Talk:Sam & Max Season Two Alternate Ending 101
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) (Agree) |
(disagree with this argument) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If we keep the article about this, we might have to transcribe [[Sightings|every single toon and video]] that includes a Homestar character cameo. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 19:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | If we keep the article about this, we might have to transcribe [[Sightings|every single toon and video]] that includes a Homestar character cameo. {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 19:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. Despite the Telltale connection, a Sighting is a Sighting, and shouldn't go in the main namespace. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | :I agree. Despite the Telltale connection, a Sighting is a Sighting, and shouldn't go in the main namespace. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::I don't think this is a good argument at all. [[Sightings]] consists almost entirely of non-canon appearances; i.e., references to Homestar Runner by others with no involvement from TBC. This, by contrast, seems to be legit TBC material. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:06, 24 July 2008
If we keep the article about this, we might have to transcribe every single toon and video that includes a Homestar character cameo. BBG 19:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Despite the Telltale connection, a Sighting is a Sighting, and shouldn't go in the main namespace. --DorianGray 20:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a good argument at all. Sightings consists almost entirely of non-canon appearances; i.e., references to Homestar Runner by others with no involvement from TBC. This, by contrast, seems to be legit TBC material. Heimstern Läufer 20:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)