HRWiki talk:Introduction
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Explaining why I unlocked it.) |
(Only for a little while...) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:At the risk of starting a protect / unprotect war, I've unprotected this page and added a new header above the test edits. Again I would point you to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction|Wikipedia's Introduction]] in support of keeping this page unprotected. I really think allowing users to make their first edit ''right here on this page'' is important to give them the feeling they are free here. Telling them they can edit ''any'' page and then not letting them edit ''this one'' seems a little counterintuitive. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 00:11, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC) | :At the risk of starting a protect / unprotect war, I've unprotected this page and added a new header above the test edits. Again I would point you to [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction|Wikipedia's Introduction]] in support of keeping this page unprotected. I really think allowing users to make their first edit ''right here on this page'' is important to give them the feeling they are free here. Telling them they can edit ''any'' page and then not letting them edit ''this one'' seems a little counterintuitive. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 00:11, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Only for a little while... == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just for the time being, shouldn't we put that you can only edit articles if you are logged in? I know you used to be able to do it, logged in or not, but for right now, shouldn't we just put that there? {{User:Teh Frossty One/sig}} |
Revision as of 19:39, 13 November 2005
Why is the "Experimental edits from our visitors..." section there? We already have a place for that. --Gafaddict 22:12, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- I'm wondering about that myself. It makes the page look bad. →FireBird
- I agree. The first time I saw it on Recent Changes, I thought it was a troll edit. Maybe a link to The Sandbox would be better? --acekirby13|My Talk 23:58, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →FireBird
- We're simply following the example of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit any page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit that page. Does that make sense? —
Joey (talk·edits) 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
- We're simply following the example of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit any page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit that page. Does that make sense? —
- I agree, the Introduction page looks pretty bad with all that Sandbox crap. I think a link to Sandbox would suffice. Aurora the Homestar Coder 16:46, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- At the risk of starting a protect / unprotect war, I've unprotected this page and added a new header above the test edits. Again I would point you to Wikipedia's Introduction in support of keeping this page unprotected. I really think allowing users to make their first edit right here on this page is important to give them the feeling they are free here. Telling them they can edit any page and then not letting them edit this one seems a little counterintuitive. —
Joey (talk·edits) 00:11, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Only for a little while...
Just for the time being, shouldn't we put that you can only edit articles if you are logged in? I know you used to be able to do it, logged in or not, but for right now, shouldn't we just put that there? ♥ teeeffoh!