Talk:Homestar Runner's Hat

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 14:42, 18 May 2007

Merge

Could this Be fused with Homestar Runner? --Dacheatbot · Communicate 19:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Or Spin My Buzzer? --DorianGray

It's more like Spin my buzzer should be merged into this.-LordQuackingstick 19:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I Definately agree, since his "buzzer" is part of his hat. —Supuhstar*

I don't think so. "Spin my buzzer" is a gag of sorts. --DorianGray

But this seems more important and more general.LordQuackingstick 19:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to see it merged with Homestar Runner on the account of sections like "Homsar's Bowler Hat" and such. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 05:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

If we look at the deletion policy, we see that any part of a character's clothing should be merged into that character's page. For example, The Poopsmith's Shovel got merged into the Poopsmith's character page. So I say Merge into Homestar Runner! Sam the Man 16:31, April 18 2007 (UTC)

Now that the no hat thing has been moved here, is the merge request still needed? --Stux 20:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I vote no — I don't see the "Homestar Runner without his hat" stuff as being apprapriate for Homestar Runner. Trey56 06:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I vote yes, and i don't see why the no hat stuff should be a problem on the main homestsr page. DeFender1031 06:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

It could go on there; I just don't think it's central enough to Homestar to include on his main page. Trey56 06:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I think this is another oppertunity to put a short descriptive section about H*R's hat on his page and say Main article: Homestar Runner's Hat at the top of it. -- Super Martyo boing! 22:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I think that sounds like a reasonable solution... Trey56 22:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Agree with SMB and Trey56. I'll do it ASAP. Sam the Man 11:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)}}

Keep it as it is. Homsar hat is diffent keep it User:moocowmoocow April,28,2007

That's because Homsar's Bowler Hat is more important then Homestar's Hat. Homsar's Hat is way more, oh I don't know, more active then Homestar's Hat. All Homestar's Hat does is spin it's propeller thing and we already have an article like that. Sam the Man

I would like to remind people that the inclusion policy clearly states that pieces of characters' costumes do not belong in their own articles. Merge and redirect into Homestar Runner. Bad Bad Guy 04:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

We should get rid of that merging template on the Homestar Runner page. It doesn't look good and Homestar Runner is a page that gets visited often by many people. Plus its been up there for a while now. Homestar-Winner (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Here's the exact quote, copied from HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines:

Any item that is part of a character's outfit or is closely related to that character (Coach Z's Z, The Poopsmith's Shovel) does not merit a page and should be merged into that character's biography page.

{originally posted at the top of section}

"N-O spells no." - Homestar Runner 75.87.119.195 02:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)me

I don't get it, why can't this be done, there shouldn't be any exceptions, so could we get an explanation as to why it can't be done? ~ SlipStream

Are you asking why it isn't being merged or why it can't have a separate article? Because I already explained why it can't be a separate article. Bad Bad Guy 20:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Keeping it a separate artice violates the inclusion policy and that should be the end of the story. If no one objects by Monday tommorrow I will complete the merging myself. Bad Bad Guy 14:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Homestar wihout his hat: Merge

The following discussion was moved from Talk:Homestar without his hat after it was decided to merge that article with this one:

This article seems like it could fit nicely as part of Homestar's Hat. Now, there's the question about whether that article will be merged with Homestar Runner, but that's a separate issue (and perhaps with this info, an article about Homestar's hat will be significant to stand on its own). Trey56 06:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree on both counts. Loafing 10:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree wholeheartedly ——Supuhstar*

Ditto. --DorianGray 04:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)