Template talk:delete
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(My take) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (fixi) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? | + | I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? {{User:Gafaddict/sig}} 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC) |
:I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | :I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) | ::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:38, 2 May 2007
I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? —Gafaddict (Talk | Contribs.) 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --Stux 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus. -- Tom 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with Gafaddict. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. —Supuhstar*
- If a troll marked a bunch of pages like that, it would be rather easy to tell. Plus, we might just make it inaccessable to anon IPs so that won't happen as much, so I stand for the proposal. -Brightstar Shiner 16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ummm... isn't THIS the template for speedy deletion? I mean, for a deleted page that needs a wiki consensus, like if someone thinks Strong Bad Email should be deleted (Which it won't be, but, we're playing pretend), we generally use Template:tobedeleted. If a troll makes a page entitled "THE WIKI WILL DIE!!!@!@!11", we tag it with {{delete|Troll page}}, that way, sysops and the like can delete it immediately. Bluebry 16:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- If a troll marked a bunch of pages like that, it would be rather easy to tell. Plus, we might just make it inaccessable to anon IPs so that won't happen as much, so I stand for the proposal. -Brightstar Shiner 16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Gafaddict. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. —Supuhstar*
- The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus. -- Tom 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)