HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 16:09, 17 August 2009 by MHarrington (Talk | contribs)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 31 (Jul 27-Aug 2)
As stated from the previous week, we now should feature Strong Bad's Website. MHarrington 15:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, you stated it the week BEFORE the previous week. Seriously, though, it's a good idea. Theycallmefree 20:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 32 (Aug 3-9)
For this week, I was thinking of the Double Deuce. MHarrington 04:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- How about Doughnuts? It's had quite a bit of references, but the intro needs quite a bit of expansion. — MichaelXX2
14:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- The intro is far too short, nor do I think that it could be expanded beyond what it has. We're looking for toons, characters or major themes of the site. While Doughnuts show up in a lot of unusual ways, I don't think it makes a good FA. wbwolf (t | ed) 15:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh! I have a better one! First Time Here? is extremely important toon and gets constantly overlooked. It should be featured. wbwolf (t | ed) 15:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- First Time Here? seems like a good article. It's also VERY funny. "Homestarrunner.net:Its Dot Com!" Never gets old. free 20:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- And also, "Check me out! No, seriously, check me out." MHarrington 22:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- First Time Here? seems like a good article. It's also VERY funny. "Homestarrunner.net:Its Dot Com!" Never gets old. free 20:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 33 (Aug 10-16)
I still can't believe that G hasn't been featured yet. It's like, a healthy piece of real estate! --Darkangel 05:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- The big problem with the G article is it has very little prose and is mostly a list. It's a great theme, but it's not what a FA makes. wbwolf (t | ed) 05:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, and I'm not sure one could really expand it to the point it would be a good FA, though I'd be perfectly happy for someone to prove me wrong on that point. Unless and until someone does so, though, it's not a good choice. Heimstern Läufer
14:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, since it's being debated whether or not to do First Time Here for week 32, how about doing the article originally intended: the Double Deuce? MHarrington 20:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Since I upstaged the suggestion for Double D, I'll second featuring Double Deuce for this week. Great theme, and a lot of text for an intro. wbwolf (t | ed) 23:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I...one...two...Fifth it! For reasons stated above and beyond! Take it away, sig: free 00:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Since I upstaged the suggestion for Double D, I'll second featuring Double Deuce for this week. Great theme, and a lot of text for an intro. wbwolf (t | ed) 23:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, since it's being debated whether or not to do First Time Here for week 32, how about doing the article originally intended: the Double Deuce? MHarrington 20:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, and I'm not sure one could really expand it to the point it would be a good FA, though I'd be perfectly happy for someone to prove me wrong on that point. Unless and until someone does so, though, it's not a good choice. Heimstern Läufer