Talk:New Paper

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Merge with The Paper?)
(→Merge with The Paper?: too soon clanky)
Line 23: Line 23:
wait tell next sbemail and then we make a decision {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 16:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
wait tell next sbemail and then we make a decision {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 16:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
:I'm pretty sure that the inkjet printer is going to stick around. '''No Merge''' {{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}}
:I'm pretty sure that the inkjet printer is going to stick around. '''No Merge''' {{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}}
 +
::That's absolute speculation, however. That fact is unknown to us, which is why I suggest suspending debate on this until after another email comes out. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:16, 18 July 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Contents

Anything Else?

If anyone wants to correct my horrible grammer or ad more info, please do, and take a better screenshot, and thanks to Jay who created this page. I am also going to remove the stub marker, this is about all we know about the new paper.--~ SlipStream 11:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Ink

The colours look a bit off at the bottom, is that normal for new printers? 84.65.197.19 16:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it is. Hagurumon 20:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Shy Paper?

I think New Paper didn't go Preeow because it was too shy and needs some introducing. Whaddya think?

This would be better suited for the Forum. --DorianGray 20:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge with The Paper?

Should the new paper really have it's own page? I think it should it be merged with The Paper. --Mario2.PNG Super Martyo boing! 02:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I think we should wait for the next sbemail to see what happens. Loafing 02:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree, it's majorly premature to be having this discussion. - Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 03:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
If we have separate articles for Tangerine Dreams and The Cheat's iMac (2006) then these should not be merged. Bad Bad Guy 02:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
If the nEW Paper sticks around, we need to keep both Papers seperate. They're entirely different objects, so they need their own articles. Besides, The Paper's article is quite long as it is. I don't think it should be extended any more. No merge. – The Chort 11:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
So can we remove the template? Homsar44withpie 01:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

wait tell next sbemail and then we make a decision Slipknot6477 16:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that the inkjet printer is going to stick around. No Merge Super!SantanaDuper!
That's absolute speculation, however. That fact is unknown to us, which is why I suggest suspending debate on this until after another email comes out. - Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 22:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:New_Paper"
Personal tools