User talk:Mycroft.holmes/archive
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
[edit] What's in a name?
Hello, Mycroft --World 14:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC) (sorry, I had to after seeing your user page...)
where did you get mycroft from? heinlein's (sp?) moon is a harsh mistress? user:csours
- Mycroft Holmes is the older brother of Sherlock Holmes. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress gets Mycroft Holmes from this too. Either one... Begone Demon 01:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] STUFF arguments
The STUFF page says, "Do not delete valid arguments (but see notes below); only add them. (You do not have to agree with an argument for it to be considered valid.)" The argument about Mellow Mushroom is perfectly valid. I don't agree with it, but it is still a valid argument. Please stop deleting it, or I will report you to the admins. Heimstern Läufer 
19:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
No, it's not. The MM fact is a stretch at BEST and should have been deleted outright when it was added on October 11. -- Mycroft Holmes 20:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- When on a STUFF page, if a user makes a bad argument, it's still his argument to make. I agree that you shouldn't be deleting other people's arguments, but rather explaining in your own argument why you disagree with it. —
KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] STUFF arguments
The STUFF page says, "Do not delete valid arguments (but see notes below); only add them. (You do not have to agree with an argument for it to be considered valid.)" The argument about Mellow Mushroom is perfectly valid. I don't agree with it, but it is still a valid argument. Please stop deleting it, or I will report you to the admins. Heimstern Läufer 19:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
No, it's not. The MM fact is a stretch at BEST and should have been deleted outright when it was added on October 11. -- Mycroft Holmes 20:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- When on a STUFF page, if a user makes a bad argument, it's still his argument to make. I agree that you shouldn't be deleting other people's arguments, but rather explaining in your own argument why you disagree with it. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] So Negative...
Any reason as to why you never vote accept in STUFF arguments? --Jnelson09 02:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, come to think of it I rarely do either. Can't speak for Mycroft, but in my case I find most STUFFED facts to be lacking in some way, usually speculation or TTATOT. I must be more conservative than other users, I suppose. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Couldn't have said it better myself.--Mycroft Holmes 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, it's one thing to vote against things in STUFF. It's another to create sockpuppets to forward one's agenda. (I know it's bumping after the fact, but it needs to be said). --ISlayedTheKerrek 16:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
