User talk:Tampo/sig

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
You have new messages.

um, this need sto be deleted. the thing just made it fo no reason. /Seriously (Talk) 19:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

No it doesn't. NO!!! PLEASE... DON'T SHOOT!!! Tampo (T/C) AND SOMEONE GET THiS FREAKiN CURSOR AWAY FROM ME!!!!! 22:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
How do you like this sig? Tampo talk edit this page 19:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
GREAT! --TheThin
19:42, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Do you think I should change my sig to that? NO!!! PLEASE... DON'T SHOOT!!! Tampo (T/C) AND SOMEONE GET THiS FREAKiN CURSOR AWAY FROM ME!!!!! 14:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
I would not recommend copying any user's work, as it just leads to complications. If you do, however, under the Creative Commons license, Thunderbird L17 must inform you on how to attribute the work to him, as this is obviously a cut-and-paste example of his signature. — Lapper (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Um... I didn't get a word you said. Seriously. NO!!! PLEASE... DON'T SHOOT!!! Tampo (T/C) AND SOMEONE GET THiS FREAKiN CURSOR AWAY FROM ME!!!!! 00:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
I think it means that you have to ask Thunderbird if it's OK to use his sig, and if you need to give credit to him for creating the signature style. --videlectrix.pngENUSY discussionitem_icon.gif user.gifmail_icon.gif 00:32, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
I changed it for the cool person of the month. I will change it back to the normal one (this one Tampo / (my talk) ) this Saturday. NO!!! PLEASE... DON'T SHOOT!!! Tampo (T/C) AND SOMEONE GET THiS FREAKiN CURSOR AWAY FROM ME!!!!! 22:38, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stop reverting

Look, you don't know that he would want his sig to look like that. He may want it differently. Plus it's his sig, let him fix it.--H*Bad 07:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

H*bad, it's really simple. 1) Sigs require a link to the home page. 2) His did not. 3) He colored his sig to match the standard color of a link. 4) The only difference between the current Tampo sig and the former Tampo sig is that it now complies with policy. What is the issue? Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 07:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The issue, is that he needs to fix it himself. Since you know it's his sig... but anyways, you don't know that he wants his sig like that. He may want it completly different that what you did.--H*Bad 07:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The issue is that the sig was not complying with the rules. It's used on many talk pages and needed to be fixed. If he wants it to look differently, then he can go and fix it later on. Loafing 07:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Look I don't like to debate, but how about you leave it alone and let him fix it.--H*Bad 07:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
My God, H*bad, what's to leave? If we reverted all changes to his sig back to his last edit, it would look he exact same, except now it links to his page, which complies with the rules! So what's the issue?? Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 08:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Please don't take this as me trying to debate you. All I am saying is that he needs to fix it.--H*Bad 08:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools