Talk:Predictions

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 00:44, 7 February 2009

I'm thinking this is a spoon. Everyone makes predictions. It's a natural part of living. And categorizing every time a prediction has made on the site would be practically impossible. Plus, it's orphaned. —Guard Duck ^talk 05:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I think the concept is quite similar to History According to Strong Bad. BBG 05:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Though more in a "The Future According to Strong Bad" sense. --DorianGray 06:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

If it weren't for the paper prediction, this list would indeed not be very interesting. However, one of the predictions has come true, and so I believe it's worthwhile keeping the article. Loafing 10:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

This article is just a rehash of History according to Strong Bad, except not as well written. A redirect seems appropiate here. – The Chort 15:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I kinda thing the history according to strong bad article is really poorly written, actually. I'd avoid redirecting there if at all possible.. -128.103.10.17 15:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

If it's so poorly written, why is it a Featured Article? BBG 23:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Couldn't tell you. It definitely shouldn't have been, imo. -132.183.151.187 00:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I still feel that History according to Strong Bad is better written than this article, which covers the same ground. We could always just delete it instead. – The Chort 19:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

How is this a rehash of the history according to Strong Bad? Predictions includes two predictions that Strong Bad did not make - for example the one about the paper. Loafing 21:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I kind of like this page. Keep and cleanup. — MichaelXX2 21:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)