Talk:Strong Bad claiming to be awesome

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
This is the talk page of a deleted article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

So, I thought this might be worth documenting... It's kinda like blatant lies, but the distinction is that it focuses on this one specific type. Also, it could include the cases in which the claim isn't explicitly contradicted (except by our preexisting knowledge of Strong Bad's "grandiose" tendencies) - 18:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure there's already a page like this in need of a rename, something like Strong Bad being Lame. I can't find it, though. Dr. Clash 20:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Is this page even needed? I mean this is just a Running Gag. This should be Moved or Deleted.--- User:Record307

Yes I agree, which is why I put the "To Be Discussed" template on the article. I seriously think this is a nonsense page. has done many edits and should be promted to create an account. made this page. Adding the TBD template will alert all sysops. —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 03:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I think nonsense page is the wrong word. Granted, content hasn't been added yet, and even if it had, the necessity of documentation is debatable, but it's not nonsense. (BTW, I'm 132whatever; I have a non-static IP. I do have an account, but I haven't logged into it lately.) - 08:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I say this page should just redirect to Strong Bad being lame, while that page gets a new name. Dr. Clash 14:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah when I said nonsense, I meant it doesen't seem like an appreciated page, and it does not showcase an imporntant part of the Wiki. Basically, it is no help. So, redirect it is then? —Mas12806 (talk·contribs) 16:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
But it's not the same as Strong Bad being lame. The intended subject of the page is pretty much the opposite. Thus the suggested redirect would not be useful. - 19:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC) ETA: It's more closely related to the other see also page currently listed, in which Strong Bad exaggerates himself. - 02:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
For the record, I'm actually more comfortable with this page than Strong Bad being lame, as the latter is kind of subjective. I don't see any reason to delete this just yet (mind, content would help a lot.) --Jay (Talk) 04:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I think that before we even discuss about whether this article should stay, someone must put in some occurrences so we can get an idea about the scope of the article. Right now it's a little silly to discuss what could be a very long article with no content. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

With no examples of the purported theme/gag after quite some time, this article doesn't really have a leg to stand on, and I've deleted it. Heimstern Läufer 12:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Aw, I hadn't had time to add content, yet. Oh, well, it's understandable. I'll wait until I get a chance to flesh out the content before I revive it. - 15:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools