty good idea. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 11:47, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
::So, um, where should I put it on here? I don't think it's worthy of it's own article, is it? {{User:Camalex/sig}} 20:42, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Do TBC change the names of the users who send emails? ==
+
-
 
+
-
[http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=575567&topic=23877070 Topic on GameFAQS]...
+
-
 
+
-
''From: zztman5 | Posted: 10/3/2005 10:17:42 AM | Message Detail  | #004<br>
+
-
...<br>
+
-
''I sent that email. That exact same email, exact down to text and everything... with the exception of the name. They changed my name on it. What the ****.<br>
+
-
''what the crap/10''
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
''From: Alastor the Stylish | Posted: 10/3/2005 11:31:02 AM | Message Detail  | #005<br>
+
-
''They always change the names on them. I thought everyone knew that <_<''
+
-
 
+
-
Zuh? Is this true? I've never heard this... If so, should it be remarked somewhere?
+
-
 
+
-
:What about [[montage]]? We ''know'' it was sent by a wiki user and TBC didn't change the name. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:47, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:I think it's real easy for someone to claim that on an off-topic forum. What kind of evidence does the original poster have, or for that matter the person who claims that "everyone" knows this? Every indication in commentaries and interviews that I've ever seen is that TBC leave an email exactly as-is, with the exception that they might trim it for length. Certainly most of the names and locations in the various emails are vague enough that TBC wouldn't need to change them, and I believe the [[Legal]] page gives them the right to use the submissions. Besides, where would the joke be if there was no real Dan and Linda, Monkeydude, Someone, or Anonymous Contributor? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:56, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Yes, really. I think at least one of those guys is not being truthful. There's no proof to them, whereas the Brothers Chaps have always indicated that their emails are exactly the same, right down to the name (which, I suspect, may be one reason why they never use mine: coz they can't pronounce the name). There's a lot of proof towards what It's dot com said. Personally, I think it's just someone looking for attention. It's a lot easier to say they used your email and changed the name than it is to actually get your email answered. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
 
+
-
== DVD Redirects ==
+
-
 
+
-
Seen as we already have a numerical redirect to all the Strong Bad Emails, does anyone else think that making capitalised DVD redirects would be a good idea for all emails this is possible with (that is, all emails from [[some kinda robot|Some Kinda Robot]] to [[do over|Do Over]], excluding [[homsar|Homsar]], [[pom pom|Pom Pom]],  [[marzipan|Marzipan]] and possibly [[interview|Interview]]) --{{User:Venusy/Sig}}, 22:38, 17 October 2005 (BST)
+
-
:I think it's already been done for a couple, namely [[Army]] and [[Impression]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
==Actual sbemail program?==
+
-
Would it be difficult to write an sbemail.exe program? I would like the "DELETED!" feature in my default mail client, but I also like the dos based look to it. What would be the best language to write it in? has it been done?
+
-
 
+
-
[[User:Agentjs03|Agentjs03]] 15:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Erm, my guess is the best place to ask/check for that kind of stuff is the [http://fanstuff.hrwiki.org/index.php/Main_Page fan stuff wiki].  I'd suggest browsing through the different categories to see if it's not already been done, if not ask there! Let me know if you find anything.  Good luck! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:26, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Something like [[Wikipedia:Mutt (email client)|Mutt]] perhaps?[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 01:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
== A Possible Poll? ==
+
-
Is there a way someone could make a possible poll to vote on the best email ever, it would be very cool...
+
-
 
+
-
:Sorry, but this is a knowledge base.  We aren't about polling people.  Perhaps you could check out some of the polls in the [http://forum.hrwiki.org forum]?[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 02:09, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
==<nowiki>{{clear}}</nowiki>==
+
-
 
+
-
[[Image:ClearEg1.PNG|thumb|Without]] [[Image:ClearEg2.PNG|thumb|With]] I noticed Dot Com reverted my edit, here's why I put the clear up. On larger browser windows, the picture overlaps the top of the list, looking kinda goofy. Although the clear does make the page somewhat larger. Does anybody else have any opinions about the clear setting? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 13:50, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
:Just out of curiosity, what resolution is this running at? Is it 640x480? Is the resolution shown in your pictures the resolution that you normally run your computer at? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 15:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
::I'm guessing 1280x1024, based on where the text wraps. The overlapping didn't happen for me at that resolution, but then I realised - if you hide the TOC it does. Does the change I just made suit everyone? {{User:Phlip/sig}} 15:52, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
:::Yes, that's very nice now, Phil. Thanks. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
::::Great, thanks. Yeah, I have a big monitor, and I also like keeping text small to reduce scrollage. Sometimes the big resolution creates special problems for me. Thanks for fixing this one though, philip. (Oh, and I hate TOCs, I never display them) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 01:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
+
-
{{clear}}
+
-
 
+
-
== Navigation template ==
+
-
:''Note: This is a continuation of the dicussion originally started [[Template_talk:sbe#Succession box|here]].''
+
-
:'''''This project's final status can be found [[HRWiki:Projects#Navigation_templates|here]].'''''
+
-
So I decided to '''be bold''', but it appears I was a bit ''too'' bold.  Anyway, check out the new navigation template at the top of emails [[some kinda robot|1]] through [[i rule|11]], and comment here. The rationale for this is that it's very handy to be able to flash through a sequential group of items without scrolling down to the bottom of the page every time.  My goal was a consistent navigation that keeps the "next" link in (usually) the same place on each page, to minimize the need to move the mouse.  This would be useful when browsing email by email, perhaps to see what characters and places make an appearance in each, or perhaps just to read each synopsis.  Such a thing would be very useful to me right now, for example, as I am trying to compile a little list of the most "important" emails so my wife can read them in order and get a feeling for overall chronology without reading all 130+ emails.  {{User:Bill/sig}} 17:55, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
: Emails [[some kinda robot]] and [[portrait]] demonstrate the tweaked versions of the template for the first and last emails.  Note that, for example, when email #140 gets released, [[portrait]] will have to be changed from the sbelast template to the sbe template, and the name and number for 140 will have to be added to it. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== comments about the ''presence'' of the template ===
+
-
 
+
-
I'm pretty neutral at this point, maybe a bit on the positive side. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
Actually, I'm leaning further positive, the more I think about it. However, with emails that are disambiguated, would the navigation template remain at the top of the screen, or go one line down? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
: Go one line down.  I don't think we want the '''Strong Bad email #X''' line to come before the disambiguation line. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::The only other thing I can think of about the format, is that going forward is easy to just click click click, but going backwards requires moving the mouse around a bit every email. Can't really think of an easy way to fix it though, unless you put forward on the right side of the screen, back on the left side of the screen, and some form of a main title or number in the middle of the screen. What do you think of that? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::As it is now, the template distracts a bit from the thumbnail image.  My eye is expecting just an image to be there, clean and unobstructed, like we have in about 90-95% of our articles. See a few [[Special:Random|random articles]] to compare.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 18:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::What if the links were small and gray? As said: "It's more functional than aesthetic". {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 18:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::That might help Tom's issue, but I wouldn't like the inconsistent formatting of hyperlinks. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::: ''[edit conflict]'' The proximity to the image bothered me, too, but I accepted it as a compromise.  Another possibility is to put the navigation inline; something like one of these, perhaps:
+
-
::::* '''Strong Bad Email #4''' &mdash; [[butt IQ|&lt;&lt; (#3) butt IQ]] | [[making out|making out (#5) >>]]
+
-
::::* '''Strong Bad Email #4''' &mdash; [[butt IQ|&lt;&lt; butt IQ]] | [[making out|making out >>]]
+
-
::::* '''Strong Bad Email #4''' &mdash; [[butt IQ|&lt;&lt;(#3)]] | [[making out|(#5)>>]]
+
-
::::* '''Strong Bad Email #4''' ([[butt IQ|&lt;&lt;previous]] | [[making out|next>>]])
+
-
::::* '''Strong Bad Email #4''' ([[butt IQ|#3]] | [[making out|#5]])
+
-
:::: But I ''think'' I find that more intrusive than where it is now, above the (optional) image.  Anyway, the fourth or fifth one is probably the best; in this context I'd be looking for a minimal footprint. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::The 4th or 5th options could also take advantage of our [[sbemail3]]-type redirects, and we could then shorten the template to three simple variables.  You could probably also manage a Greasemonkey script similar to [http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1015 this one] to work like that too, if we end up not going with the template at all.  Though if we do go with this template, I think I'd rather have the names than just the numbers.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 21:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::Here's what I would do: [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=232217] I think that it is an appropriate position for the navigationand does not take away from other things on the page. -[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 17:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== comments about the presentation of the template ===
+
-
 
+
-
Perhaps a different color, to make it stand out better? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
: I dunno ... it's more functional than aesthetic.  In fact, I didn't want to draw a lot of attention to it, since this is the top of the page.  Part of the reason I flush-righted it was for the "next-link in the same place" goal, but another part was to remove it from the main text stream of the beginning of the page. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:: While you should never place form over function, I would still argue that they're both important.
+
-
:: Instead of:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right>[[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; (#1) some kinda robot]] | [[butt IQ|butt IQ (#3) >>]]</td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
::How about something a little smaller and self-contained:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;font-size:10px;line-height:100%"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&larr; [1] some kinda robot]] | [[butt IQ|butt IQ [3] &rarr;]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
::&mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::Fixing the width of the box on the right?
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #9'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right>
+
-
<table style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;font-size:8px;line-height:100%">
+
-
<tr><td>[[brianrietta|&larr; [8] brianrietta]] |</td>
+
-
<td width="127px" align="center">[[trevor the vampire|trevor the vampire [10] &rarr;]]</td>
+
-
</tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right>
+
-
<table style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;font-size:8px;line-height:100%">
+
-
<tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&larr; [1] some kinda robot]] |</td>
+
-
<td width="127px" align="center">[[butt IQ|butt IQ [3] &rarr;]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 20:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::: I like where that is going (a lot, actually), with a few comments:
+
-
::::# Don't make the links too small; in my browser (with a medium text size), It's dot com's examples are pushing the limit of readability/aesthetics and Tom's examples have crossed it (the text is pixelpuky and the smallest arrows have turned into lines with a one-pixel "blip" on the top side).  This might be a good reason to use &lt;&lt; and >> instead of arrows.
+
-
::::# I wouldn't recommend fixing the width of the right-most box.  You'll never be able to predict how wide it should be for all browser contexts without making it way too wide, and this really isn't necessary; the goal of "same x,y position" is most important for the "next" link (which will get far more use), and even with the size of the next link being variable, you can aim for sort of an "average middle" on the previous link and still not have to move your mouse very much.  Click through the first 10 emails and you'll see what I mean.  (And furthermore, since disambiguation lines introduce Y-axis variations, the whole "same x,y" goal will never be achieved 100%.)
+
-
::::# Let's replace the pipe symbol (|) with a cell border (although I'm sure my css below needs to be cleaned up!).
+
-
::::# Although I, too, began my templates without using number signs (#), I added them later because otherwise a number in parentheses looks more like a count than a designator, and I wanted consistency with the email # on the left-hand side of the same line.
+
-
::: So all that said, the following works really well for me:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;padding: 5px;font-size:10px;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; [#1] some kinda robot]]</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ [#3] >>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
::: or perhaps
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;padding: 5px;font-size:10px;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; some kinda robot (#1)]]</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ (#3) >>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
::: or even just
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;padding: 5px;font-size:10px;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; some kinda robot]]</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ >>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
::: {{User:Bill/sig}} 21:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::: I like this last version very much. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;padding: 5px;font-size:10px;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:12px">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:12px">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::: I also made one here of the simpler version but with arrows for comparison. I enlarged the arrows just a touch. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 22:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::Bill, out of curiosity, how much different is this version (from what you can see in your browser):
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::::from It's dot com's directly above?
+
-
::::::[[Image:SbeNavLayoutSnapshot.PNG|right|thumb|218px]] Here's a snapshot (at 100%).  I still prefer the angle brackets, unless the arrows can be fixed up with a reasonable chance of looking good in various browsers at various resolutions.  I'm using Firefox, 1280x1024, medium-ish text size, on both a laptop and a desktop, and the arrows look a bit clunky on both.  However, I also realize I'm flirting with hypocrisy here, since the angle brackets look quite unsophisticated and I always advocate using the "real" version of a symbol (such as an em dash [&mdash;] instead of two hyphens [--]).  Do we have escape sequences for solid triangles?  Those might make for a good compromise.  {{User:Bill/sig}} 16:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
Oh, and consider whether we would want to use the same trick for Teen Girl Squad, Marzipan's Answering Machine, and any other reasonably sequential series of pages.  We might want a separate set of templates for those others, since the page layout is slightly different from a Strong Bad email, but I'd think we'd want the nav boxes to look consistent. {{User:Bill/sig}} 16:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:Could it be done like this:
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#F2F2F2;border:1px solid #CCC;padding: 5px;font-size:10px;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; some kinda robot]]</td><td>'''homsar'''</td><td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ >>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
How's that look? -[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 17:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:I like it! {{User:Bubsty/sig}} 17:06, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Ationsong, I like your version the best, but what I like would be a full horizontal screen version of that, with the title in the middle, and then the forward and back buttons on the left and right. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 21:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::Bill, here's how it looks for me:
+
-
[[Image:20050107_SbeNavLayoutSnapshot-tom.png|frame]]
+
-
{{clear}}
+
-
:::Another addition I'd like to get your opinion on is the following:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[HR:sbemail2.html|watch]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::I've been meaing to fix the transparancy of that image, but other than that, what do you think?&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 21:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::: Honestly?  I didn't know what it was for at first.  Initially I thought "watch" meant "add it to my watch list."  I guess I'm fairly focused on what I thought the navigation should do, and this seems like an "add-on" that doesn't need to be there.  This nav system is all about rapid movement from one email to an adjacent email; dropping out to watch one of them doesn't need to be part of the "quickness" factor (for that I can easily hit the End key and click the normal watch link). {{User:Bill/sig}} 14:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Easily fixed by the suggestion below:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[HR:sbemail2.html|watch '''homsar''']]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
::::::Better?&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 17:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::Note: [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=MediaWiki%3AMonobook.css&diff=232472&oldid=229416 Fixed transparancy].&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 22:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::How about "watch email" or somesuch that indicates what you're about to watch? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::I think either "watch homsar" or "watch email" would work.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 03:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::::Even though people like my other idea, I had another one, and figured that there's no harm in posting it. It looks like this:
+
-
 
+
-
<br style="clear:both" />
+
-
{| id="navbox" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em; padding: 0.2em"
+
-
! style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" | [[Strong Bad Email]]s
+
-
|-
+
-
| align = "center" valign="top" | [[some kinda robot|&lt;&lt; some kinda robot]] | '''homsar''' | [[butt IQ|butt IQ >>]]
+
-
|-
+
-
| align = "center" valign="top" style="font-size: smaller;" |
+
-
[[some kinda robot]] | '''homsar''' | [[butt IQ]] | [[homestar hair]] | [[making out]] | [[depressio]] | [[halloweener]] | [[brianrietta]] | [[i love you]] | [[trevor the vampire]] | [[i rule]] | [[credit card]] | [[i she be]] | [[duck pond]] | [[the basics]] | [[band names]] | [[studying]] | [[stand-up]] | [[tape-leg]] | [[spring cleaning]] | [[cartoon]] | [[sb_email 22]] | [[little animal]] | [[the bird]] | [[super powers]] | [[CGNU]] | [[3 Wishes]] | [[1 step ahead]] | [[superhero name]] | [[12:00]] | [[sugarbob]] | [[flag day]] | [[gimmicks]] | [[weird dream]] | [[sisters]] | [[guitar]] | [[dullard]] | [[helium]] | [[property of ones]] | [[vacation]] | [[invisibility]] | [[action figure]] | [[little questions]] | [[lures & jigs]] | [[techno]] | [[your friends]] | [[new hands]] | [[ghosts]] | [[theme party]] | [[50 emails]] | [[website]] | [[island]] | [[comic]] | [[morning routine]] | [[cheat talk]] | [[current status]] | [[japanese cartoon]] | [[dragon]] | [[marzipan]] | [[huttah!]] | [[monster truck]] | [[interview]] | [[fingers]] | [[english paper]] | [[unused emails]] | [[the show]] | [[autobiography]] | [[caper]] | [[personal favorites]] | [[big white face]] | [[2 emails]] | [[crazy cartoon]] | [[mascot]] | [[privileges]] | [[funny]] | [[sibbie]] | [[suntan]] | [[anything]] | [[the process]] | [[stunt double]] | [[date]] | [[impression]] | [[labor day]] | [[kids' book]] | [[2 years]] | [[no loafing]] | [[mile]] | [[couch patch]] | [[local news]] | [[colonization]] | [[caffeine]] | [[kind of cool]] | [[army]] | [[video games]] | [[the bet]] | [[lackey]] | [[monument]] | [[stupid stuff]] | [[different town]] | [[flashback]] | [[car]] | [[lunch special]] | [[haircut]] | [[theme park]] | [[replacement]] | [[dangeresque 3]] | [[cheatday]] | [[pom pom]] | [[crying]] | [[for kids]] | [[other days]] | [[old comics]] | [[pizzaz]] | [[the facts]] | [[time capsule]] | [[extra plug]] | [[montage]] | [[virus]] | [[animal]] | [[radio]] | [[part-time job]] | [[dreamail]] | [[origins]] | [[secret recipes]] | [[rock opera]] | [[best thing]] | [[long pants]] | [[rampage]] | [[garage sale]] | [[do over]] | [[boring (really)]] | [[modeling]] | [[bottom 10]] | [[record book]] | [[lady...ing]] | [[geddup noise]] | [[bedtime story]] | [[space program]] | [[portrait]]
+
-
|}
+
-
 
+
-
:::::::This integrates the "email navigation" template with the "strong bad email" template found at the bottom of every page. It still needs a little formatting work, but I think this solves the problem of where to put it so that it does not get in the way of other elements on the page. What does everybody think? -[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 15:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::::A good idea, but the whole point of the nav buttons was to avoid scrolling to the main template. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::::::Science! Er, I mean, "Exactly!" {{User:Bill/sig}} 14:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::::::::And once you get to the big nav template, it's really not that hard to locate your place in the list (since it's a different color and bold) and just click on the next or previous email. (I fixed the template above to illustrate this.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::::::::::Science!, again. {{User:Bill/sig}} 14:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
I am going to implement Tom's most recent design (the one that reads "watch homsar") so that we can see whether we're close or whether we need to go back to the drawing board. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Okay, I switched them on [[homsar]] and [[butt IQ]]. How do they look? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:: It's just not clicking for me, for several reasons:
+
-
::# Too disparate; what does watching the toon have to do with previous/next navigation?
+
-
::# Too redundant; the watch/view links at the bottom of the page are only and End-button away, and offer more options.  (The prev/next links are at the top to reduce scrolling, but this is a non-issue for a low-repetetivity action like watching a toon.)
+
-
::# Too inconsistent; it makes me feel like we would need a little "watch" box at the top of ''every'' page that represents a toon.  (Why would there be a watch box for [[butt IQ]] but not for [[Experimental Film]]?)
+
-
::# Too imposing; the box is starting to take over the top of the page.  Look how big it would get on [[different town]]:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #99'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[stupid stuff|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> stupid stuff]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[HR:different town|watch '''different town''']]</td>
+
-
<td>[[flashback|flashback <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:: So, I advocate keeping this template slim, unimposing, and focused on its task.
+
-
:: {{User:Bill/sig}} 20:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, maybe we ''should'' have a small watch button at the top of all toons. That's often the reason I go to the pages. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Like Bill said, I too think the "watch" button is distracting where it is.  But it is definitely a nice addition to have.  How about [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&diff=234326&oldid=234323 this] format which separates the two yet keeps the watch button handy? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 04:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::Here is a sample:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;">([[HR:sbemail3.html|watch '''{{PAGENAME}}''']])</span></td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::Please ignore the "{{PAGENAME}}" misnomer. I kept the <code><nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki></code> tag for simplicity. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 04:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::: It's a good attempt, but it still seems cluttery to me.  And keep in mind that most pages (other than sb emails) have a different layout at the top of the page.  Where would we put such a link on a regular toon or an answering machine page?  If the benefit was significant, it would be worth working on the layout problem or accepting the clutter for the sake of functionality.  But the benefit is quite minimal; if you're on this page to watch the toon, you can just press the End key and then click the "watch" link at the bottom of the page.  Since most toons last at least two or three minutes, the extra time needed to hit End (or Page Down a few times) is negligible. {{User:Bill/sig}} 14:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::: <s>Also keep in mind that if the PAGENAME template is used, email #100 will have to be hardcoded or will have to have its own special template.  (That's one of the reasons I've not used that template in my examples).</s> &mdash; [[User:Bill|Some Dumb Guy Who ... Comes Around, And ...]] 14:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::: Uh, please ignore those stupid-type words I wrote up there.  I guess I was thinking of the unusual filenaming on the HR site itself; the wiki pages, of course, are no problem.  So, let me take back those stupid-type words and just say "Science, again!". {{User:Bill/sig}} 15:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::<span id="stuxmgs1"></span>Science! Lol! I love that skit. I think it's great evidence that Homestar is really an [[Wikipedia:Autistic savant|Idiot Savant]] of sorts. Case in point: "Strong Bad what are you ''doing''?  You mean doing?" ... "well they're spelled the same!"... Anyway, I digress.  My example was meant ''exclusively'' for use with Strong bad emails and not for the generic toon template.  However, you do make a good point about it being too cluttery and thought of this:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;">([[HR:sbemail3.html|watch]])</span></td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::or this:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;"><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[HR:sbemail3.html|watch]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></span></td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::It's much more concise. Whaddya think!? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::: Oh cwap &mdash; I just realized that my original comment about making an exception for email #100 was right, and my subsequent retraction was actually the stupid-type words.  Anyway ... I still need an answer to the question, "so where do you put that link on every toon that isn't a Strong Bad email?". {{User:Bill/sig}} 15:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Don't worry about the email 100 exception: that's what exceptions are for: we can either <code>subst:</code> the template and hard code the necessary elements, or just substitute the number for "ahundred" since templates don't really care if you're putting in numbers or text. As for toons that are aren't SBEmails, please refer to my [[Talk:Strong Bad Email#stuxmsg2|comment below]] (<s>link to come</s>) regarding the need for two separate templates: one for emails and one for the rest. If you like either of the current versions above (With parens or brackets) we should start applying them soon (after some sort of consensus of course), since having different and inconsistent test versions just sitting pretty. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::BTW, the template above assumes dot com's format which is more concise as it requires less parameters. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
==== further discussion ====
+
-
 
+
-
::::::: Well ... I still don't see a need for the redundant "watch" link, still don't care for the extra clutter, and still want to know what this will look like on a non-email toon before I can buy into it for the emails.  I agree we need to pick a format and move ahead because right now we have at least three different navs on the emails (counting "no nav" as one of the three), so let's pick one without the watch link (for now) and make all the emails consistent.  Then we can easily add the watch link to the template, if everyone likes it, after we figure out where it goes on a non-email toon.  I can live with the version with the arrows, if that's the consensus. {{User:Bill/sig}} 15:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
Could we do it like {{prevnext|some kinda robot|previous email|butt IQ|next email}}<br/>
+
-
<br?>
+
-
or just {{prevnext|some kinda robot|prev|butt IQ|next}}<br/>
+
-
-[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 23:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
: Why?  We have to feed the name of each email to the template anyway (so it can generate the link), so why not display it for the user as well?  I think it's helpful. {{User:Bill/sig}} 15:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Ever since this discussion began, I have paid attention to when I would use this template, and I just wanted to point out that ''several'' times recently I have wished for a "watch" button at the top and have been frustrated to have to scroll all the way to the bottom for it. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::I'm sure that's true ... but I'm also sure the same could be said about other kinds of things we could add to the top of the page.  Any one feature, considered in isolation, would be handy.  The question I have is, what features are most useful overall when we consider the opportunity cost of adding them, and what functionality is really gained for that price (for instance, when you say "scroll all the way to the bottom", I hear "press the End key", so (to me, anyway) it seems like the cost outweighs the benefit).  For example, I am keeping my own local archive of the Flash files, so I would find it very handy to have the "view the flash file" link at the top of each page.  However, considered relative to all the other things that could go at the top, and keeping in mind the clutter burden, I don't think that would be an improvement for the average wiki visitor.  And, if we are going to add watch links to the top of every toon article, where do they go and what do they look like?  I'm not adamantly opposed to them, but I ''am'' still waiting for somebody to answer these questions! {{User:Bill/sig}} 16:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::'''Edit conflict''' Well, given that I really don't want to be writing this paper I kind of volunteered to write... I went ahead and picked one template {{tl|sbenav}} and applied it to the first 12 emails. I also did two other things: i applied that same template to the first email so it would wrap around.  I also moved any disambugation templates below the nav template so that navigation would be "seamless". At least going forward.  I removed the big watch link (i really didn't like it there) but did not add the smaller watch link I proposed above simply because it can be changed later (of course all pages that have the template will need to be refreshed).  I agree with Dot com, I think having a link to watch the toon would be most helpful for those of us who like a little convenience. :)--[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::<blockquote>I'm not adamantly opposed to them, but I ''am'' still waiting for somebody to answer these questions!</blockquote> Like I mentioned before, I am focusing on one thing at a time. First let's take care of the strong bad emails for they have one format, and then worry about the other toons as they have another format (in this case there's no '''Strong Bad Email #XXX''' to piggyback links to watch toons.  If we choose to have watch links by the SBEmails i'm sure that we can find a way to link them to regular toons. I see your point about us potentially including too much clutter, and yes we'll need to draw the line and I think it can be drawn right next to the watch button. I was thinking even that we could use a techinque I've seen been used in signatures:
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #1 <small>([http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail1.html w])</small>'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[death metal|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> death metal]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homsar|homsar <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
It's smaller and a little less intrusive.
+
-
--[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::Actually, since my screen here is 800x600, and the sbemail template is so large, I have to hit "end" and then "page up" 1 or 2 times to reach it.  so that's a whopping 2 or 3 extra keystrokes to get to it! =) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::And couldn't you press End to get to the big navigation template, too? Now that I think about it, why would you need to advance through the sbemails so quickly that a link would be necessary at the ''top'' of the page? If someone is searching for something, it would seem to me that there are more efficient ways of doing that. On the other hand, I think a "watch" button would be at least as useful or more useful than navigation buttons. As for where they would go, we have a sample that combines the two ideas, and a similar template could be made for toons that would need a "watch" button only. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 16:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::I thought the nav template was proposed for navigation convenience?  To browse through the emails one by one and just kinda look at stuff? I thought the purpose of this template [[Talk:Strong_Bad_Email#Navigation_template|was]] [[Talk:Strong_Bad_Email#comments_about_the_presence_of_the_template|settled]] in dicussions above?  I do agree though that the watch button is as useful if not more than the nav template. Q: Dot com, what did you mean by "we have a sample that combines the two ideas?" Speaking of discusion, I added a [[Talk:Strong_Bad_Email#further_dicussion|tag]] further down for ease in commenting. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::I thought it was settled, too.  Anyway, if we're okay with the level of terseness used in sigs, here's another (minimalist) idea that combines the nav and the watch link:
+
-
 
+
-
'''Strong Bad Email #1 &nbsp; [[death metal|&larr;]] <small>[http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail1.html &nbsp;]</small>[[homsar|&rarr;]]'''
+
-
 
+
-
:::::You'll notice I had to cheat to make the text portion of the HR link disappear, and the cheat is apparent when you mouse over it.  I assume that could be fixed.  {{User:Bill/sig}} 17:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr>
+
-
<td>[[HR:sbemail2.html|watch '''homsar''']]</td>
+
-
<td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
:::::''(Edit conflict)'' Stux: A template like the one above. Note that I switched the position of the "watch" and "prev" buttons. Does that help it any? The reason I questioned putting it at the top is that if you're going to be looking at the toon article in any depth, then you're going to be scrolling ''down'' away from the navigation template, and so it wouldn't be on screen when you needed it, and therefore you'd have to scroll to it no matter where it was, ''unless'' you were advancing through several sbemails in a row, which just didn't seem as likely to me. (And I know that that was a proposed use for the template, because way up there is discussion of relative X and Y values between different pages.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::There's a lot of useful information at the very top: a summary synopsis, the cast of characters, a list places, and usually a screenshot of a defining moment.  It may not seem likely to you that somebody would want to quickly click through the emails, but it seems likely to me because I ''do'' it.  One of the central ideas underlying the web is that not everyone wants the same thing, or wants to do it in the same way, so we provide different tools for differnt users.  Some want to browse.  Some want to search.  Some want to follow a trail of hyperlinks.  Some want to use a master menu as a base of operations.  And some &mdash; or at least this one &mdash; want to click through sequentially.  If I'm the only one who does, then by all means let's scrap the idea and go back to a cleaner page layout.  Or add your extra watch links.  I'm going to take a rest from the discussion now; it's already become too much work for the benefit and I don't have the energy to fight charges of uselessness when I thought the value of the navigation had already been established.  I recommend removing the navigation from all the live pages and transplanting this discussion to someplace more central (since it has grown larger than just sbemails).  If anyone else still thinks the previous/next navigation has value, then you can hash out the details and put it back in.  But if it turns out I'm the only one, then I would have to concede that the usefulness is too narrow to make it part of the site.  {{User:Bill/sig}} 17:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::I'm not trying to have the whole idea scrapped. I merely was noticing that the recent examples were missing the "watch" link and was trying to get that put back in, reasoning that such a link was at least as important as the nav links. Obviously we two put different weight on the respective links. But I have no problem with having ''both'' if we're gonna have any. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::Actually, all of the versions I posed had a watch button to them.  I just didn't include them in the {{tl|sbenav}} template due to the discussion at the time.  The above revision is definitely better. I probably should include a list of what I consider to be current "candidates" (starting with the current version):
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding = 0>
+
-
<td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''0'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''1'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[HR:sbemail2.html|watch '''homsar''']]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''2'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;">([[HR:sbemail3.html|watch '''{{PAGENAME}}''']])</span></td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''3'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;">([[HR:sbemail3.html|watch]])</span></td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''4'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #3''' <span style="padding:5px;font-size:x-small;"><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[HR:sbemail3.html|watch]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></span></td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[homsar|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> homsar]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homestar hair|homestar hair <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''5'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #1 <small>([http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail1.html w])</small>'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr><td>[[death metal|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> death metal]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[homsar|homsar <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''6'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
'''Strong Bad Email #1 &nbsp; [[death metal|&larr;]] <small>[http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail1.html &nbsp;]</small>[[homsar|&rarr;]]'''
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor=#BFBFBF>'''7'''</td></tr><tr><td>
+
-
 
+
-
<table width=100% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2><tr>
+
-
<td>'''Strong Bad Email #2'''</td>
+
-
<td align=right><table border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="background:#f2f2f2;border:1px solid #ccc;padding: 5px;font-size:x-small;line-height:100%;border-collapse: collapse;"><tr>
+
-
<td>[[HR:sbemail2.html|watch '''homsar''']]</td>
+
-
<td>[[some kinda robot|<span style="font-size:small">&larr;</span> some kinda robot]]</td>
+
-
<td>[[butt IQ|butt IQ <span style="font-size:small">&rarr;</span>]]</td></tr></table></td>
+
-
</tr></table>
+
-
 
+
-
</td></tr>
+
-
</table>
+
-
 
+
-
--[[User:Stux|Stux]] 21:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== new thought ===
+
-
 
+
-
If I could wish any wish this holiday season, first would be the crap about the kids*, but second would be this:  The ability to define an article as part of a named series.  All such articles would be numbered to define the sequence within the series, and when displayed, would automatically get "previous" and "next" links in the toolbox, or above or to the right of the title, or someplace like that.  Being a software developer, maybe I should look into what it would take to write a wiki extension that does something along these lines. {{User:Bill/sig}} 18:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
{{sitelanguagenotice}}
+
-
:<nowiki>*</nowiki> Adapted from "A Holiday Wish" [http://jdmbablog.blogspot.com/2004/12/holiday-wish-by-steve-martin.html] by Steve Martin on ''Saturday Night Live''.
+
-
::I think that sketch is hilarious and wish I could see it again. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== genericity of the navigation ===
+
-
 
+
-
Some more examples to chew upon:
+
-
 
+
-
<div style="color:black; background:none; font-weight:normal; margin:0; padding-bottom: .17em; border-bottom:1px solid #aaa; font-size:188%; margin-bottom: .5em;"
+
-
class="firstHeading">Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 2.0</div>
+
-
 
+
-
{{prevnext|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 1.0|Version 1.0|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 3.0|Version 3.0}}
+
-
 
+
-
The King of Town unsuccessfully tries to deliver an invitation, Pom Pom talks crazy talk, and Detective Everybody reports that Homestar Runner is dead.
+
-
 
+
-
[[Image:MarzipanAnsweringMachineV2.png|thumb|180px|right|Good for screening calls]]
+
-
'''Cast (in order of appearance):''' [[Marzipan]], [[Strong Bad]], [[The King of Town]], [[Pom Pom]], [[Homestar Runner]]
+
-
 
+
-
. . .
+
-
<br clear=all>
+
-
<div style="color:black; background:none; font-weight:normal; margin:0; padding-bottom: .17em; border-bottom:1px solid #aaa; font-size:188%; margin-bottom: .5em;"
+
-
class="firstHeading">Teen Girl Squad Issue 8</div>
+
-
 
+
-
{{prevnext|Teen Girl Squad Issue 7|Issue 7|Teen Girl Squad Issue 9|Issue 9}}
+
-
 
+
-
The girls join the Battle of the Bands.
+
-
 
+
-
[[Image:Kissy Boots.PNG|200px|thumb|Kissy Boots in action.]]
+
-
'''Cast (in order of appearance):''' [[Cheerleader]], [[So and So]], [[What's Her Face]], [[The Ugly One]], [[Minor Teen Girl Squad Characters#Intercom|Intercom]], [[Tompkins]], [[Mrs. So-and-so-erson]], [[Minor Teen Girl Squad Characters#Floor Tom|Floor Tom]], [[Pom Pom]], [[Minor Teen Girl Squad Characters#Fatty|Fatty]], [[Minor Teen Girl Squad Characters#Trolls|Trolls]], [[Minor Teen Girl Squad Characters#A Shark|A Shark]], [[Strong Bad]] (Easter egg)
+
-
 
+
-
. . .
+
-
<br clear=all>
+
-
There may be some other series that could benefit from this, too; these just seemed like the most obvious. {{User:Bill/sig}} 15:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
I've set up new templates that work as follows:
+
-
 
+
-
: <nowiki> {{ prevnext | prev-actual-name | prev-show-as | next-actual-name | next-show-as }} </nowiki>
+
-
 
+
-
: <nowiki> {{ pn | prev-actual-name | next-actual-name }} </nowiki>
+
-
 
+
-
Both are designed to work right before a line or paragraph of text, and will place the navigation box flush right with the text flowing around it.
+
-
 
+
-
==== examples ====
+
-
 
+
-
{{prevnext|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 1.0|Version 1.0|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 3.0|Version 3.0}}
+
-
The King of Town unsuccessfully tries to deliver an invitation, Pom Pom talks crazy talk, and Detective Everybody reports that Homestar Runner is dead.
+
-
 
+
-
: <small>Uses ''<nowiki> {{prevnext|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 1.0|Version 1.0|Marzipan's Answering Machine Version 3.0|Version 3.0}} </nowiki>''</small>
+
-
 
+
-
{{prevnext|Teen Girl Squad Issue 7|Issue 7|Teen Girl Squad Issue 9|Issue 9}}
+
-
The girls join the Battle of the Bands.
+
-
 
+
-
: <small>Uses ''<nowiki> {{prevnext|Teen Girl Squad Issue 7|Issue 7|Teen Girl Squad Issue 9|Issue 9}} </nowiki>''</small>
+
-
 
+
-
{{pn|some kinda robot|butt IQ}}
+
-
'''Strong Bad Email #2'''
+
-
 
+
-
: <small>Uses ''<nowiki> {{pn|some kinda robot|butt IQ}} </nowiki>''</small>
+
-
 
+
-
{{prevnext|some kinda robot|#1|butt IQ|#3}}
+
-
'''Strong Bad Email #2'''
+
-
 
+
-
: <small>Uses ''<nowiki> {{prevnext|some kinda robot|#1|butt IQ|#3}} </nowiki>''</small>
+
-
 
+
-
{{pn|highschool|homsar}}
+
-
I've also been thinking that instead of having special templates for the first and last item in the series, we should just use a single template for everything and let each series "wrap around" at the endpoints.  For example, this paragraph contains the proposed navigation for email #1. This means a little more work (for instance, when the next new Strong Bad email is released, we will have one extra step to update [[some kinda robot]] to change its "prev" link from [[highschool]] to the new email), but it should make the template system a lot easier to maintain, as well as giving the users a bit more functionality.
+
-
 
+
-
{{User:Bill/sig}} 15:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:<span id="stuxmsg2"></span>I like the wrap-around idea! However, I do think it's probably best to have two separate templates: one for the sbemails (since they have a special format which includes the "Strong bad email #X" title (and can include the ''watch'' versions proposed in the [[Talk:Strong Bad Email#stuxmgs1|discussion above]],) and one for everything else. And yeah it's no big deal to update the prev/next on wrap arounds: (on the old current email, the first, and the new last email). It's just like adding a new element to a wrap-around doubly linked list! ;) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
==== what's next? ====
+
-
::I'll have to think of a way to add the watch link to [[Talk:Strong Bad Email#stuxmgs1|general toons]]. Right now I'm focusing on the emails. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::Strong Bad Emails completed, sirs. What's next? &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 23:14, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::Awesome! As discussed above, we were looking into expanding this feature for use in general toons. Dunno if this should continue in a different page or not. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 01:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::An aside: I just thought [[Talk:Strong_Bad_Email/Archive#next_and_previous_E-mail|this dicussion]] I found, was interesting given this current thread. Oh, and I like alliteration. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Are we happy with the watch button the side, or did we like it in the middle? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 16:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::At least in my opinion, definitely the side.  It was too distracting in the middle. Or something. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:'''''This project's final status can be found [[HRWiki:Projects#Navigation_templates|here]].'''''
+
-
 
+
-
== new menu ==
+
-
 
+
-
When the new rap came out, the email [[geddup noise]] is new again, and the emails newer than that aren't there.
+
-
--{{User:Nckinfn04/sig}} 20:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
: Even odder: I'm trying to load it, and NO emails are listed, and the "random.bat" button leads to [[HR:undefined|this]] (404'd) page (that is, "undefined", without even so much as a ".html".) [[highschool]] works fine though... when linked from the [[Main Pages]] or externally. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::Most works for me... The only glitchy thing is random.bat. It works fine; it just doesn't scroll. I mean, you click it and the screen stays in place, instead of following the cursor. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
::I get Jay's error.  Very strange {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}}
+
-
:::Me too. When I pressed random, it went to undefined but when I pressed it again, it caused my computer to run very slowly. Odd. - <sub>[[User_talk:Sahm|<font color=blue><i>talk</i></font>]]</sub> <b>[[User:Sahm|<font color=teal>Sahm</font>]]</b> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Sahm|<font color=turquoise><i>ribs</i></font>]]</sup>
+
-
::::I'm having similar problems.  Yesterday I couldn't see ''any'' emails listed (and I got a warning dialog saying that Flash was running slowly and was making my computer slow); today the newest one is geddup noise. {{User:Bill/sig}} 16:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::For me the entire site has been running '''''very sloooooolyyy''''' (I just checked and the site is back up to 100% speed! I wonder if they were getting a DOS attack or just every desparate H*R fan was hitting the site all at once!).  This would explain your problems: the flash files are unable to load the new versions of the .xml files and therefore will either present an error or load an older, cached version. (I too was getting emails up to geddup noise and thought that might be the problem.  I didn't use rando though). --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::Yeah, the menu is working just fine now (and doesn't seem to be [[Moving Very Slowly]]... very, very slowly... any more.) If it was loading older .xml files from cache, that might explain why I was getting nothing - I keep my cache as small as possible at all times (hit to loading times, but I have a fast enough connection that it's not that bad, and it helps pages refresh faster.) --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Fixed it. Just clear your cache. [[Special:Preferences|How?]]
+
-
I cleared the cache but it still doesn't scroll. {{User:Salty/sig}} 02:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== roulette ==
+
-
 
+
-
On the menu, the roulette dosen't move around, and it doesn't pick a random email. --{{User:Nckinfn04/sig}} 21:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:See the conversation directly above this one. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
::Of which you were a part of... {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 02:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== External links template ==
+
-
 
+
-
I can never remember the verbiage for the external links, and it occurred to me: why don't we have a template for it? So I made one and applied it to the most recent email:
+
-
 
+
-
<code><nowiki>{{sbemailextlinks|142|6836}}</nowiki></code> produces this:<br/>
+
-
*[[HR:sbemail142.html|watch "secret identity"]]
+
-
*[[HR:sbemail142.swf|view the Flash file for "secret identity"]]
+
-
*[[Forum:6836|forum thread re: "secret identity"]]
+
-
 
+
-
There are a few special cases where the Flash file is different from the HTML file, and the early emails don't have forum threads, so we could also make sbemailextlinks2 and -3 if we wanted. I don't know that it's necessary to convert all the old ones, but it should be helpful on the new ones. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:Is it worth it to make it more complicated?  I've thought about it before for the info at the top of emails too, but then always talked myself out of it because it seems like it would confuse some for only a small gain (at least for the stuff at the top, this is a better scenario).  We could make lots of things easier by using complicated templates, but then the learning curve would increase.  I like the idea though, and if others like it too, I wouldn't be against using it.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 03:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
::Well, it saves having to type the name of the toon three times, and I can never remember the wording without looking it up. At the very least, it could be a tool that could be subst'd on each new email. Maybe it could be tweaked (or a "toon" version created) to handle all toons. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
:::At the '''''*very*''''' least it can be used as a <code>subst:</code> template. If you know about it, you use it, if not you don't. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 04:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== All emails? ==
+
-
 
+
-
Does [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Strong_Bad_Email&diff=247500&oldid=247175 this] number take into account DVD emails or no?  I think that information should be explicit. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:I think so, I don't see why they wouldn't count those. {{User:Salty/sig}} 04:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Floppy Disk Container ==
+
-
 
+
-
:''This discussion was originally on [[Talk:secret identity]].''
+
-
 
+
-
I don't remember now where i got the comment from, but the original Sam & Max comment had been removed because it's in the [[Floppy Disk]] page now.  I made the [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=secret_identity&diff=248700&oldid=248699 new one] more concise and pointed to the floppy disk page.  So what is the precedent for it?  Do we simply not mention anything about the floppy disk and simply assume readers know about the floppy disk page (and know where it's at) and will go there to find out what the floppy disk says? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:I have often wonder why that page is never mentioned on the email page but far as I know, we don't mention the floppy disks on th email page. {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 16:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah...it seems like the page should be linked ''somewhere'' on the email page.  If it was linked, where would that go?  In the remarks section?  Or could the link be put in a common location on each email page which features a floppy disk? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::''[noting edit conflict due to similarity of ideas]'' You know, this should be fixed. [[Floppy Disk Container]] isn't, as far as I can tell, linked to from anywhere relevant, not even the main [[Strong Bad Email]] navigation template. The best it has going for it is that it's in [[:Category:Strong Bad Email]]. Why not have a one-line mention somewhere in each email that points out what the disk title is and gives a link to FDC? I'm thinking either something in the trivia or up in the stats at the top of the page. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::I'd go with Remarks/Trivia on each email that features it. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 17:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::I like the idea of the stats position at the top of each page.  For example this week's would have the following:
+
-
::::'''Floppy Disk:''' [[Floppy Disk Container|sam and max]]
+
-
:::right below '''Page Title'''. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::Regarding the link to FDC: We should have a standard. How about this: <nowiki>[[Floppy Disk Container#<game name>|<game name>]] where <game name> is the name of the game written exactly as it is on the disk label. Then, we should insert corresponding IDs into the rows of the table over at FDC, like this: id="<game name>"</nowiki>. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::That makes sense...so that the link goes to the relevant floppy. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Until we decide where on the email page to link, I'm going to just start adding the id's to the FDC page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::Perhaps something like...
+
-
* The [[Floppy Disk Container]] reads ''sam and max''.
+
-
::::And maybe the italized part will... link to the actual section of the Floppy Disc Container page... I don't think it needs a place up at the top, because not all emails have them. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 17:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::I give up...I thought I could figure out how to add those invisible ID's, but I need help.  Is it literally the text, id="sam and max", for example, or am I missing brackets, etc.?  Thanks, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Shouldn't we just go with subheaders within the table, as we do with almost every other table-based page? - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 18:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::It looks a little redundant to have the two bold headings though...if we add those subheaders, should we unbold the second occurrence? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::Probably. I noticed this, too. - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 18:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::What about an invisible tag?  To my eye, the current bold text is sufficient as a header... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::How do you make those? - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 18:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::Personally, I think the standard headers add too much space to each entry.  Dot com's done the id thing before but I don't remember what page he's used it at (probably one of the obscure list page thingys somewhere). I'll check and see if i've linked to it at any point. Or if it's in the help pages. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::It would've been [[User talk:It's dot com/The System Is Down|here]] if someone had asked already but it's not. I recommend you post an inquiry in his talk page. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 18:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::What, you don't think I would be following this thread? :) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::Are you kidding? I was ''counting'' on you to answer the question like [[Talk:secret_identity#Past_our_bedtimes|three minutes]] after Trey56 has posed it! ;) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 19:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::I should be more patient (sorry).  By the way, the current tags all link to the top of the table (see [[HRWiki:Sandbox#Test]]), but I'm going to leave this project to somebody who actually knows what s/he's doing. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 19:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::::::::::::::You seem to be on the right track. Don't give up. :) By the way, the other pages with IDs are [[Quote of the Week|QotW]] and [[Weekly Fanstuff]]. Also, the underscores may be important (I'm not sure) and there are special characters to watch out for (like question marks, etc.), just so you know. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::::::::::::::If you need/want help with some of the grunt work, gimme something to do.  I am looking for a project. {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 21:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:Sorry, too many colons.  So far, I've added all the tags to [[Floppy Disk Container]], and as soon as we decide where we want the links on the email pages, those need to be added. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::I changed the wording in the Trivia section a little. For one, the label on the disk has the writing on it, not the disk container itself. Also, I changed it from italics to quotes. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
So, the two main options for adding the links to [[Floppy Disk Container]] on the relevant emails follow (please add comments/preferences):
+
-
----
+
-
<div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 132%;"> Top-of-page statistics </div>
+
-
In this case, the title for [[secret identity]] would look like this:
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Strong Bad Email #142'''
+
-
 
+
-
:Chris from Laramie, Wyoming, asks Strong Bad if he has any secret identities. Strong Bad discusses several options.
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Cast (in order of appearance):''' [[Strong Bad]] , [[The Poopsmith]] , [[Homestar Runner]], [[The King of Town]], [[Bubs]], [[Marzipan]], [[Strong Sad]] (Easter egg)
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Places:''' [[Computer Room]], [[Bubs' Concession Stand|Bubs' Motor Lodge]], [[Trailer Home]], [[Smoky Office]], [[Marzipan's House]]
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Computer:''' [[Lappy 486]]
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Date:''' January 25, 2006
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Running Time:''' 3:42
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Page Title:''' Lappy 486
+
-
 
+
-
:'''Floppy Disk:''' [[Floppy Disk Container#sam_and_max|sam and max]]
+
-
----
+
-
<div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 132%;"> Trivia section </div>
+
-
In this case, the Trivia section of [[secret identity]] would have the following fact:
+
-
:* The label on the disk in the floppy disk container reads "[[Floppy Disk Container#sam_and_max|sam and max]]".
+
-
----
+
-
=== Top-of-page statistics ===
+
-
#<s>I second {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 22:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)</s>
+
-
#I third. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 22:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#I fourth. &mdash; {{User:Lapper/sig}} 00:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== Trivia section ===
+
-
#I like this one better. The Floppy Disk Container is more of a "remark" or "real-world reference" than a vital statistic, and a casual reader might not know what '''Floppy Disk: *a game*''' means. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 22:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#I agree with Homestar Coder. It flows better in a fun fact-type location. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
#It's an inside joke. All other inside jokes go in the fun facts, so why should this one be different? - {{User:Joshua/sig}} 23:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#Y'all are convincing. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#I second that notion. <!--No idea why I said this, it just sounded prooty cool.-->{{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 00:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#{{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
# Sounds convincing, so, for now, I'll abstain by voting twice. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 00:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
#{{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 13:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC) ''Good arguments, switching my vote''
+
-
#{{User:E.L. Cool/sig}}
+
-
{{clear}}
+
-
 
+
-
=== Consensus ===
+
-
It looks like the trivia section won out. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:Update: they're done. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
=== Where does the period go? ===
+
-
This will probably seem ridiculous to most everybody reading it, but I want to make all the pages consistent.  I'm not an English major, so could somebody tell me which of the following is the correct location of the period?
+
-
# The label on the disk in the floppy disk container reads "[[Floppy Disk Container#sam_and_max|sam and max]]."
+
-
# The label on the disk in the floppy disk container reads "[[Floppy Disk Container#sam_and_max|sam and max]]".
+
-
Just wanted to get it right before I made all the changes.  Thanks, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:The second one. That way there's no confusion as to whether Strong Bad included the period or not. (Of course, if there is ever one with a dot at the end, it would go inside the quotation marks.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::Thanks for the help (and sorry to whoever ends up having to patrol all those changes) {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
 
+
-
== Unreleased Email ==
+
-
When watching [[Sketchbook (video)]], I documented all the writings on paper seen in the video. One of the things appeared to be an unreleased email with The Cheat. Here's what it said:
+
How are we going to handle categorizing the new sbemails? We still have [[sbemail206]] and [[too cool]] under the "[[Compé]] Era" section, even though the latter is unquestionably a [[Lappier]] Era email. The problem, of course, is that the sbemail menu is still Compé-themed. But we shouldn't keep sticking sbemails in a misleadingly-named section until The Brothers Chaps decide to update their menu. Is there a temporary solution we could use until then? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 17:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 +
:I think there should be a "Lappier Era" section, and maybe a note pointing out that it still uses the Compé menu. It makes more sense than including Lappier emails in the Compé section. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
-
''at 3:12''
+
== Not Quite Strong Bad Email List ==
-
and then as a special treat<br/>
+
A little while ago, I {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Strong_Bad_Email&diff=783935&oldid=783934 changed the list}} to use &mdash; em dashes instead of <small>(tiny text in parentheses)</small>. Not only does it look much better (in my opinion), but it's also more consistent with other lists on the wiki. However, it was reverted because it didn't have as much of a "feel" to it. But I don't think that's necessarily a good thing. How should this list be formatted? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
-
I let The Cheat answer<br/>
+
:Anyone else have an opinion? The em dashes look clean and consistent, and the tiny text looks aesthetically displeasing. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
-
some emails<br/>
+
: i dunno, the tiny text looks nice to me, with text being the same size it looks a bit cluttered {{User:Timmodonuts/sig}} 15:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-
<br/>
+
::I'm for the em dash list. The current style doesn't match any other list on the wiki that I'm aware of, and I think changing text size in-line decreases readability. (What does "has a feel to it" mean anyway?) {{User:Lira/sig}} 19:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-
Dear SB,<br/>
+
:::I agree that the full size text seems very cluttered and hard to read.  Perhaps there’s a different way to present the information? -[[Special:Contributions/166.170.0.121|166.170.0.121]] 22:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-
Why so glate?<br/>
+
::::That's weird. For me it's the opposite; the full size text is pleasant and readable, while the small text looks cluttered and arbitrary. Maybe we could make it a table, with one column for the email number, one for the title, and one for the description. That way, we can keep the full size text, with borders between each item so it isn't as cluttered. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:21, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-
-Deb Stein<br/>
+
::::: I am down for tables, I love tables, they make it much easier to digest the information! {{User:Timmodonuts/sig}} 16:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
-
<br/>
+
::::::Not so into the table idea. That just sounds unnecessarily bulky and a weird format for the information. Maybe I just need to see a preview, but I still like the standard list with plain text. {{User:Lira/sig}} 20:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
-
Yeah, man. I'll gnaw your<br/>
+
:::::::I don't understand the desire to table everything. I think a table is best applied in situations when paired with an image or other critical data, such as dates. If it's just an example with an explanation, an ordinary list should suffice. -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131|68.37.43.131]] 03:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
-
face off.<br/>
+
::::::::Yeah, I mostly agree. I only suggested it because it seemed like a good way to include full size text without some people finding it cluttered. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
-
-Teh C. (repeat) <br/>
+
:::::::::The thing is it's no more cluttered than any other list of information on the wiki. If the style is cramping people's style, that should be a larger question for another talk page. Myself, I have no trouble reading it. {{User:Lira/sig}} 16:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
-
<br/>
+
::::::::::Most other places in the wiki don’t have long sentence descriptions within this kind of list. -[[Special:Contributions/166.137.90.18|166.137.90.18]] 18:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
-
Oh man, "I'll gnaw your face<br/>
+
:::::::::::No? What about [[Homestar Runner and Strong Bad's Relationship|character relationships]]? What about [[Style|running gags]] and [[Doughnuts|item pages]]? How is this different? {{User:Lira/sig}} 19:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
-
off!" every year it gets<br/>
+
So far, it seems there are 3 votes for em dashes, 1 votes for parentheses, 1 vote for tables, and 1 vote for an alternative solution. That's probably the closest we'll get to a consensus, so I've made the changes. I'm putting my reasoning here in place of an edit summary:<br>
-
funnier! Happy The Cheat<br/>
+
The wiki's font size is intended to be read comfortably, so this list should stick to that. Like Lira said, if the text looks cluttered, that's a problem with the wiki rather than this list, so the discussion should be moved elsewhere. Every list on the wiki is formatted the same way, and no one has ever complained of their clutteredness before, to my knowledge. This list is no different in content, and that should be reflected in its appearance. Additionally, I think the consistent size looks cleaner and less arbitrary, and the em dash creates a neat separation between title and description. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
-
Day Ilko. <s>Here's hopin you</s><br/>
+
-
May never get the<br/>
+
-
Is there anywhere that we could put this?
+
== {reading} ==
-
:That's part of the script for [[cheatday]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]]
+
-
:: Well, not the "glate" part, but yeah. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
:::Heh Heh...<small>...</small> Didn't know. That. Thanks for setting me straight. :)-[[User:AtionSong|<font face="BankGothic Md BT">AtionSong</font>]] 23:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
== What is wrong with "Crapfully yours" ==
+
Some emails have ''{reading}'' (or some variant) before the email, and some don't. Should we remove them from those emails, or add them to the rest? Or even leave them as is? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:For the discussion purposes, when present [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=dragon&diff=next&oldid=784857 it looks like this].
 +
:Honestly, I'd be in favour of removing such instances. This mostly seems to be present in some older transcripts. I think just the presence of the email template is shorthand for him reading it out loud. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 05:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
::I am on the fence whether or not we should remove such instances.  Although 99% of email entries are read, sometimes they just show up on the screen. Also, "training" the new reader into expecting "hey this block will be read out loud" the first few emails (assuming they somehow went through each email sequentially) wouldn't be a bad thing.  And, in a detailed wiki like this, it might not hurt to have the "reading" portion in every email (although it should look sleeker).  Now, my own comment ago kind of thwarted an idea I had, and that was: add the "Reading" portion to the email templates or block quotes.  However, since this isn't going to be used 100% of the time, it's probably counter productive (instead a template that adds the notice would probably be better -- that is if we keep the notices at all.) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 12:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::Since I haven't given my opinion yet, I don't think the notices are necessary. The email box is kind of a continuation of Strong Bad's dialogue, and in cases where it isn't read aloud, the transcript usually states ''{The following email can be seen:}'' or something similar. Going straight from the email song to the email makes for a smoother transition.
 +
:::We don't necessarily have to edit every email page right away, since that would be a huge undertaking. But it would be nice to reach a consensus, just so the notices can be added or removed during unrelated edits, if that makes sense. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
-
I don't understand, is he just getting mad about it? It doesnt seem like something one would care about, though I have never sent strong bad an e-mail, I would say crapfully yours.-ken
+
== Strong Bad Email Menu ==
-
: He's not getting mad, just exasperated at the extremely old joke. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::See [[Crapfully Yours]] for more information.&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 02:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
+
Two points to make
 +
1. Why did we never have an article for the Strong Bad Email menus in general when the Toon Time and the speciality sbemail ones have a page?
 +
2. The new menu works completely differently and will probably need it's won page or subsection. Still trying figurue out if there's a pattern to Strong Bad's comments on the emails. [[User:Guybrush20X6|Guybrush20X6]] 02:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 +
:Yeah, I was just wondering that myself. We need to create [[Strong Bad Email Menu]], stat! (Also, I notice you've been adding descriptions to each email's page. I'd suggest holding off on that for now. It's a big project that needs consensus for how it's going to be implemented.) {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 +
::Discussion about descriptions continues at [[HRWiki:Projects#Toon Descriptions|HRWiki:Projects → Toon Descriptions]]
-
I personally think that it is awesome, genious, and creative just like trogdor is, but nobody is sayin he's old, although, trogdor is sooo much cooler. If you sit down and think about it, you'll thinks it's hillarious, i mean, crapfully yours, hahahahahaha, say, i am gunna make another section about strong badia in the strong badia section, sooo i'll see you there. But i will still check this out.-ken
+
== anyone like tge sbemaiil homsar? ==
-
== Email list: Column length and <tt>&lt;autocolumn></tt> ==
+
anyone? no? ok...
-
I noticed that not long ago, my editing the lengths of the columns in the email list were reverted, and not long after, I noticed that [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] added an <tt>&lt;autocolumn></tt> tag. I think that's a good idea, but I don't like how the way it's currently implemented deals with the lengths of the columns. Currently, the first two columns are each one item longer than the second two. When email #149 is released, the way <tt>&lt;autocolumn></tt> is set up now, the first column will be one longer than the other ''three''. It seems to me that in any other context, the more usual and more natural method is to have all the columns but the last equal in length, with the last column being shorter. When #149 is released, that would mean the last column would be shorter by three items, but because the others are equal, it looks better than having the first column sort of jutting out at the bottom. (Interestingly, I think I was the first one to convert the list from three columns to four, and it wasn't reverted then.) [[User:Gus|Gus]] 23:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
+
==Sbemail209 release date==
 +
March 25th, 2022 --[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 17:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 +
:I wouldn’t get my hopes up. I don’t think we’re gonna see it for quite a while. And is there any source for that date or are you just making it up? [[User:TheOneAndOnlyDanky|TheOneAndOnlyDanky]] 18:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 +
::Mostly making it up, but hey, it might be out on either then OR april fools day, since they've been doing it every 4 years now. --[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 11:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
-
:To clarify, when 149 comes out, you would rather have columns of 38, 38, 38, 35 than the 38, 37, 37, 37 that the <tt>&lt;autocolumn></tt> tag would display?&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 23:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
+
== sbemail templates ==
-
::<s>My guess is that you mean to have 37, 37, 37, 38 instead of the 38, 37, 37, 37 which would appear with the autocolumn now.  Am I correct Gus?</s> Oops, I think I was wrong and Tom got it right.  However I think it looks more even the way it is now. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 00:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::Yes, Tom. Think of it this way: If you think of anywhere else you might see columns of text, you expect each column to go to the very bottom of the page or section or wherever, and have it stop wherever it needs to. Here, though, there is no defined bottom, but 38-38-38-35 gives that effect better than 38-37-37-37. It's more aesthetic. [[User:Gus|Gus]] 00:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
+
I had an idea a while ago. What if instead of putting a whole blockquote thingy for an email, say [[strong badathlon]], instead we made a template for the email. I tried it out and it works.
-
::Also, would I be right to assume that <tt>&lt;autocolumn></tt> is programmed into the wiki software, and would require access to the wiki source to change the way it renders the list? [[User:Gus|Gus]] 00:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
== Running along with ze gags! ==
+
The template could be:
 +
<nowiki>{{sbemail165}}</nowiki>
 +
and it would look like:
 +
<blockquote class="lappy email">
 +
<div>subject: the cheat</div>
 +
Strong bad,<br>
 +
For a long time i've been wondering.... How far can you<br>
 +
throw the cheat?  If you don't want to do that, could you<br>
 +
beat the crud out of homestar for no reason?<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Lewis Rudkin<br>
 +
Essex, England.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
What do you guys think? Cool idea? Stupid idea? I have made more templates over on my [[User:HoveringSombrero/Sandbox|sandbox]]. - [[User:HoveringSombrero|HoveringSombrero]] ([[User talk:HoveringSombrero|talk]]) [[File:Shoulder shoomps.png|23px]]
 +
:In theory, the idea isn't bad: I've thought of making a template with all the block quotes.  But making 200 different templates is too tedious and problematic to maintain.  Better to have a single template that has all the quotes in one place, selectable by a switch statement.  That way you can just programmatically pass the email number as a variable (for example <code><nowiki>{{sbemailTemplate|165}}</nowiki></code>; name pending) and maintain the code in a single location.  The downside would be that of performance as template limits might be reached if all 200 emails are included in a single page.  Either way, most likely the already-created templates will be deleted. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 20:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 +
<blockquote class="lappy email">
 +
Dear Homestar Runner Wiki,<br>
 +
<br>
 +
I was wondering why someone was creating hundreds of templates for individual emails that in practice, would only be used once. It seems more logical to have a
 +
single template with spaces that can be customized so it can be used many
 +
times in many different ways, when the needs arise.<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Also, a customizable template would also provide the opportunity for me to
 +
play around with it and write my own hilarious Strong Bad Emails whenever the
 +
mood strikes me.<br>
-
You know the bit at the top of all the articles about SBemail? like Name: pop-up Characters: Strong Bad and all that? why don't we add a new bit to that with Running Gags: Disconnected phone? --[[User:Jetamoo|Coach J]] 14:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
+
[[Crapfully yours|With excrement]],<br>
-
:Well, it is not so prevolent that it appears in *every single* email so to speak.  The [[Floppy Disk]] does, but it has its own page and a reference in the fun facts section.  That is where that would appear. Moreoever, these should link to the Disconnected phone's page, but it doesn't seem to [[Disconnected Phone|have one]] that I know about. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-
::See [[Disconnected Telephone]].&nbsp;-- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 19:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
+
-- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131|68.37.43.131]] 23:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)</blockquote>
 +
::I would only approve of this if they were combined into one template as Stux suggested, and even then I don't think it's necessary. Either way, I think the created templates should be deleted. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig}} 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 +
:::These templates don't do anything except move one instance of code off the page where it appears. I don't see any benefit to this. Templates are useful for formatting, which these don't help with, or repetition, which I'd do a different way if we really thought we needed. (Given that sbemails aren't updating, I also don't think we currently need any formatting templates.) &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Current revision as of 14:04, 6 June 2025

Strong Bad Email Talk: Current | Messages 1-20 | Messages 21-33 | Messages 34-50 | Messages 51-75 | Messages 76-100 | Messages 101-120 | Messages 121-140

Ding! Strong Bad Email is a featured article, which means it showcases an important part of the Homestar Runner body of work and/or highlights the fine work of this wiki. We also might just think it's cool. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, feel free to contribute.
Checklist for new Strong Bad Email: [edit]

Note: ### is used to indicate the new email's number.

  • Update the relevant articles collected in {{StrongBadEmailInfo}}, particularly under the "Emails by" subsection.
  • If you have a flash decompiler:

Contents

[edit] Lappier Era

How are we going to handle categorizing the new sbemails? We still have sbemail206 and too cool under the "Compé Era" section, even though the latter is unquestionably a Lappier Era email. The problem, of course, is that the sbemail menu is still Compé-themed. But we shouldn't keep sticking sbemails in a misleadingly-named section until The Brothers Chaps decide to update their menu. Is there a temporary solution we could use until then? Lira (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

I think there should be a "Lappier Era" section, and maybe a note pointing out that it still uses the Compé menu. It makes more sense than including Lappier emails in the Compé section. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

[edit] Not Quite Strong Bad Email List

A little while ago, I changed the list to use — em dashes instead of (tiny text in parentheses). Not only does it look much better (in my opinion), but it's also more consistent with other lists on the wiki. However, it was reverted because it didn't have as much of a "feel" to it. But I don't think that's necessarily a good thing. How should this list be formatted? hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 19:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Anyone else have an opinion? The em dashes look clean and consistent, and the tiny text looks aesthetically displeasing. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 23:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
i dunno, the tiny text looks nice to me, with text being the same size it looks a bit cluttered — donuts-icon.pngtimmodonuts (T/C) 15:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm for the em dash list. The current style doesn't match any other list on the wiki that I'm aware of, and I think changing text size in-line decreases readability. (What does "has a feel to it" mean anyway?) Lira (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I agree that the full size text seems very cluttered and hard to read. Perhaps there’s a different way to present the information? -166.170.0.121 22:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
That's weird. For me it's the opposite; the full size text is pleasant and readable, while the small text looks cluttered and arbitrary. Maybe we could make it a table, with one column for the email number, one for the title, and one for the description. That way, we can keep the full size text, with borders between each item so it isn't as cluttered. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 23:21, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I am down for tables, I love tables, they make it much easier to digest the information! — donuts-icon.pngtimmodonuts (T/C) 16:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Not so into the table idea. That just sounds unnecessarily bulky and a weird format for the information. Maybe I just need to see a preview, but I still like the standard list with plain text. Lira (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand the desire to table everything. I think a table is best applied in situations when paired with an image or other critical data, such as dates. If it's just an example with an explanation, an ordinary list should suffice. -- 68.37.43.131 03:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I mostly agree. I only suggested it because it seemed like a good way to include full size text without some people finding it cluttered. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 05:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
The thing is it's no more cluttered than any other list of information on the wiki. If the style is cramping people's style, that should be a larger question for another talk page. Myself, I have no trouble reading it. Lira (talk) 16:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Most other places in the wiki don’t have long sentence descriptions within this kind of list. -166.137.90.18 18:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
No? What about character relationships? What about running gags and item pages? How is this different? Lira (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

So far, it seems there are 3 votes for em dashes, 1 votes for parentheses, 1 vote for tables, and 1 vote for an alternative solution. That's probably the closest we'll get to a consensus, so I've made the changes. I'm putting my reasoning here in place of an edit summary:
The wiki's font size is intended to be read comfortably, so this list should stick to that. Like Lira said, if the text looks cluttered, that's a problem with the wiki rather than this list, so the discussion should be moved elsewhere. Every list on the wiki is formatted the same way, and no one has ever complained of their clutteredness before, to my knowledge. This list is no different in content, and that should be reflected in its appearance. Additionally, I think the consistent size looks cleaner and less arbitrary, and the em dash creates a neat separation between title and description. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 21:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

[edit] {reading}

Some emails have {reading} (or some variant) before the email, and some don't. Should we remove them from those emails, or add them to the rest? Or even leave them as is? hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 02:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

For the discussion purposes, when present it looks like this.
Honestly, I'd be in favour of removing such instances. This mostly seems to be present in some older transcripts. I think just the presence of the email template is shorthand for him reading it out loud. --DorianGray 05:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
I am on the fence whether or not we should remove such instances. Although 99% of email entries are read, sometimes they just show up on the screen. Also, "training" the new reader into expecting "hey this block will be read out loud" the first few emails (assuming they somehow went through each email sequentially) wouldn't be a bad thing. And, in a detailed wiki like this, it might not hurt to have the "reading" portion in every email (although it should look sleeker). Now, my own comment ago kind of thwarted an idea I had, and that was: add the "Reading" portion to the email templates or block quotes. However, since this isn't going to be used 100% of the time, it's probably counter productive (instead a template that adds the notice would probably be better -- that is if we keep the notices at all.) --Stux 12:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Since I haven't given my opinion yet, I don't think the notices are necessary. The email box is kind of a continuation of Strong Bad's dialogue, and in cases where it isn't read aloud, the transcript usually states {The following email can be seen:} or something similar. Going straight from the email song to the email makes for a smoother transition.
We don't necessarily have to edit every email page right away, since that would be a huge undertaking. But it would be nice to reach a consensus, just so the notices can be added or removed during unrelated edits, if that makes sense. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 23:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

[edit] Strong Bad Email Menu

Two points to make 1. Why did we never have an article for the Strong Bad Email menus in general when the Toon Time and the speciality sbemail ones have a page? 2. The new menu works completely differently and will probably need it's won page or subsection. Still trying figurue out if there's a pattern to Strong Bad's comments on the emails. Guybrush20X6 02:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I was just wondering that myself. We need to create Strong Bad Email Menu, stat! (Also, I notice you've been adding descriptions to each email's page. I'd suggest holding off on that for now. It's a big project that needs consensus for how it's going to be implemented.) hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 02:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion about descriptions continues at HRWiki:Projects → Toon Descriptions

[edit] anyone like tge sbemaiil homsar?

anyone? no? ok...

[edit] Sbemail209 release date

March 25th, 2022 --J∃ffJMan 17:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

I wouldn’t get my hopes up. I don’t think we’re gonna see it for quite a while. And is there any source for that date or are you just making it up? TheOneAndOnlyDanky 18:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Mostly making it up, but hey, it might be out on either then OR april fools day, since they've been doing it every 4 years now. --J∃ffJMan 11:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

[edit] sbemail templates

I had an idea a while ago. What if instead of putting a whole blockquote thingy for an email, say strong badathlon, instead we made a template for the email. I tried it out and it works.

The template could be: {{sbemail165}} and it would look like:

What do you guys think? Cool idea? Stupid idea? I have made more templates over on my sandbox. - HoveringSombrero (talk)

In theory, the idea isn't bad: I've thought of making a template with all the block quotes. But making 200 different templates is too tedious and problematic to maintain. Better to have a single template that has all the quotes in one place, selectable by a switch statement. That way you can just programmatically pass the email number as a variable (for example {{sbemailTemplate|165}}; name pending) and maintain the code in a single location. The downside would be that of performance as template limits might be reached if all 200 emails are included in a single page. Either way, most likely the already-created templates will be deleted. --Stux 20:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I would only approve of this if they were combined into one template as Stux suggested, and even then I don't think it's necessary. Either way, I think the created templates should be deleted. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
These templates don't do anything except move one instance of code off the page where it appears. I don't see any benefit to this. Templates are useful for formatting, which these don't help with, or repetition, which I'd do a different way if we really thought we needed. (Given that sbemails aren't updating, I also don't think we currently need any formatting templates.) — It's dot com 01:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Email"
Personal tools