Talk:Strong Sad Cheering

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (moved Talk:Strong Sad cheering to Talk:Strong Sad Cheering: Though, it should have proper case.)
(Delete)
Line 4: Line 4:
So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon]] and should be '''deleted'''.  {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon]] and should be '''deleted'''.  {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
:On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be '''given time to develop before making a hasty decision'''. And that spoons essay is a [[User:Qermaq|single user's]] [[Spoons|outdated]] opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
:On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be '''given time to develop before making a hasty decision'''. And that spoons essay is a [[User:Qermaq|single user's]] [[Spoons|outdated]] opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 +
:: My biggest disagreement with the page is that one instance is an instance of the entire cast cheering. If there was a third instance that wasn't a crowd cheer, it would be more pageworthy IMHO. However, even then, it still doesn't strike me as notable or running-gag-like as the KoT booing. Provided you can find a better third instance than Funjob, I would find myself solidly neutral. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:10, 15 April 2012


Delete

So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a spoon and should be deleted. RickTommy (edits) 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be given time to develop before making a hasty decision. And that spoons essay is a single user's outdated opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". — Defender1031*Talk 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
My biggest disagreement with the page is that one instance is an instance of the entire cast cheering. If there was a third instance that wasn't a crowd cheer, it would be more pageworthy IMHO. However, even then, it still doesn't strike me as notable or running-gag-like as the KoT booing. Provided you can find a better third instance than Funjob, I would find myself solidly neutral. --Jay (Gobble) 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools