User talk:Mycroft.holmes
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→So Negative...) |
(→So Negative...) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Couldn't have said it better myself.--[[User:Mycroft.holmes|Mycroft Holmes]] 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ::Couldn't have said it better myself.--[[User:Mycroft.holmes|Mycroft Holmes]] 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Yeah, well, it's one thing to vote against things in STUFF. It's another to create sockpuppets to forward one's agenda. (I know it's bumping after the fact, but it needs to be said). --[[User:ISlayedTheKerrek|ISlayedTheKerrek]] 16:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:41, 16 March 2007
Archive
So Negative...
Any reason as to why you never vote accept in STUFF arguments? --Jnelson09 02:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, come to think of it I rarely do either. Can't speak for Mycroft, but in my case I find most STUFFED facts to be lacking in some way, usually speculation or TTATOT. I must be more conservative than other users, I suppose. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Couldn't have said it better myself.--Mycroft Holmes 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, it's one thing to vote against things in STUFF. It's another to create sockpuppets to forward one's agenda. (I know it's bumping after the fact, but it needs to be said). --ISlayedTheKerrek 16:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
