Talk:Magazine Sightings

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Proper Usage of "namely": Go-go Polly-writer!)
(Game Informer)
Line 10: Line 10:
:That whole section could use a rewrite.  Go for it.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:37, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
:That whole section could use a rewrite.  Go for it.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]]  --  [[User:Tom|Tom]] 15:37, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Game Informer==
 +
There are three entries for "Game Informer," and they have said "review" for several months now. Every now and then, someone will change it to "preview." Since they're so old, I have changed it back&mdash;at least for now. Does anyone have any specific information (and can cite their sources) on these? &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:29, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:29, 16 September 2005

For the love of Mike, someone in a Tshirt is not a notable sighting. Nor are words that end in 'D - Dr Haggis - Talk 02:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

That Sighting is hilarious. Not because it's a good sighting, but because I just talked to Amanda Seybold five minutes ago and I just now read that sighting. Aurora the Homestar Coder 02:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Proper Usage of "namely"

... featured a picture of Homestar from Where's The Cheat?, and said he was part of a funny cartoon website, namely homestarrunner.com.

That's from the Time Magazine sighting. I'm not entirely sure about the usage of the word "namely," but it seems to me that it should be omitted in the above sentence. But I might be wrong. So somebody with a more thorough understanding of the grammatical whims of this language should fix it, if indeed it needs fixing. -Polly 15:29, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

That whole section could use a rewrite. Go for it. -- Tom 15:37, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Game Informer

There are three entries for "Game Informer," and they have said "review" for several months now. Every now and then, someone will change it to "preview." Since they're so old, I have changed it back—at least for now. Does anyone have any specific information (and can cite their sources) on these? — It's dot com 01:29, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Personal tools