Talk:Temple of Apshai
From Homestar Runner Wiki
This article is already described somewhere. It's really not that good of an idea, methinks. — Seriously (Talk) 19:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- I must agree with deletion. This is an actual game, Temple of Apshai, and we can always link here. It's a better article there anyways and always will be. That, and I think the article is as good as it can get (needs image, though). Bluebry 19:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree'd with deletion. Man, there a lot of articles being created today. — Has Matt? (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree'd. Dot com, take it away with that deletion button we all now and love. — Seriously (Talk) 19:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Woah! Slow down, three people isn't enough. Bluebry 19:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. - Qermaq - (T/C)
19:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- That makes four. — Seriously (Talk) 19:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Still need more. maybe at seven, this thing'll be in Heaven. Bluebry 19:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Additionally, the sysops typically allow some time to pass before deleting to make sure everyone has a chance to weigh in. But I do agree with deletion. Heimstern Läufer
19:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree as well... --DorianGray
- Additionally, the sysops typically allow some time to pass before deleting to make sure everyone has a chance to weigh in. But I do agree with deletion. Heimstern Läufer
- Still need more. maybe at seven, this thing'll be in Heaven. Bluebry 19:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- That makes four. — Seriously (Talk) 19:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. - Qermaq - (T/C)
- Woah! Slow down, three people isn't enough. Bluebry 19:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree'd. Dot com, take it away with that deletion button we all now and love. — Seriously (Talk) 19:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree'd with deletion. Man, there a lot of articles being created today. — Has Matt? (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Ten minus four, maybe just one more. (Maybe) Bluebry 19:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Deriously. Rhymer Dan, that be me! Bluebry 19:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Deriously?! Oh, and nice edit summary. You really are good at this. — Seriously (Talk) 19:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It was actually featured on the site, has a screenshot, and could conceivably be searched for by someone. — It's dot com 19:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno, dot com. I think you are wrong. Just 'cause it lives on the site, doesn't mean that it's right. The article is puny, and is hard to add more. That will make this easy to ignore. It won't be remembered, not past November. Bluebry 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- It could be made a redirect to the email. - Qermaq - (T/C) 20:01, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- I vote for deletion of this page. There is no point having an article with only two sentences about an obscure videogame reference in a single Strong Bad Email. — Lapper (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- We have lots of articles with short lengths; that really shouldn't be a consideration. And it shouldn't be a redirect, either. First of all, the screenshot is no longer on the email page. Second, if the user wants to see the email, he or she can click and see the email transcript. But if info on the game is really what is wanted, then he or she can click the Wikipedia link without having to search homestar hair for it.— It's dot com 20:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- NO'D!! If someone wanted to search for it, they'd find homestar hair anyway. Try it yourself! Use the "Search" option over there! Tell me what you get! This page, thus, has no reason to exist. And isn't the consensus on this Wiki to not to make pages for minor characters/items that only appear once, aren't terribly important in that one appearance, and unlikely to be repeated? --Jay (Gobble) 20:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Why are you yelling? Why is that ever necessary? — It's dot com
- I'm... um... attempting... to... imitate... Strong...Bad's...method...of...deletion... --Jay (Gobble) 20:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- That wasn't yelling. That was a 'deleted' reference and a pretty good summation of why this page isn't needed. This info could go over to the email page and nothing's lost. - Qermaq - (T/C) 20:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Why are you yelling? Why is that ever necessary? — It's dot com
- NO'D!! If someone wanted to search for it, they'd find homestar hair anyway. Try it yourself! Use the "Search" option over there! Tell me what you get! This page, thus, has no reason to exist. And isn't the consensus on this Wiki to not to make pages for minor characters/items that only appear once, aren't terribly important in that one appearance, and unlikely to be repeated? --Jay (Gobble) 20:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- We have lots of articles with short lengths; that really shouldn't be a consideration. And it shouldn't be a redirect, either. First of all, the screenshot is no longer on the email page. Second, if the user wants to see the email, he or she can click and see the email transcript. But if info on the game is really what is wanted, then he or she can click the Wikipedia link without having to search homestar hair for it.— It's dot com 20:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- I vote for deletion of this page. There is no point having an article with only two sentences about an obscure videogame reference in a single Strong Bad Email. — Lapper (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- It could be made a redirect to the email. - Qermaq - (T/C)
- I dunno, dot com. I think you are wrong. Just 'cause it lives on the site, doesn't mean that it's right. The article is puny, and is hard to add more. That will make this easy to ignore. It won't be remembered, not past November. Bluebry 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It was actually featured on the site, has a screenshot, and could conceivably be searched for by someone. — It's dot com 19:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Deriously?! Oh, and nice edit summary. You really are good at this. — Seriously (Talk) 19:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Redirect'd. — It's dot com 20:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
