Talk:Van Mundegaarde

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Watchlist)
Line 32: Line 32:
==Watchlist==
==Watchlist==
How did this wind up on my watchlist, anyway? Is it a copy of the Sandbox or somethin'? --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 00:57, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
How did this wind up on my watchlist, anyway? Is it a copy of the Sandbox or somethin'? --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 00:57, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
-
 
:Yeah, the Sandbox was moved here and back. Why would you watch the Sandbox? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:02, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
:Yeah, the Sandbox was moved here and back. Why would you watch the Sandbox? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 01:02, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::I have my reasons. --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 01:06, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::I have my reasons. --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 01:06, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
-
 
:::Okay, I'll bite. What's the reason? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]]
:::Okay, I'll bite. What's the reason? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]]
-
 
+
::::Well, if you must know, I like to use the Sandbox to express complete and utter randomness; thus if I can catch something in which I can add on to, I have a tendency to. Or, to know when its cleared, or, to know when some fool actually removed <nowiki>{{sandbox}}</nowiki> and when it has to be put back on... et cetera.
 +
::::Satisfied? :) --[[User:Shadow Hog|Shadow Hog]] 01:40, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
==Is necessary==
==Is necessary==

Revision as of 01:40, 24 July 2005


Not necessary

Van Mundegaarde was a one-email throwaway joke. He does not need a page of his own. — It's dot com 00:54, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Every charachter deserves his own page jerk! -Thechamp
Excuse me, but why would you call me that? — It's dot com
And I don't stink. That insult was completely unoriginal. User:Rogue Leader.sig
"Thechamp" (24.62.243.222) is a problematic user who blanked montage and Strong Bad Email a few days ago. He doesn't hold much weight here. —BazookaJoe 01:06, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Ah. Well, I had an eloquent, more-detailed argument prepared for why this page should go, but I guess I will postpone. — It's dot com 01:08, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC):::::Listen Rogue Leader, Please don't take my past exp. on this site as what I am like in real life, it was an accident. I left a link apology/responce! -Thechamp
I realize the spelling mistakes.
K, Champ. I won't User:Rogue Leader.sig
Sorry, "Thechamp", but the wiki's trust in you has already been violated. It is hard to believe you blanking 2 pages and insulting other members is an accident. Even though you apoligized, actions speak louder than words. —BazookaJoe 01:18, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
You too BazookaJoe, the same message as Rogueleader. -Thechamp
I promise too follow the rules better, BazookaJoe, I will realy try. If you can find some way for me to redeem myself to you guys, I will be happy to do so. -Thechamp
I would be willing to forgive you, but if you troll again, you will get a very long ban. User:Rogue Leader.sig
Thanks Rogue Leader.-Thechamp
Here's what you do to make it up: make quality edits, make good, clean arguments on talk pages, and never ever insult other users. Over time, the wound will heal, though probably never completely. By the way, if you want your own user page, you are going to have to register an account first an use that. (Click the link in the very top-right corner of the page.) —BazookaJoe 01:35, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Watchlist

How did this wind up on my watchlist, anyway? Is it a copy of the Sandbox or somethin'? --Shadow Hog 00:57, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, the Sandbox was moved here and back. Why would you watch the Sandbox? — It's dot com 01:02, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I have my reasons. --Shadow Hog 01:06, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Okay, I'll bite. What's the reason? — It's dot com
Well, if you must know, I like to use the Sandbox to express complete and utter randomness; thus if I can catch something in which I can add on to, I have a tendency to. Or, to know when its cleared, or, to know when some fool actually removed {{sandbox}} and when it has to be put back on... et cetera.
Satisfied? :) --Shadow Hog 01:40, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Is necessary

Every charachter deserves his own page, evan if they aren't later included! — Thechamp 00:54, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

No, they don't, and Van is barely a character User:Rogue Leader.sig
Why do you say that? -Thechamp
Like It's Dot com said, he was a throw away gag that was only mentioned once in the whole website. User:Rogue Leader.sig
Hey, if there's a page on Bub's shotgun, which will probably never be seen again, why should'nt there be a page on Van?
I agree with the shotgum dude up there^ why not! -Thechamp
[Edit Confict] This isn't really a character. Everything about him is included in the transcript of 2 years. He was just a gag. He has never been referred to before, and there's no reason to believe he will ever be again. Other than his being Strong Bad's "main man" we don't know anything about him. What does he look like? What are his traits? There is not enough for an article here. — It's dot com 01:18, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, I geuss it would be ok to say that, It's dot com. If you don't mind, could you put this article's stuff in the e-mail page, I would most apprichiate it. Yeah...Sp mistakes. -Thechamp
Van only appeared once on the site, but so have many other things that have pages. So why not? User:68.155.18.51
I like you, would it be safe to call you a friend? User:24.62.243.222

Yes.

K, Bazookajoe, I will be the best dern edditer and argewer evew! Thanks for the forgivness, and I don't mean to be a bad dude, man. -Thechamp

Personal tools