Talk:Mystery Science Theater 3000

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(deleted article, changed template)
(discuss again)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{deletedtalk}}
+
{{ttbd}}
== Keep? ==
== Keep? ==
Line 13: Line 13:
::::Not notable. -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 23:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Not notable. -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 23:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::It's now deleted. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::It's now deleted. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 +
Another person created the page, with a second clear reference. I don't think it's enough for a page, unless we think "rando" is a deliberate reference. Anyway, I wanted to run it through another discussion before deleting it. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:03, 7 September 2009


Keep?

"Rando" looks too generic to me. There's only one clear reference. Besides, even if "Rando" is a MST3K reference, that's still only two. We don't make pages for everything that has been mentioned twice, do we? --Jay (Gobble) 22:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No, and TBC have a knack for taking a few letters out of words to make ones that are about the same, so "rando" probably isn't a reference. If there is any support to keep this page, then we also need to clean it up. The page (no offense, creator) looks just awful. DevonM(talk·cont-ribs) 22:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Unless there are more refs, this page isn't really a keeper. Heimstern Läufer 22:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Doing a quick search in the Wiki, there is one other tenuous ref (the pronunciation of "mut-ant" from space program), plus a couple mentions of influence in interviews. I also agree that the bit about rando is weak. As much as I love MST3k, I think this page needs to be deleted. wbwolf (t | ed) 23:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This is way too little references to meet the page standard for a real-life show page. Delete. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Leave the content of this page on the Real World References of the toons it was in. Something like this would have to be mentioned quite a few more times to warrant its own page. -Brightstar Shiner 16:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Not enough. Currently, the rando issue is one of our many unanswered questions for the Chaps. Until then, delete. – The Chort 21:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Not notable. -DAGRON 23:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
It's now deleted. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 21:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Another person created the page, with a second clear reference. I don't think it's enough for a page, unless we think "rando" is a deliberate reference. Anyway, I wanted to run it through another discussion before deleting it. — It's dot com 20:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools