Talk:Food Still In Peel or Package
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (what aren't you sure about?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Well, it's definitely a running gag, which should be chronicled. And it's likely that it will grow as time goes on. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | Well, it's definitely a running gag, which should be chronicled. And it's likely that it will grow as time goes on. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not sure about this. A name change. Like '''Un-opened Food Items''' or something.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | :I'm not sure about this. A name change. Like '''Un-opened Food Items''' or something.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| - | + | ::anyways, shouldn't it be in the food and drink category?--{{User:Benol/sig}} 02:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC) | |
| + | :What aren't you sure about? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] | ||
Revision as of 02:20, 24 November 2005
I don't know about anyone else, but this page seems pointless to me. There's just nothing to it. I don't see the need for a page that lists about 4 items of food with a "peel or packet". Anyone else agree? Homestramy20|Talk 02:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- agreed--
Benol, aka Coach B 02:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Well, it's definitely a running gag, which should be chronicled. And it's likely that it will grow as time goes on. — It's dot com 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this. A name change. Like Un-opened Food Items or something.--
Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 02:18, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- anyways, shouldn't it be in the food and drink category?-- Benol, aka Coach B 02:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- anyways, shouldn't it be in the food and drink category?--
- What aren't you sure about? — It's dot com
