Talk:Strong Sad Cheering
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Strong Sad cheering to Talk:Strong Sad Cheering: Though, it should have proper case.) |
(→Delete) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon]] and should be '''deleted'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon]] and should be '''deleted'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
:On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be '''given time to develop before making a hasty decision'''. And that spoons essay is a [[User:Qermaq|single user's]] [[Spoons|outdated]] opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | :On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be '''given time to develop before making a hasty decision'''. And that spoons essay is a [[User:Qermaq|single user's]] [[Spoons|outdated]] opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: My biggest disagreement with the page is that one instance is an instance of the entire cast cheering. If there was a third instance that wasn't a crowd cheer, it would be more pageworthy IMHO. However, even then, it still doesn't strike me as notable or running-gag-like as the KoT booing. Provided you can find a better third instance than Funjob, I would find myself solidly neutral. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:10, 15 April 2012
Delete
So he cheers. Unlike The King of Town booing, however, it's not exactly unusual that he does so. Which means that to me, this page is a spoon and should be deleted. RickTommy (edits) 02:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- On first thought, I didn't think so, but then I looked and realized that strong sad's personality is not known for beeing cheerful (though I'm not sure the instance where everyone cheers counts.) In fact, I think that he's less likely to be cheerful than the king is to boo. I'm not necessarily in support of this page, but I think it should be given time to develop before making a hasty decision. And that spoons essay is a single user's outdated opinion of what should be iuncluded on the wiki, and not in any way policy. (It even has a disclaimer to that effect right at the top of the page.) Plus, it doesn't mean anything when you say "this article is a spoon". If you believe an article is just a list of occurences of an every day item then say "this article is just a list of occurences of an every day item". — Defender1031*Talk 04:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- My biggest disagreement with the page is that one instance is an instance of the entire cast cheering. If there was a third instance that wasn't a crowd cheer, it would be more pageworthy IMHO. However, even then, it still doesn't strike me as notable or running-gag-like as the KoT booing. Provided you can find a better third instance than Funjob, I would find myself solidly neutral. --Jay (Gobble) 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
