HRWiki:April 2005 Sysop Nominations

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 11:59, 20 April 2005

The Homestar Runner Wiki is now accepting nominations for new sysops.

Please note that these are just nominations. Any final decision will be made by The Admin Team.

This is not a vote. This is not a popularity contest. Do not get rowdy. Do not get your hopes up.

Please use the following format for making nominations:

Tom

I nominate Tom. He's a cool guy. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I agree. Tom is the coolest. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I also agree. Tom is quite cool. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I disagree. Tom is not as cool as you think. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I would only like to comment that Tom is in fact the coolest, but I do not believe this reflects on his ability as a sysop. -- Tom 04:33, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I believe Tom should get me a danish. — InterruptorJones 06:04, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, AgentSeethroo, InterruptorJones, JoeyDay, Stu, and Tom
The Homestar Runner Wiki Administration Team

The Nominees

Thunderbird L17

I nominate T Bird. He seems to be on the ball - Dr Haggis - Talk 05:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I concur. Both of the birds seem to have their acts in the game. In fact, when I first joined I sorta thought they WERE sysops. --Jay 12:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Second Wait... this isn't STUFF. Oh well. --acekirby13 14:58, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • 2nd Great wiki user. EDSMILDE
    • 3rd. Thunderbird would be a great sysop. →FireBird
  • He and FireBird would make great sysops. RAINER^talk
• Definitely Yes. I appreciate Thunderbird's work on the Wiki, and just like Jay, I thought they were sysops when I joined. --Homsar999 20:46, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
• Agree'd He would do fine. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

FireBird

I also nominate F Bird for Sysop. - Dr Haggis - Talk 05:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Again, Second. --Jay 12:47, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Also Second I really can't decide, but both of them would be great choices. --acekirby13 14:59, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • He and Thunderbird would make great sysops. RAINER^talk
  • Second--Mr. Sparkle 11:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Decline He seems to hate absolutely every page I create, even if a sysop recommended the page.Lord Pikachon 15:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• first I really think he would be kewl to be the sysops.
• Decline. Something about FireBird rubs me the wrong way. --Homsar999 20:47, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)
• Accept I think Firebird has consistently good judgement. Aurora the Homestar Coder 04:20, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Agreed Both him and T-Bird are fine by me, but if only one of them could be sysop, I'd rather have Firebird. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jay

I dont know if he's already a sysop, but if hes not, he seems to be on the ball. I nominate Jay. ---erson 15:54, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

When I first met him I thought he was by how he acted. Nominate'd! - Joshua 15:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Jay is a great contributor to this wiki. He'd make a perfect sysop. —Kilroy/_talk 19:49, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Definately. He's made tons of contributions.EDSMILDE
• Second'd - I like what he's done with regards to STUFFing (but then, that's pretty much all I work on anyways). --TheEggman 00:17, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • And theres nothing wrong with that! Its mostly where I spend my time.--Posted by -erson 01:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I agree. Jay would be awesome. →FireBird
• Yes sir Jay for Sysop - Dr Haggis - Talk 04:26, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I most definately think that Jay would be a good choice. -From an annonymous semi-contributor
• Jay=the man. He'd make a great sysop.
• Second. I think he cares about the Wiki. Aurora the Homestar Coder 00:06, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Decline. Jay seems to have a bit of an attitude. Not good if you become a sysop. --Homsar999 20:42, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

Daunrealist

I would have to go with daunrealist. He's always trying to help out the wiki community. Really. daunrealist

• Um... are you allow'd to do that (besides Tom)? EDSMILDE
  • I doubt it's hurting anything, since it's the mods who make the final call in the end. --Jay 00:33, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not. But this might be a long page if you can nominate yourself. EDSMILDE
• Neutral. I haven't seen you do too much when it comes to contributing. Maybe it's just me. Yeah, it's probably just me. -- Joshua 13:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Decline. I haven't seen you do much, either. It isn't just you, Joshua. --Homsar999 20:43, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

Joshua

He's made tons of contributions here, as well as to the fansuff. EDSMILDE

Second 216.120.190.30

The Paper

From what Ive seen of his work, The Paper is a great contributer. But I'm not on ehough to be completely sure. What do you think--Posted by -erson 18:13, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I'd say that too. He's a great contributor, and he IS a great admin on Strongfans.com. He has the smarts to be a sysop, too. --thatkidsam 22:28, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Sysop = Very Yes T-The-P has shown very good judgement and has a sound collection of solid edits. - Dr Haggis - Talk 04:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• The Paper and the Admins, together at last! _{Posted by:} -erson ^Talk 10:44, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Accept. Seems like a decent admin can be found here. -- Joshua 11:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Shopiom

I nominate Shopiom for sysop. --Homsar999 20:50, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

furrykef

furrykef's awesome. furrykef's weird. furrykef's awesome and furrykef's weird. And I'll never forget the way it was, grrrl! - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:19, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Second. — InterruptorJones[[]] 05:12, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Homsar999

I've been around for a while, and I think I would make a good sysop. Seriously. --Homsar999^ß 23:52, 19 Apr 2005 (CDT)

• While I have seen you, and I know you've been here a while, unfortunately I do not believe your contributions reflect that of an admin. _{Posted by:} -erson ^Talk 10:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)