User talk:Qermaq

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 23:13, 25 October 2006

Website sighting

How can we tell that the IP address was telling the truth about the person saying that?--H*Bad 04:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

How can we tell Thunderbird was telling the truth about the Flashforward conference? - Qermaq - (^T/C)  05:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Well he can be trusted. IPs, well we just don't know about them. It could be like Willy on Wheels's IP, just here to feed us false information.--H*Bad 05:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

While an anonny is more trustworthy than a known user, it remains that there's absolutely no good reason anyone would add such detail without having actually found it out. It is possible, yes, that someone's lying. It's really unlikely, in my opinion. But if you really want to get the community's point of view, bring it up on the Website Sightings talk. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  05:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Nice sig you've got there Qermaq... oh yeah and one more thing...

Could you show me how to make an archives list for my talk page like the one you've got? Thanks. Inandoutburger (^T/C) 23:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Easy. Just look at the source of mine. The contents is a template include, that's at User:Qermaq/archivetemplate. Then the talk stuff is copied to a new page and linked from there. I patterned my TOC off thew archives for the Main Page, others do it differently. Look around to see what others do. And hey, your sig's looking sharp too! - Qermaq - (^T/C)  06:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey thanks for the userbox tip and link. ((User:Woodavers))

Anytime. Did you see how four of these ~ becomes an automatic sig? Keep on tranglin'! - Qermaq - (^T/C)  22:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Pool Rules

Qermaq, i noticed here that you reverted "Pool Rules" back to "'ool rules". I'm of the opinion that it should be "Pool Rules", since that's the title on Strong Bad's sign. Nobody likes double reverting, though, so I thought I'd bring it up here. Thanks, Trey56 22:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Is it that way on the sign? I hadn't noticed. That's cool. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  02:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

SQT²

Cuatro veces!

Congradurations! --אוקאלייליי (Ookelaylay)

nice try jimmy brown

i have decyphered your screen name...and it is... ERMA!!! that's right, no more hiding now! you've been found out Erma Q! csours 05:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Bowl games

You were right to delete that "fact", but during the CGNU commercial, the view of the clearly-unfinished website reads "check back after the bowl games!" --Jay (Gobble) 16:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, that's where it is. I had forgotten! - Qermaq - (^T/C)  16:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

And, along the same token, I didn't insert any of these. --Jay (Gobble) 04:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

No? (But I never meant it personally - I needed to vent, and you were there....) - Qermaq - (^T/C)  09:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

HELP!!!

Hi, I'm a new user. And, Qermaq, I was hoping you could help me on some things. I do not feel well talking about it on this page, so I will leave a message on my talk page.

 User:Strong Badman/sig 11:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

PS: SEE? ^^^^^^^

THANKS!!!!

I'm back on my Strong Badman account! and it's all thanks to you, It's dot com, and Thunderbird!!!

Cite one example

Actually, if you look at my edit summary really closely, I cited three. ;) --Jay (Gobble) 02:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Subtitles

Cool tips for making good subtitles! Do you want to move them over to HRWiki:Subtitles? You could make a new section for tips, or just merge them with the Standards section. :-)  Loafing 01:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

If you think it'd be a good addition, sure. We should list some excellent examples of subtitling for reference. Ideas? (open to all, as usual) - Qermaq - (^T/C)  01:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm, we can always add more examples later on. It's a wiki! ;-) This one here shows how to deal with asynchronous sfx and speech: Subtitles:sbemail7/en. But maybe you should check it if it adheres to your standards before you add it... I'll go and have a think which other ones I like.  Loafing 01:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Username

You edited my username without my permission, and decided I'd rather be within bounds? You're as bad as those fascists at Wikipedia... --The Ugly Guy 02:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome to your opinion. We coexist here as a community in part due to agreement on consensus. One consensus of this committee is expressed at HRWiki:Signature and as a member of this community you are expected to either agree or disagree, and any disagreement is expected to be mature and reasoned. Please express what objection you have to the policy stated at HRWiki:Signature on its talk page. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  02:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I'd had no issue with changing my username per rules (which seems useless, but whatever), but rather than changing my name for me, why not inform me, and allow me to have all future contributions changed? That's my main point... the rules isn't unreasonable, you're actions are.--Saxon the Deutschmaster 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Saxon. What clues was I afforded to assume you wanted to change your name? I support that through the proper channels. But you did not say you wanted that, and this edit led me to believe you wanted to be known by this name, so I did not know you wanted to know how to change. Sorry I could not read your mind. And please do not forget to post any objections to the name policy at HRWiki talk:Signature. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  03:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

You have a nasty habit of editing my posts. I didn't have a "standard" name because I missed that particular policy. The moment I learned of it, I changed. Why assume the worst?--Saxon the Deutschmaster 03:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Number one, I did not edit your above post in ANY way. I challenge you to show how I did. Second, you have changed your signature, and that pleases me. I have no argument there. Please continue to use a conforming signature. And I hope through a reread you will see that I assumed nothing but the best from you. I look forward to ongoing positive edits. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  03:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

You said yourself that you changed my username... and my paragraph got intented, which I don't do, ever. That happened somewhere between my first post here and your succeeding posts. "Please contnue to use a conforming signature" ? Yeesh, that has wikipedia trustee written all over that. Why would you need to say that if you "assume nothing but the best" from me?--Saxon the Deutschmaster 03:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, here's my reply. I did not change your username. I changed your signature to comply to the policy here. In other words, I did you a favor. Then I indented your post, which is standard here. Again, I did you a favor. Please feel free to criticize me when I in fact do not do you a favor. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  23:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

So you are simultaneously denying editing my posts and claiming that you did me a favor. Thanks; with favors like those, don't ever do me any harm.--Saxon the Deutschmaster 23:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Template Wording

In response to your question earlier, I went over to the Help:Template page to take a looksie and the wording makes it clear as a bell! This way, newer users can have more of the helpful words and less of the confusing WikiSyntax, while still absorbing all neccesary information. Great job! -Brightstar Shiner 00:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)