Talk:Jibblies 2 Teaser

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Channel ID

This toon's channel ID is JBZ. Any ideas why? Homestar-Winner (talk) 21:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Probably won't know until the toon is released. --DorianGray 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I know JBz is a candy made by Jelly Belly. Figured there might be a connection because of halloween. 01:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The answer is jibblies (you don't have to believe me, but that was gonna be my guess). — It's dot com 22:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Toon title

I know that Ween Toon 2007 comes from the toons menu, but I don't think that's it. I think that's just a placeholder for the real toon we get next week, and I think this toon should be moved back to something with the word Teaser in it, like Ween Toon 2007 Teaser or something. — It's dot com 22:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Second. Some people may think that it's the actual Halloween toon. Homestar-Winner (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Then we could stick "teaser" next to the link that is on the main page to avoid confusion. I don't know what they're going to do with the WT2007 entry on the toons menu once the main toon comes out, but I can say with some confidence that the toon will not be given this name. They never call a toon "Ween Toon 200X". As far as I see it, Ween Toon 2007 is the most official name we have for this thing. Anything else would just be... unofficial. I think of it as referring to the 2007 Halloween toon, not being a placeholder for it. —BazookaJoe 22:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I disagree. I think the entire entry is a teaser. It's not just the title; everything else is a placeholder, too, from the running time (6:66) to the description ("Who knows what this toon is about?!"). Depending on how all the dust settles next week and whether TBC keep this toon linked, I think it should eventually be called "(Real Name of Halloween Toon) Teaser". — It's dot com 23:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Please, 6:66 is a reference to the devil, not the toon's running time. Nah, just kidding, i think it's a placeholder. — Defender1031*Talk 23:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I think you're on to something there, DeFender. Even if you are just kidding. 6:66 just to be funny. I could see that. Or, maybe it is a placeholder and they orchestrated a toon with a running time of 6:66 (also, just to be funny). Either way. That would be nice. Over six minutes of any kind of toon would be great. OptimisticFool 23:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree that 6:66 is an intentional joke; I'm just saying they made a joke at all because they needed a placeholder. — It's dot com 23:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I can live with that if the dust settles that way, but as far as what we call it in the meantime... meh. This I guess? Why not? We can fix the confusion issue by putting "teaser" on T:whatsnew. —BazookaJoe 23:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

How about Halloween 2007 Teaser?--Darkangel Get offa me! 02:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

We should leave it be until the actual toon comes out. If there's a naming conflict then we could this one to Ween Toon 2007 Teaser or something. suǝʇʇıʞ ƃuıɥɔund05:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Has anyone actually watched the toon till 6:66? It may have something at the end... or it could just be a satanic referance. Also, I agree with Darkangel. —Guard Duck talk 05:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
6:66 isn't a real time, and the toon doesn't last that long. The frame count is too low. Shwoo 07:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't put anything past TBC, so i watched for 8 min and you guys were right. It probably is a joke on their part, because that would be a 7:06 min toon (obviously) and that might actually be the reason there is no new sbemail..... this week anyway. Stinkoblade 23:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, if you had used a Flash seek bar, you'd see that the toon ends after Coach Z finishes his hoots and the crickets fade out. —BazookaJoe 00:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I think we should call it "Ween Toon 2007 Trailer", then put this article into the official page. Just a thought...~16_BIT_MARIO1 00:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC) And, on an unrelated subject, I'm pretty sure that Homsar is Cartmen.

i think it should be called "holloween 2007 teaser trailer" (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)

So it's a trailer for the teaser? Again, we should wait until the dust settles after the real toon comes out. Shall we take the {{rename}} template off the page until then? —BazookaJoe 00:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Whats wrong with calling it Ween Toon Soon, since thats what the main page calls it? Wylie 03:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

It's like how we don't call Marshie vs. Little Girl, "puppetween!" (which is on the main page). The toons menu has always been our source for official titles. —BazookaJoe 03:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I reckon Ween Toon 2007 should be called Halloween Toon 2007 Preview (talk • contribs) 03:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)

I think it should be calles Ween Teaser 2007-DIZZYZAP478

Here's what I think: Leave it until the actual toon comes out, and call this "______ Teaser." Or, if this disappears after the actual toon is released, make this a section on the main toon's article. --Jnelson09 20:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

BAD COMMANDO NAME INDEED!!Seriously man!Try...Ween teaser 07 or Hallow-teaser or even T3H H4LL0W33N T33ZUH!!1!...well not that last one. -Rad

you guys!I saw the toon and it's about Jibblies and called Jibblies 2.Rinop 17:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Your point? The Goblin!! 18:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

He or she is saying that this is "Jibblies Part 1". However I don't think it is, as the only reason the Ween Toon was called "Jibblies Part 2" is so TBC could set up a joke at the end of said toon. MJN SEIFER 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools