Talk:galvanized nails
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(hmm, I must have done something that caused it not to edit conflict.) |
(redirects are cheap) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Special:Search?ns0=1&search=galvanized%20nails searching for it] is very complicated. This can be outright deleted.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | ::I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Special:Search?ns0=1&search=galvanized%20nails searching for it] is very complicated. This can be outright deleted.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | :::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:57, 24 June 2008
Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in No Hands on Deck! - Qermaq - (T/C) 
01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, it might be wise to make galvanized nails link to No Hands on Deck!
Flashfight
01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like searching for it is very complicated. This can be outright deleted. Loafing
01:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. Heimstern Läufer
02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. Heimstern Läufer
- Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like searching for it is very complicated. This can be outright deleted. Loafing
