Talk:Smoldering

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(reply)
(smoldering *crater* might work)
Line 3: Line 3:
I don't think there's anything too unusual about the way Strong Bad uses the word ''smoldering'', and thus it's not notable enough for an article, despite four appearances. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think there's anything too unusual about the way Strong Bad uses the word ''smoldering'', and thus it's not notable enough for an article, despite four appearances. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
:I'm kinda torn.  On the one hand, it's used gratuitously and unusually like [[style]], but on the other hand, it is not that unusual to refer something burning as "smoldering".  And we all know how Strong Bad likes [[explosions]].  The "smoldering pile of money" is probably the oddest usage of the four.  {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
:I'm kinda torn.  On the one hand, it's used gratuitously and unusually like [[style]], but on the other hand, it is not that unusual to refer something burning as "smoldering".  And we all know how Strong Bad likes [[explosions]].  The "smoldering pile of money" is probably the oddest usage of the four.  {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
-
::I agree that smoldering money is unusual, but describing craters (especially ones created from recent explosions) and other things that are on fire as being smoldering is proper usage, and as such don't really count in my mind toward establishing a documentable pattern. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
+
::I agree that smoldering money is unusual, but describing craters (especially ones created from recent explosions) and other things that are on fire as being smoldering is proper usage, and as such don't really count in my mind toward establishing a documentable pattern. "Smoldering ''crater''" might work, but there's only two appearances. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 05:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:28, 21 May 2008

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Inclusion

I don't think there's anything too unusual about the way Strong Bad uses the word smoldering, and thus it's not notable enough for an article, despite four appearances. — It's dot com 05:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm kinda torn. On the one hand, it's used gratuitously and unusually like style, but on the other hand, it is not that unusual to refer something burning as "smoldering". And we all know how Strong Bad likes explosions. The "smoldering pile of money" is probably the oddest usage of the four. wbwolf (t | ed) 05:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree that smoldering money is unusual, but describing craters (especially ones created from recent explosions) and other things that are on fire as being smoldering is proper usage, and as such don't really count in my mind toward establishing a documentable pattern. "Smoldering crater" might work, but there's only two appearances. — It's dot com 05:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Smoldering"
Personal tools