HRWiki talk:Introduction

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Adding a Guided Tour?)
(Adding a Guided Tour?: yes.)
Line 24: Line 24:
I [[Talk:Main_Page#Guided_Tour|posted]] a suggestion for [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=212214 inclusion] of the [[HRWiki:HRWiki_tour|Guided Tour]] page into this Introduction. I seems to have been missed, so I am posting it for better visibility. :) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I [[Talk:Main_Page#Guided_Tour|posted]] a suggestion for [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=212214 inclusion] of the [[HRWiki:HRWiki_tour|Guided Tour]] page into this Introduction. I seems to have been missed, so I am posting it for better visibility. :) --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 +
:I like that idea. {{User:Bubsty/sig}} 17:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 22 December 2005

Why is the "Experimental edits from our visitors..." section there? We already have a place for that. --Gafaddict 22:12, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

I'm wondering about that myself. It makes the page look bad. →FireBird
I agree. The first time I saw it on Recent Changes, I thought it was a troll edit. Maybe a link to The Sandbox would be better? --acekirby13|My Talk 23:58, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →FireBird
We're simply following the example of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit any page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit that page. Does that make sense? — wikisig.gif Joey (talk·edits) 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
I think a simple "You can edit this page as much as you want (in fact, you can edit any article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →FireBird|(Talk)
I agree, the Introduction page looks pretty bad with all that Sandbox crap. I think a link to Sandbox would suffice. Aurora the Homestar Coder 16:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
At the risk of starting a protect / unprotect war, I've unprotected this page and added a new header above the test edits. Again I would point you to Wikipedia's Introduction in support of keeping this page unprotected. I really think allowing users to make their first edit right here on this page is important to give them the feeling they are free here. Telling them they can edit any page and then not letting them edit this one seems a little counterintuitive. — wikisig.gif Joey (talk·edits) 00:11, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Only for a little while...

Just for the time being, shouldn't we put that you can only edit articles if you are logged in? I know you used to be able to do it, logged in or not, but for right now, shouldn't we just put that there? teeeffoh!

I think the note that appears at the top of every single page might give an idea of what's going on. I think that's enough, and the usual is what's described here. The note lets people know that its not the norm. -- Tom 20:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Adding a Guided Tour?

I posted a suggestion for inclusion of the Guided Tour page into this Introduction. I seems to have been missed, so I am posting it for better visibility. :) --Stux 02:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I like that idea. — talk Bubsty edits 17:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Personal tools