Talk:The King of Town's Sheep
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Rogue Leader (Talk | contribs) |
(Delete it) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
These are in The KOTs Character video and his DVD. We should keep it. {{User:Rogue Leader.sig}} | These are in The KOTs Character video and his DVD. We should keep it. {{User:Rogue Leader.sig}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | IF we keep this, the title should be "The King of Town's Sheep. However, this page is absolutely worthless, there is no content on it that has been shown elsewhere. --[[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]] 15:47, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:47, 11 July 2005
this page is dumb..i vote we take it off
- Well, I think this page is fine. The sheep have appeared multiple times and played a noticeable part in one toon (KOT). Maybe it should be moved to "Sheep" or "The Sheep" though. Aurora the Homestar Coder 17:24, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- the problem i have with it is it doesnt really tell me anything new (all the info is found on other pages)..but then again there more informative than marzimpans purse/stalker spray...now thoses pages suck
- Well, you could also argue that all the content on Strong Bad is contained on other pages. I think since the Sheep turn up in more than one place, it's legit. Aurora the Homestar Coder 18:47, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I agree (its what i do) -- Tony Stony
There is really no reason to delete anything from the site, Everything H*R should be posted here, and the sheep are a major part of the Kings story, (Unregistered at the moment user, Loop)
Just delete and combine with King of Town. -Kinsey
Let's just take it off. I mean, come on. It's made pretty much ONE appearance. not important. -Tapd260
I really don't care what we do with this. But it would be a good Idea to change the title or something. Even though "Some Sheep" sounds kinda funny. --Darklinkskywalker 21:54, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)
These are in The KOTs Character video and his DVD. We should keep it. User:Rogue Leader.sig
IF we keep this, the title should be "The King of Town's Sheep. However, this page is absolutely worthless, there is no content on it that has been shown elsewhere. --Gafaddict 15:47, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)