Talk:Cats
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→No talking kitties here) |
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) ({{deletedtalk}}) |
||
(includes 13 intermediate revisions) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{ | + | {{deletedtalk}} |
==Tigers== | ==Tigers== | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
10 pts. for the ref. Anydangway, for the reasons listed on [[Talk:Frogs]], I think this should go. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | 10 pts. for the ref. Anydangway, for the reasons listed on [[Talk:Frogs]], I think this should go. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
:This one accually shows 3 cats. Now some of the appearences can go, like 'sitten with a kitten'.--[[User:H*Bad|H*Bad]] 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | :This one accually shows 3 cats. Now some of the appearences can go, like 'sitten with a kitten'.--[[User:H*Bad|H*Bad]] 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Yes, three cats appear, but cats are common animals and the references really aren't all that notable. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Example: the article [[Paint]] is also common, yet it was allowed to stay.--[[User:H*Bad|H*Bad]] 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::Those are related, though: the cans are all the same style and have the same font on them. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::If you feel that that article isn't valid, then bring it up on its talk page. Cats are common animals, and are bound to appear sometime on the site. I would not mind to see this go. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::But cats show up and are acknowledged by the characters.--[[User:H*Bad|H*Bad]] 23:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::Yes, but they are common animals. They are barely (if at all) related and I don't feel that they are article worthy. {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 23:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::'''Delete''' for the same reasons as Jay and RL. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 16:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::::'''Delete'''. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 17:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::::'''Delete.''' All your base are belong to us. [[User:Trey56|CATS]] 02:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::::::'''Delete.'''But shouldn't we get rid of [[Dogs]] too?[[User:Geshmalderborgen|Geshmalder]] 21:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::::::::::'''Delete''' I think so. --[[User:Sam Goldfish|Sam Goldfish]] 16:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 04:34, 24 November 2007
![]() |
[edit] Tigers
Tigers aren't considered cats are they? Maggot Man (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- They are classified under the cat family. So yes.--H*Bad 22:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No talking kitties here
10 pts. for the ref. Anydangway, for the reasons listed on Talk:Frogs, I think this should go. --Jay (Gobble) 22:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- This one accually shows 3 cats. Now some of the appearences can go, like 'sitten with a kitten'.--H*Bad 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, three cats appear, but cats are common animals and the references really aren't all that notable. --Jay (Gobble) 22:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Example: the article Paint is also common, yet it was allowed to stay.--H*Bad 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Those are related, though: the cans are all the same style and have the same font on them. --Jay (Gobble) 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you feel that that article isn't valid, then bring it up on its talk page. Cats are common animals, and are bound to appear sometime on the site. I would not mind to see this go. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 22:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- But cats show up and are acknowledged by the characters.--H*Bad 23:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but they are common animals. They are barely (if at all) related and I don't feel that they are article worthy. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 23:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons as Jay and RL. Heimstern Läufer
16:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. All your base are belong to us. CATS 02:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.But shouldn't we get rid of Dogs too?Geshmalder 21:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I think so. --Sam Goldfish 16:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.But shouldn't we get rid of Dogs too?Geshmalder 21:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. All your base are belong to us. CATS 02:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons as Jay and RL. Heimstern Läufer
- Yes, but they are common animals. They are barely (if at all) related and I don't feel that they are article worthy. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 23:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- But cats show up and are acknowledged by the characters.--H*Bad 23:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you feel that that article isn't valid, then bring it up on its talk page. Cats are common animals, and are bound to appear sometime on the site. I would not mind to see this go. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 22:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Those are related, though: the cans are all the same style and have the same font on them. --Jay (Gobble) 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Example: the article Paint is also common, yet it was allowed to stay.--H*Bad 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, three cats appear, but cats are common animals and the references really aren't all that notable. --Jay (Gobble) 22:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)