User talk:Bad Bad Guy
From Homestar Runner Wiki
m (→Disc Five: update #) |
Bad Bad Guy (Talk | contribs) (→Disc Five) |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<pre>{{dvd|strongbad_email.exe Disc Five}}</pre> | <pre>{{dvd|strongbad_email.exe Disc Five}}</pre> | ||
Thanks, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 00:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | Thanks, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 00:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::By the time I got this, I was on [[bedtime story]]. [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 5 May 2007
Contents |
Welcome!
Welcome to the Homestar Runner Wiki! We're glad to have you as a member. If you need any help, feel free to ask anyone on the welcoming committee. You can also post questions on the FAQ talk page.
Here are some tips to get you started:
- If you need general information, editing tips, or answers to frequently asked questions, check out the help page.
- Before you do any significant editing, be sure to familiarize yourself with our wiki standards.
- Read up on the rules and guidelines for your user space.
- If you're not sure what you can do to help out, head over to The Stick.
- To practice editing, go over to the sandbox.
- If you're looking for more community interaction, you can also register over at our forum.
- If you see an update on homestarrunner.com that isn't listed on the Main Page, put it up here.
- To sign and timestamp a post on a talk page, type four tildes (~~~~).
- Above all, be sure to be bold and have fun!
Feel free to delete this message when you're done reading it. After all, your user space belongs to you. I hope this information is helpful, and that you'll have a good experience contributing to our knowledge-base and our community.
Sincerely,
TheYellowDart—(t/c), and "The Homestar Runner Wiki Welcoming Committee", 04:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Once and only once and again
Hey Bad Bad Guy. Those two pages describe specific DVD featurettes, and as such are different from the larger lists. Thus, they should not be deleted. Talk atcha later. — It's dot com 19:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Link
Hey, saw a recent edit was reverted. In case you wonder why, here's a resource at Wikipedia which explains why and why it's not a great idea to make a big change just to illustrate a point. Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point I find it's an excellent article in that it explains this rather simply. Keep on keepin' on... - Qermaq - (T/C) 
06:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's gone. Bad Bad Guy 17:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
sbemail173
Copied from Talk:sbemail173:
Could someone tell me how everything disappeared? I didn't get to finish what I was writing. Bad Bad Guy 02:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- This page was deleted on the grounds that unreleased emails do not merit an article, and that nonexistant unreleased email articles do not merit talk pages. If you'd like to discuss the concept of an article on this, I'd suggest Talk:Main Page as a better location. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, Bad Bad Guy, I can post the paragraph you had written on this talk page before it was deleted on your talk page if you like. Just let me know. However, this talk page will be deleted soon, for Qermaq's reason.
Trey56 02:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The talk page has been deleted again. Please do not re-create it. Keep on tranglin'! Loafing
03:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I won't revive it, but here was my idea. Strong Bad receives an email asking him if The Paper's really getting replaced. He starts to go into some talk revealing he didn't actually get to by a new printer, but he believes we shouldn't be surprised after his predictions in stunt double and 2 years didn't come true. While he is talking, Strong Sad walks in carrying what appears to be a new printer, so Strong Bad beats him up and returns the DNA Evidence so he will finally leave him alone. Strong Bad asks us all to rejoice that The Paper is staying and proceeds to DELETE a few other emails regarding The Paper. An Easter Egg involves Marzipan discovering the Evidence Strong Bad gave Strong Sad was another tampered piece. Bad Bad Guy 03:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting — that makes me wonder if there's a place on the Fanstuff wiki where users write possible scenarios for sbemail 173... it sounds like the thing that would fit right in there... At any rate, I'm looking forward to sbemail 173 — it'll be interesting to see if TBC remember what Strong Bad said so many emails ago. Trey56 03:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- My theory on this is on my user page. Good idea, though, BBG. :-) --TheYellowDart—(t/c) 03:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
STUFF
Hey there, Bad Bad Guy. STUFF is for making decisions on disputed fun facts, not for proposing new ideas. If you're unsure if your suggested fun fact "This toon might include references to old Disney movies that began with a storybook opening" should be in the article, then you should post it on the articles talk page. Keep on tranglin'! Loafing 22:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- This thread was originally two threads. The second one began here.
Hi there, Bad Bad Guy: STUFF is only for Fun Facts. For other issues, such as the one you raised at Inconsistencies within the Homestar Runner universe, start a discussion on the talk page instead. Keep on tranglin'! Heimstern Läufer 
00:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- How do you explain the existence of Talk:Fourth Wall Breaks#Closed STUFF? Bad Bad Guy 00:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- That is a good question. As far as I can tell, the answer is that those items should not have been STUFF'd. The dates on those are from relatively early in the existence of STUFF; that may have some to do with it. Heimstern Läufer
00:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- That is a good question. As far as I can tell, the answer is that those items should not have been STUFF'd. The dates on those are from relatively early in the existence of STUFF; that may have some to do with it. Heimstern Läufer
Foot in mouth
I guess I was unaware that you were the one who put that comment there... Sorry. DeFender1031 22:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- The funny thing is, this is the 1st message I got since the welcome 1 and the fanfic comments where no one is telling me what not to do! And it's easy not to know that I wrote that. Bad Bad Guy 23:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
STUFF votes
Hey there, Bad Bad Guy. I noticed at STUFF:Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon#Where Credit Is Due that you voted to accept both the original fact and a revision. According to the STUFF rules (see the top of HRWiki:STUFF) you can only vote to accept one version of a fact. By default, only the bottommost of your two votes will count; if this isn't what you want, feel free to delete one of the two votes. Thanks, Trey56 20:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
"Only Time"
- Continued conversation from Talk:Everybody to the Limit#"Only Time", since it no longer pertains to the content of that article.
- It's not "Evident STUFF" that makes me think you hate me; it's "Where Credit is Due." How can you seriously think opening credits will come back soon if the last 6 or 7 Big Toons had none? Bad Bad Guy 00:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- You might be right that there will never be another big toon without opening credits; I personally voted against the fact because I didn't think it was notable enough. But I assure you that I and most other people vote on facts based on their merit, not based on the people who proposed them.
- It's not "Evident STUFF" that makes me think you hate me; it's "Where Credit is Due." How can you seriously think opening credits will come back soon if the last 6 or 7 Big Toons had none? Bad Bad Guy 00:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Honestly, I didn't even know you proposed both of those. I considered the facts, and did my best to make a decision on whether they should be in the respective articles. I'm sure this is true of most other people, too. There's no cause to become personally offended by people declining facts if most of them aren't even aware that you're the one who proposed them. Trey56 01:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Honestly, I didn't even know you proposed both of those. I considered the facts, and did my best to make a decision on whether they should be in the respective articles. I'm sure this is true of most other people, too. There's no cause to become personally offended by people declining facts if most of them aren't even aware that you're the one who proposed them.
Disc Five
Hey there, Bad Bad Guy — before you get too far into the tagging of the Disc Five emails, one correction. The "s" should be lowercase, like so:
{{dvd|strongbad_email.exe Disc Five}}
Thanks, Trey56 00:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- By the time I got this, I was on bedtime story. Bad Bad Guy 00:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
