Talk:Fully Human Characters
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Page title) |
(→Page title: agreement) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is there something better than "Clearly human characters" that we could consider? I realize it's subtly different from "Human characters", but it just seems not-quite-right to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | Is there something better than "Clearly human characters" that we could consider? I realize it's subtly different from "Human characters", but it just seems not-quite-right to me. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yeah, I thought about that when I made [[Human characters]] as a redirect. It kinda reminds me of how "Obviously Phony Aliases" was changed to "[[Aliases Used in Prank Calls]]". I think we should change it to "Human characters" or something similar. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 31 March 2007
Minor humans
What about minor characters like the guitar player from for kids and the hot '60s looking girls and SBASAF personnel from space program? Do entries on this page have to have more prominent roles? 
Trey56 05:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- You could create a "minor characters" category. Retromaniac 22:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Biscuit Hands
If Biscuit Dough Hands Man has biscuits for hands, he wouldn't be CLEARLY a human, would he? Homestar-winner 11:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Page title
Is there something better than "Clearly human characters" that we could consider? I realize it's subtly different from "Human characters", but it just seems not-quite-right to me. — It's dot com 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I thought about that when I made Human characters as a redirect. It kinda reminds me of how "Obviously Phony Aliases" was changed to "Aliases Used in Prank Calls". I think we should change it to "Human characters" or something similar. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
