Talk:Strong Bad and Coach Z's Relationship
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Inclusion?: clarify) |
(→Inclusion?: keep) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::3 does not cut it. '''Delort'''! {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | ::::3 does not cut it. '''Delort'''! {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::I'd be interested to see what we come up with on this. My immediate inclination is to think this topic is worth inclusion, but I'd need to see the final product to be sure. '''Hold off on deletion.''' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | :::::I'd be interested to see what we come up with on this. My immediate inclination is to think this topic is worth inclusion, but I'd need to see the final product to be sure. '''Hold off on deletion.''' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::Solid '''keep''' after expansion. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:17, 7 November 2007
Inclusion?
Look, SB and Coach Z don't interact much, off the top of my head, I can think of about four noteable interactions, and because of that, I vote that we delete it.--~ SlipStream 07:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- So, I started the page, and as my discussion at the category talk page goes, it's that I think it could be potentially interesting. As to why it could be interesting, well, I'll expound. I agree that characters that rarely interact should not have an relationship page, but I don't think this one is quite that rare. Further, I think the interesting thing about relationship pages is that they highlight significant variations from the norm. For example, Strong Bad and Marzipan interact less rarely, but the interactions have very few deviations from "Strong Bad *annoy or prank* Marzipan: I really don't like 'im at all." I think there are at least a few examples of SB's interactions with Coach Z, however, to be dynamic. Does that make any sense? Anyway, I guess I should also say that consensus seems to be that "three instances" of an occurance warrants a new page, and the poster above me claims that there are at least 4, so that's reason to keep it, in my opinion. 134.174.140.208 01:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- If there really are "four noteable interactions", please name them and explain why they are notable. – The Chort 21:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can come up with 3, so far, myself. I put up two already, I'll put up the third after class. Also, you came off as rather condescending. It's unnecessary. 134.174.140.208 21:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- 3 does not cut it. Delort!
Sam the Man
21:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'd be interested to see what we come up with on this. My immediate inclination is to think this topic is worth inclusion, but I'd need to see the final product to be sure. Hold off on deletion. Heimstern Läufer
21:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Solid keep after expansion. Heimstern Läufer
05:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Solid keep after expansion. Heimstern Läufer
- I'd be interested to see what we come up with on this. My immediate inclination is to think this topic is worth inclusion, but I'd need to see the final product to be sure. Hold off on deletion. Heimstern Läufer
- 3 does not cut it. Delort!
- I can come up with 3, so far, myself. I put up two already, I'll put up the third after class. Also, you came off as rather condescending. It's unnecessary. 134.174.140.208 21:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- If there really are "four noteable interactions", please name them and explain why they are notable. – The Chort 21:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)