HRWiki:April 2005 Sysop Nominations

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
This page is preserved here as a historical archive. There are no nominations being accepted. Please do not add new items.

The Homestar Runner Wiki is now accepting nominations for new sysops.

Please note that these are just nominations. Any final decision will be made by The Admin Team.

This is not a vote. This is not a popularity contest. Do not get rowdy. Do not get your hopes up.

Please use the following format for making nominations:

[edit] Tom

I nominate Tom. He's a cool guy. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I agree. Tom is the coolest. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I also agree. Tom is quite cool. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Tom is not as cool as you think. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I would only like to comment that Tom is in fact the coolest, but I do not believe this reflects on his ability as a sysop. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe Tom should get me a danish. — InterruptorJones 06:04, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, AgentSeethroo, InterruptorJones, JoeyDay, Stu, and Tom
The Homestar Runner Wiki Administration Team


[edit] The Nominees

[edit] Daunrealist

I would have to go with daunrealist. He's always trying to help out the wiki community. Really. daunrealist

  • Um... are you allow'd to do that (besides Tom)? EDSMILDE
    • I doubt it's hurting anything, since it's the mods who make the final call in the end. --Jay 00:33, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • It's not. But this might be a long page if you can nominate yourself. EDSMILDE
  • Neutral. I haven't seen you do too much when it comes to contributing. Maybe it's just me. Yeah, it's probably just me. -- Joshua 13:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Decline. I haven't seen you do much, either. It isn't just you, Joshua. EDIT 18:13, 20 Apr 2005 (CDT): I'll quote you, daunrealist: Write a transcript or something. --Homsar999 20:43, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
  • Agreed. I'll try, Homsar. I really will. --daunrealist
  • And So Will I. I really will, as well. --Homsar999ß 22:09, 23 Apr 2005 (CDT)

[edit] Joshua

He's made tons of contributions here, as well as to the fansuff. EDSMILDE

  • Second
  • Accept! He's always thoroughly involved with the community, and has lots of contributions. - Super Sam 12:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shopiom

I nominate Shopiom for sysop. --Homsar999 20:50, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

[edit] Homsar999

I've been around for a while, and I think I would make a good sysop. Seriously. --Homsar999ß 23:52, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

  • While I have seen you, and I know you've been here a while, unfortunately I do not believe your contributions reflect that of an admin. Posted by: -erson Talk 10:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree with -erson. →FireBird
    • Write a transcript or something. daunrealist
      • I was trying to, for radio when it came out, but somebody else had already done it by the time I had finished it. So don't tell me I've never done a transcript. Haven't I said enough times that I was the person who linked to radio on the Strong Bad Emails page? --Homsar999ß 18:07, 20 Apr 2005 (CDT)
        • It's not his fault. I've wanted to do transcripts a lot but by the time I get home from school to watch the cartoon the wiki page is basically done. So, accept. EDSMILDE
          • Apology. Same here. I'm sorry. Keep your head up though:). daunrealist

[edit] ModestlyHotGirl

I nominate ModestlyHotGirl,1. shes a person with a state of mind that is more stable than anyone else i have ever met. 2. she can get you to understand other people's point of veiws. 3. nicest person i ever met, she's helped me through alot of binds and showed me the way.......of what i cant remember, but shed be great as a Sysop. MHG , out! --User:Modestly Hot Guy--

  • Decline She may be big at the forums, but she doesn't seem to do much here. -- Joshua 01:56, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Decline for the same reason as Joshua. -- Homsar999ß 22:20, 21 Apr 2005 (CDT)
  • Decline Doesn't do much... (which is obvious by now) EDSMILDE
  • Decline Thanks anyway, ModestlyHotGuy, but I'll admit that I don't really do a heck of a lot when it comes to the wiki. Little edits here and there when I get the chance, but, um, no. I'll even admit that I, just now, learned to make my name appear the way it ought to. *weirded out* -ModestlyHotGirl

[edit] Accepted Nominees

[edit] Thunderbird L17 - ACCEPTED!

I nominate T Bird. He seems to be on the ball - Dr Haggis - Talk 05:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I concur. Both of the birds seem to have their acts in the game. In fact, when I first joined I sorta thought they WERE sysops. --Jay 12:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Second Wait... this isn't STUFF. Oh well. --acekirby13 14:58, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • 2nd Great wiki user. EDSMILDE
      • 3rd. Thunderbird would be a great sysop. →FireBird
    • He and FireBird would make great sysops. RAINERtalk
  • Definitely Yes. I appreciate Thunderbird's work on the Wiki, and just like Jay, I thought they were sysops when I joined. --Homsar999 20:46, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
  • Agree'd He would do fine. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Nominat'd! Tbird's pretty awesome and stuff. -- daunrealist
  • Second — Thunderbird has been a great supporter of the wiki. JoeyDay (Talk) 01:54, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • SecondKilroy/talk 04:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Second=Very Yes: Saddy Dumpington's Soolnds

[edit] FireBird - ACCEPTED!

I also nominate F Bird for Sysop. - Dr Haggis - Talk 05:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Again, Second. --Jay 12:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Also Second I really can't decide, but both of them would be great choices. --acekirby13 14:59, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • He and Thunderbird would make great sysops. RAINERtalk
    • Second--Mr. Sparkle 11:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Decline He seems to hate absolutely every page I create, even if a sysop recommended the page.Lord Pikachon 15:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • first I really think he would be kewl to be the sysops.
  • Decline. Something about FireBird rubs me the wrong way. --Homsar999 20:47, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
  • Accept I think Firebird has consistently good judgement. Aurora the Homestar Coder 04:20, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Agreed Both him and T-Bird are fine by me, but if only one of them could be sysop, I'd rather have Firebird. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Accept While ThunderBird made alot of important pages (which are all very good), FireBird handels trolls vary well. Sysop need to monitor the wiki, and FireBird does it in an exelent way. E.L. Cool
  • Accept Yeah, I worked with Firebird on a page, he's a pretty smart person, knew what he was doing making the page, knew the stuff about Homestarrunner page, too. --Strongbaditude
  • Second — Firebird has been a consistent contributor. JoeyDay (Talk) 01:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • SecondKilroy/talk 04:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support.StrongstarRunbad 15:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Second Saddy Dumpington's Soolnds
  • Second Firebird rocks. He's been a wiki user longer than most, and he's also very active, buzzing around here fixing stuff all the time. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 00:16, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jay - ACCEPTED!

I dont know if he's already a sysop, but if hes not, he seems to be on the ball. I nominate Jay. ---erson 15:54, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

When I first met him I thought he was by how he acted. Nominate'd! - Joshua 15:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Jay is a great contributor to this wiki. He'd make a perfect sysop. —Kilroy/talk 19:49, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Definately. He's made tons of contributions.EDSMILDE
  • Second'd - I like what he's done with regards to STUFFing (but then, that's pretty much all I work on anyways). --TheEggman 00:17, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • And theres nothing wrong with that! Its mostly where I spend my time.--Posted by -erson 01:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I agree. Jay would be awesome. →FireBird
  • Yes sir Jay for Sysop - Dr Haggis - Talk 04:26, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I most definately think that Jay would be a good choice. -From an annonymous semi-contributor
  • Jay=the man. He'd make a great sysop.
  • Second. I think he cares about the Wiki. Aurora the Homestar Coder 00:06, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Second. Though we don't always agree on STUFF, Jay seems to know what he's doing around here. --acekirby13 12:37, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Decline. Jay seems to have a bit of an attitude. Not good if you become a sysop. --Homsar999 20:42, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
    • True, but I'm sure he can work on it. -- Posted by: -erson Talk 22:37, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] furrykef - ACCEPTED!

furrykef's awesome. furrykef's weird. furrykef's awesome and furrykef's weird. And I'll never forget the way it was, grrrl! - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:19, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

EDIT: I submitted this one half-jokingly (I know nobody else would have nominated me since I've been so inactive lately anyway), but I am probably qualified for the job because I've long been a sysop at Wikibooks, nearly have a lock on sysophood at Wikipedia (they're still voting at this time but it looks like, to my surprise, I'm a shoe-in), run my own Wikicity called gameinfo, etc. So vote for me if you wanna. But I'm probably not actually gonna care much either way. :P - furrykef (Talk at me) 12:38, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

EDIT #2: Got the Wikipedia sysophood now :P ... got my sysophood here, for that matter.

  • I Second that Second. Homsar999ß 14:33, 20 Apr 2005 (CDT)
  • Super SecondKilroy/talk 13:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Second — I've wanted furrykef on the sysop staff for a while but haven't seen him around here. If he's up to it, he'd be a great sysop. JoeyDay (Talk) 01:46, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Oh, I'm around, just not often around. An e-mail or a post on my Wikipedia talk page or something is bound to get my attention. And I do hang out from time to time. - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:18, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kilroy - ACCEPTED!

Thirdly and lastly, I nominate Kilroy. --Homsar999ß 14:41, 20 Apr 2005 (CDT)

Possibly my #1 choice. Keep it up. EDSMILDE

Second Yay!!! Kilroy for sysop! Saddy Dumpington's Soolnds

  • Yes Kilroy is a solid ever-present contributor - Dr Haggis - Talk 00:53, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Hey, I forgot about Kilroy. Yea, he's a good contributer. I'll nominate. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 02:52, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Paper - ACCEPTED!

From what Ive seen of his work, The Paper is a great contributer. But I'm not on ehough to be completely sure. What do you think--Posted by -erson 18:13, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I'd say that too. He's a great contributor, and he IS a great admin on He has the smarts to be a sysop, too. --thatkidsam 22:28, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Sysop = Very Yes T-The-P has shown very good judgement and has a sound collection of solid edits. - Dr Haggis - Talk 04:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • The Paper and the Admins, together at last! Posted by: -erson Talk 10:44, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Accept. Seems like a decent admin can be found here. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Homestar Coder - ACCEPTED!

No one nomitated Homestar Coder, but he became an sysop anyway.

She. --Jay (Talk) 19:27, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Personal tools