User talk:Qermaq
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(revert, and reply) |
(→Username) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
You edited my username without my permission, and decided I'd rather be within bounds? You're as bad as those fascists at Wikipedia... --[[User:Saxonjf|The Ugly Guy]] 02:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | You edited my username without my permission, and decided I'd rather be within bounds? You're as bad as those fascists at Wikipedia... --[[User:Saxonjf|The Ugly Guy]] 02:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:You're welcome to your opinion. We coexist here as a community in part due to agreement on consensus. One consensus of this committee is expressed at [[HRWiki:Signature]] and as a member of this community you are expected to either agree or disagree, and any disagreement is expected to be mature and reasoned. Please express what objection you have to the policy stated at [[HRWiki:Signature]] on its [[HRWiki talk:Signature|talk page]]. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | :You're welcome to your opinion. We coexist here as a community in part due to agreement on consensus. One consensus of this committee is expressed at [[HRWiki:Signature]] and as a member of this community you are expected to either agree or disagree, and any disagreement is expected to be mature and reasoned. Please express what objection you have to the policy stated at [[HRWiki:Signature]] on its [[HRWiki talk:Signature|talk page]]. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'd had no issue with changing my username per rules (which seems useless, but whatever), but rather than changing my name for me, why not inform me, and allow me to have all future contributions changed? That's my main point... the rules isn't unreasonable, you're actions are.--[[User:Saxonjf|Saxon the Deutschmaster]] 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:34, 20 October 2006
Archives
|
---|
Contents |
Website sighting
How can we tell that the IP address was telling the truth about the person saying that?--H*Bad 04:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- How can we tell Thunderbird was telling the truth about the Flashforward conference? - Qermaq - (T/C)
05:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- While an anonny is more trustworthy than a known user, it remains that there's absolutely no good reason anyone would add such detail without having actually found it out. It is possible, yes, that someone's lying. It's really unlikely, in my opinion. But if you really want to get the community's point of view, bring it up on the Website Sightings talk. - Qermaq - (T/C)
05:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- While an anonny is more trustworthy than a known user, it remains that there's absolutely no good reason anyone would add such detail without having actually found it out. It is possible, yes, that someone's lying. It's really unlikely, in my opinion. But if you really want to get the community's point of view, bring it up on the Website Sightings talk. - Qermaq - (T/C)
Nice sig you've got there Qermaq... oh yeah and one more thing...
Could you show me how to make an archives list for my talk page like the one you've got? Thanks.
Inandoutburger (T/C) 23:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Easy. Just look at the source of mine. The contents is a template include, that's at User:Qermaq/archivetemplate. Then the talk stuff is copied to a new page and linked from there. I patterned my TOC off thew archives for the Main Page, others do it differently. Look around to see what others do. And hey, your sig's looking sharp too! - Qermaq - (T/C)
06:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey thanks for the userbox tip and link. ((User:Woodavers))
- Anytime. Did you see how four of these ~ becomes an automatic sig? Keep on tranglin'! - Qermaq - (T/C)
22:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Pool Rules
Qermaq, i noticed here that you reverted "Pool Rules" back to "'ool rules". I'm of the opinion that it should be "Pool Rules", since that's the title on Strong Bad's sign. Nobody likes double reverting, though, so I thought I'd bring it up here. Thanks, Trey56 22:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Is it that way on the sign? I hadn't noticed. That's cool. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
SQT2
Congradurations! --אוקאלייליי (Ookelaylay)
nice try jimmy brown
i have decyphered your screen name...and it is... ERMA!!! that's right, no more hiding now! you've been found out Erma Q! csours
05:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Bowl games
You were right to delete that "fact", but during the CGNU commercial, the view of the clearly-unfinished website reads "check back after the bowl games!" --Jay (Gobble) 16:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
HELP!!!
Hi, I'm a new user. And, Qermaq, I was hoping you could help me on some things. I do not feel well talking about it on this page, so I will leave a message on my talk page.
User:Strong Badman/sig 11:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
PS: SEE? ^^^^^^^
THANKS!!!!
I'm back on my Strong Badman account! and it's all thanks to you, It's dot com, and Thunderbird!!!
Cite one example
Actually, if you look at my edit summary really closely, I cited three. ;) --Jay (Gobble) 02:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Subtitles
Cool tips for making good subtitles! Do you want to move them over to HRWiki:Subtitles? You could make a new section for tips, or just merge them with the Standards section. :-) Loafing 01:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- If you think it'd be a good addition, sure. We should list some excellent examples of subtitling for reference. Ideas? (open to all, as usual) - Qermaq - (T/C)
01:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm, we can always add more examples later on. It's a wiki! ;-) This one here shows how to deal with asynchronous sfx and speech: Subtitles:sbemail7/en. But maybe you should check it if it adheres to your standards before you add it... I'll go and have a think which other ones I like. Loafing
01:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm, we can always add more examples later on. It's a wiki! ;-) This one here shows how to deal with asynchronous sfx and speech: Subtitles:sbemail7/en. But maybe you should check it if it adheres to your standards before you add it... I'll go and have a think which other ones I like. Loafing
Username
You edited my username without my permission, and decided I'd rather be within bounds? You're as bad as those fascists at Wikipedia... --The Ugly Guy 02:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome to your opinion. We coexist here as a community in part due to agreement on consensus. One consensus of this committee is expressed at HRWiki:Signature and as a member of this community you are expected to either agree or disagree, and any disagreement is expected to be mature and reasoned. Please express what objection you have to the policy stated at HRWiki:Signature on its talk page. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I'd had no issue with changing my username per rules (which seems useless, but whatever), but rather than changing my name for me, why not inform me, and allow me to have all future contributions changed? That's my main point... the rules isn't unreasonable, you're actions are.--Saxon the Deutschmaster 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)