Talk:The Dapper Swindler
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Slipknot6477 (Talk | contribs) (tbd template) |
m (→Template: more) |
||
(includes 16 intermediate revisions) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{ | + | {{deletedtalk|merge=The Sneak}} |
I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST) | I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST) | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... [[user:haldo]] | oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... [[user:haldo]] | ||
+ | :Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. '''Keep'''. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say '''merge''' with [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that [[Biscuit Dough Hands Man]] is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. [[user:haldo]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we do end up deleeting this page, we should have a notice on [[the sneak]]'s page requesting that no one brings it back. [[user:haldo]] | ||
+ | :If the information is moved to The Sneak's page, we don't need to leave a note to tell that it's been moved from a deleted article. Oh, and '''merge'''. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 19:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Yes, let's merge. Info here is a bit too scarce, and we should be able to include it at [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Good idea. Both this article and The Sneak's page looks a bit bare. So '''merge'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::I will throw in with a '''merge''' vote as well. The Dapper Swindler is a marginal "character", and though it is similar to Biscuit Dough Hands Man, it's a one off so far. Merging with The Sneak makes the most sense. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 20:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ok, teh request that no one brings up the dappr swindler is unessicary, but we should still have a re direct to [[the sneak]]'s page. | ||
+ | :Have no fear, my friend. If we merge this article to The Sneak, the page will automatically be turned into a redirect to said article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Well, I hope you like "cool" painting, because this has got to go. '''Merge'''. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Template == | ||
+ | |||
+ | This article really isn't deleted. I don't think it needs a deleted article template. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Template%3Adeletedtalk&diff=515570&oldid=513723 changed}} {{t|deletedtalk}} so that it can account better for merged pages — I think this should work a bit better... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 22:36, 10 November 2007
I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. - Dr Haggis - Talk 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
- I agree. I've added the text back. -- Tom 19:30, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
Contents |
[edit] no
this belongs on The Sneak-- Benol, aka Coach B 20:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)user:haldo
- Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --DorianGray 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] yes
this belongs on its own page. — talk Bubsty edits 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Old Timey manifestation of Biscuit Dough Hands Man?
As I was reading this page, I was reminded of the poor rendering of Strong Bad as Biscuit Dough Hands Man. Could this be another accidental equivalent?
Well, if The Dapper Swindler was a dubious rendering of Old-Timey Strong Bad, I'd say yes. But since it isn't... 71.231.56.40 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --Jrgilby 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What The CRAP?!
Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? — Haldo (Talk | contribs) 19:50 (left unsigned)
oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... user:haldo
- Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. Keep. Sam the Man 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that Biscuit Dough Hands Man is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. user:haldo
If we do end up deleeting this page, we should have a notice on the sneak's page requesting that no one brings it back. user:haldo
- If the information is moved to The Sneak's page, we don't need to leave a note to tell that it's been moved from a deleted article. Oh, and merge. — SamFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 19:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, teh request that no one brings up the dappr swindler is unessicary, but we should still have a re direct to the sneak's page.
- Have no fear, my friend. If we merge this article to The Sneak, the page will automatically be turned into a redirect to said article. – The Chort 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I hope you like "cool" painting, because this has got to go. Merge. OptimisticFool 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template
This article really isn't deleted. I don't think it needs a deleted article template. Sam the Man 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- I changed {{deletedtalk}} so that it can account better for merged pages — I think this should work a bit better... Trey56 22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)