User talk:The Chort

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Nitpicking...: reply)
(Minor edits)
Line 11: Line 11:
About [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=hiding&diff=prev&oldid=576688 your edit], a couple = two. You would say that a boyfriend and girlfriend are a couple, yes? And that's two people. So, yeah. No big deal, your reword was probably better anyway. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 21:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
About [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=hiding&diff=prev&oldid=576688 your edit], a couple = two. You would say that a boyfriend and girlfriend are a couple, yes? And that's two people. So, yeah. No big deal, your reword was probably better anyway. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 21:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
:This is the exact reason why I changed the word "couple"; it's too vague and can be interpreted differently by different people. For some people (like me), the word "couple", in some cases, can mean anything from two to, say, half a dozen, even though, it seems, this is not an accurate interpretation. I'm pretty impressed that you bothered to come all the way to my talk page just to tell me this. It's always lonely over here. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
:This is the exact reason why I changed the word "couple"; it's too vague and can be interpreted differently by different people. For some people (like me), the word "couple", in some cases, can mean anything from two to, say, half a dozen, even though, it seems, this is not an accurate interpretation. I'm pretty impressed that you bothered to come all the way to my talk page just to tell me this. It's always lonely over here. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Minor edits ==
 +
 +
Hi!  Just dropped in to leave another nitpicky note on your talk page ;-)  Sorry if it's pretentious of me to say so, but I've noticed you tend to use the "minor edit" checkbox for a lot of edits that I don't consider minor, such as adding or removing content from mainspace articles.  In particular, I wouldn't mark an edit as minor just because it's a reversion if the edit is removing some content — no matter how dubious or recently added the content was. (Vandalism, meh, that's another thing).  In my opinion, anything more than syntax, spelling, making a link, or ''very'' slight rewordings shouldn't be marked as minor.  I know there's no strict rules around here or anything — just wanted to throw that out there for your consideration.  I probably err on the side of not marking things as minor as frequently as maybe I ought to.  You seem to be a great editor. ;-)  {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 00:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:11, 31 July 2008

Click me to leave a message. Convenient, huh?
Archived messages

`-'

Hi. Chipwich 23:09, 1 May 2008
Hi! – The Chort 21:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Nitpicking...

About your edit, a couple = two. You would say that a boyfriend and girlfriend are a couple, yes? And that's two people. So, yeah. No big deal, your reword was probably better anyway. --Mario2.PNG Super Martyo boing! 21:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the exact reason why I changed the word "couple"; it's too vague and can be interpreted differently by different people. For some people (like me), the word "couple", in some cases, can mean anything from two to, say, half a dozen, even though, it seems, this is not an accurate interpretation. I'm pretty impressed that you bothered to come all the way to my talk page just to tell me this. It's always lonely over here. – The Chort 14:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi! Just dropped in to leave another nitpicky note on your talk page ;-) Sorry if it's pretentious of me to say so, but I've noticed you tend to use the "minor edit" checkbox for a lot of edits that I don't consider minor, such as adding or removing content from mainspace articles. In particular, I wouldn't mark an edit as minor just because it's a reversion if the edit is removing some content — no matter how dubious or recently added the content was. (Vandalism, meh, that's another thing). In my opinion, anything more than syntax, spelling, making a link, or very slight rewordings shouldn't be marked as minor. I know there's no strict rules around here or anything — just wanted to throw that out there for your consideration. I probably err on the side of not marking things as minor as frequently as maybe I ought to. You seem to be a great editor. ;-)  Green Helmet 00:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)