Talk:Matt Cake
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(I agree, it is useless.) |
(→Redirect: my opinion) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::I don't see why Matt Cake should have its own page. (And, as I understand it, comparisons (to Super Brave or any other page) aren't the way progress is made. See [[Talk:The Spirit of St. Louis]].) {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | :::I don't see why Matt Cake should have its own page. (And, as I understand it, comparisons (to Super Brave or any other page) aren't the way progress is made. See [[Talk:The Spirit of St. Louis]].) {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::I agree that it doesn't deserve a page. Tire cake is about the same thing and it has no page, as well as everything else in that section. This page is only four sentences long! {{User:Saddy_Dumpington/sig}} 19:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | ::::I agree that it doesn't deserve a page. Tire cake is about the same thing and it has no page, as well as everything else in that section. This page is only four sentences long! {{User:Saddy_Dumpington/sig}} 19:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::I don't see why it shouldn't have it's own page. Our job is not to downgrade the wiki or make information less accessible. Only so much can be put to a table. Also, I don't really like a table output of many things. It slows up my surfing and loading, when I have to load and go through all kinds of information I don't need to access one sentence in the bottom that I ''do'' need. And it can't be good for server, either. It's like loading up the all images list to find a image that starts with a Z. If anybody's asking me, I think we should leave this as is. --[[User:Sysrq868|Sysrq868]] 19:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:43, 23 October 2007
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... how's it scary? --Jnelson09 19:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've removed that part, as it seems non-neutral and unnecessary. Heimstern Läufer
19:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
PATZ or PA7Z
That doesn't look like a T to me. Awexome 18:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Redirect
How does this deserve its own article? It's just a random hidden page. --Trogga 19:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- It deserves a page. If it doesn't, why does Super Brave have it's own page?
Sam the Man
19:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Then why we don't we have an article for every secret page? --Trogga 19:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see why Matt Cake should have its own page. (And, as I understand it, comparisons (to Super Brave or any other page) aren't the way progress is made. See Talk:The Spirit of St. Louis.)
OptimisticFool 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that it doesn't deserve a page. Tire cake is about the same thing and it has no page, as well as everything else in that section. This page is only four sentences long! -
Saddy Dumpington 19:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see why it shouldn't have it's own page. Our job is not to downgrade the wiki or make information less accessible. Only so much can be put to a table. Also, I don't really like a table output of many things. It slows up my surfing and loading, when I have to load and go through all kinds of information I don't need to access one sentence in the bottom that I do need. And it can't be good for server, either. It's like loading up the all images list to find a image that starts with a Z. If anybody's asking me, I think we should leave this as is. --Sysrq868 19:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that it doesn't deserve a page. Tire cake is about the same thing and it has no page, as well as everything else in that section. This page is only four sentences long! -
- I don't see why Matt Cake should have its own page. (And, as I understand it, comparisons (to Super Brave or any other page) aren't the way progress is made. See Talk:The Spirit of St. Louis.)
- Then why we don't we have an article for every secret page? --Trogga 19:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)