Category talk:Biscuitdoughhandsman Filmography

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Delete?

Not needed. Only three appearances, this page won't be undeleted anytime soon, so let's delete this crap. free 17:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Before we go on deleting categories, I think we need to establish what a minimum number of appearances are needed to have a category. Clearly consensus is that 2 isn't enough. What about 3? 4? 5? Personally, I think 3 is a good enough convention and matches the running gags minimum. --Stux 17:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Eh, I think that we should only use filmographies if characters' appearances don't fit easily on their own pages. So, I'd have to say about 5 should be the minimum. On the subject of Biscuitdoughhandsman, I looked in his page and he also appears in The current FAQ, rock opera, myths & legends, licensed and Baddest Of The Bands, they just hadn't been added to this list. So, I guess we can keep this. But yes, we need a guideline. free 17:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
We should put this on Bisc..man's page. Espemon333 00:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Wait, It is on his page! Delete this Cud-rap!

I think that with 8 appearances he should have his own filmography category. That's more then enough. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I want it kept, because I like the Biscuitdoughhandsman. 198.228.228.25 11:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I agree. Not that I like Biscuitsoughhandsman (he's kinda creepy looking), eight appearances is definitely enough. Personally, I think all characters should have a filmography- the more information on the wiki, the better.
--Image:Homsariconformysig.gifBroncoTroll 14:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I only see 5... — Defender1031*Talk 16:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
There are 8 appearances as Elcool mentioned they are listed in his article. However, 2 of them are mentions and the 3rd are FAQ eyes, so it's harder to say whether or not they should be added to this category. Nevertheless, I think 5 entries of this character are sufficient to warrant inclusion. I think that is a reasonable cut-off. --Stux 17:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Ah I see. I think I agree that 5 is a reasonable cutoff. (In fact, I seem to recall there being a similar discussion about a different character where the same conclusion was reached, but I can't seem to find that.) — Defender1031*Talk 18:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Found a couple of references to that, but I can't find a conclusive conversation where that was decided. Still, seems enough to indicate a trend applicable here. — Defender1031*Talk 18:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I think we should keep it. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:19, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I think we should keep it, too. - Catjaz63 18:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I think we should keep it! I think we should keep it! I think we should... *trails off* -- ■■   PURPLE  WRENCH   ■■ 21:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Keep. --Image:Homsariconformysig.gifBroncoTroll 21:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools