User talk:Mycroft.holmes
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→So Negative...) |
(→So Negative...) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Any reason as to why you never vote accept in STUFF arguments? --[[User:Jnelson09|Jnelson09]] 02:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | Any reason as to why you never vote accept in STUFF arguments? --[[User:Jnelson09|Jnelson09]] 02:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Funny, come to think of it I rarely do either. Can't speak for Mycroft, but in my case I find most STUFFED facts to be lacking in some way, usually speculation or TTATOT. I must be more conservative than other users, I suppose. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | :Funny, come to think of it I rarely do either. Can't speak for Mycroft, but in my case I find most STUFFED facts to be lacking in some way, usually speculation or TTATOT. I must be more conservative than other users, I suppose. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
::Couldn't have said it better myself.--[[User:Mycroft.holmes|Mycroft Holmes]] 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ::Couldn't have said it better myself.--[[User:Mycroft.holmes|Mycroft Holmes]] 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:37, 2 January 2007
Archive
So Negative...
Any reason as to why you never vote accept in STUFF arguments? --Jnelson09 02:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, come to think of it I rarely do either. Can't speak for Mycroft, but in my case I find most STUFFED facts to be lacking in some way, usually speculation or TTATOT. I must be more conservative than other users, I suppose. - Qermaq - (T/C)
02:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Couldn't have said it better myself.--Mycroft Holmes 03:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
