Talk:Strong Sad Cheering

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(why not redirect?)
Line 7: Line 7:
:::Sorry for bringing back up a years-old discussion, but I just wanted to give my opinion here. I pretty much agree with Jay... I think this ''might'' have turned into a running gag if there were more than two legitimate examples, but there aren't— [[3 Times Halloween Funjob]] totally doesn't count. So I would say '''delete'''. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 15:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
:::Sorry for bringing back up a years-old discussion, but I just wanted to give my opinion here. I pretty much agree with Jay... I think this ''might'' have turned into a running gag if there were more than two legitimate examples, but there aren't— [[3 Times Halloween Funjob]] totally doesn't count. So I would say '''delete'''. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 15:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
::::Yeah, 3THFJ doesn't count at all. And if we remove it, that would be two examples, so... I thinka '''delete.''' {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
::::Yeah, 3THFJ doesn't count at all. And if we remove it, that would be two examples, so... I thinka '''delete.''' {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::::It's so insignificant and so indefinite in its content, but I feel it would better fit as a redirect to [[Strong Sad Smiling]] since their content is so similar. So I say '''redirect to Strong Sad Smiling.''' - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 23:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:55, 17 May 2016

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


Delete

So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a spoon and should be deleted. RickTommy (edits) 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be given time to develop before making a hasty decision. And that spoons essay is a single user's outdated opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". — Defender1031*Talk 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
My biggest disagreement with the page is that one instance is an instance of the entire cast cheering. If there was a third instance that wasn't a crowd cheer, it would be more pageworthy IMHO. However, even then, it still doesn't strike me as notable or running-gag-like as the KoT booing. Provided you can find a better third instance than Funjob, I would find myself solidly neutral. --Jay (Gobble) 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for bringing back up a years-old discussion, but I just wanted to give my opinion here. I pretty much agree with Jay... I think this might have turned into a running gag if there were more than two legitimate examples, but there aren't— 3 Times Halloween Funjob totally doesn't count. So I would say delete. Lira (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, 3THFJ doesn't count at all. And if we remove it, that would be two examples, so... I thinka delete. e0uZ2kQ.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 22:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
It's so insignificant and so indefinite in its content, but I feel it would better fit as a redirect to Strong Sad Smiling since their content is so similar. So I say redirect to Strong Sad Smiling. - Catjaz63 23:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Sad_Cheering"
Personal tools