Talk:Killing Dogs
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 04:31, 12 November 2008 by DorianGray (Talk | contribs)
3 instances is not "many". This article shouldn't be here. Bub 04:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Three instances is the usual minimum for such an article. And it's a notable thing too. Loafing
04:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with Bubs though... But since it has three examples and all, I suppose it's okay. If this article is going to stay, can someone at least change the name..."Hurting dogs" or something... It just doesn't sit right with me the way it is currently... kai lyn 04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't mind the article as it is, but you people want it, it will be fine to merge it as a new header in Dogs. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. Loafing
- That's a wicked good idea. (By the way, I meant to say "Bub" before... I'm tired, and going to bed riiiiight nooooowwww... *(yawn)* Nighty night all! Pleasant wiki-ing! (Can't wait for tomorrow's Sbemail!) kai lyn 04:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. It's an activity running gag that is likely to be referenced again. Being in a new header in Dogs would not be smart (to me) because it would lose it's "running gag" category. No merge. TheYellowDart—(t/c)
- That's a wicked good idea. (By the way, I meant to say "Bub" before... I'm tired, and going to bed riiiiight nooooowwww... *(yawn)* Nighty night all! Pleasant wiki-ing! (Can't wait for tomorrow's Sbemail!) kai lyn 04:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. Loafing
- I don't mind the article as it is, but you people want it, it will be fine to merge it as a new header in Dogs. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with Bubs though... But since it has three examples and all, I suppose it's okay. If this article is going to stay, can someone at least change the name..."Hurting dogs" or something... It just doesn't sit right with me the way it is currently... kai lyn 04:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Li'l Brudder
Does Li'l Brudder deserve mention? 72.75.6.40 02:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think so — at very least in a "See also" section. Good idea.
Trey56 03:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Why? He's not dead, and nobody tried to kill him. I simply don't see any connection at all. Loafing 03:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm not saying there's enough connection to list it in the appearances section, but in the bold part of the lead paragraph it includes "hurting dogs", and I figured it wasn't unreasonable to think of Li'l Brudder as a "hurt dog". But I see what you're saying about him having nothing to do with "killing dogs". Trey56 03:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, hurting dogs. That makes more sense. Do we actually see him getting hurt on a toon? We know he was born this way, so he didn't lose his legs in an accident. Loafing 04:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, that's true. I forgot that it was specified that he was born that way — I'll remove it. Trey56 04:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- At one point, the woman kicks his leg out from under him, saddening him. He gets his feelings hurt, at any rate. That's all I can think of... --DorianGray 04:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I just watched The Li'l Brudder Show, and he's being treated mean! They even make him walk the plank. Loafing 04:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I just watched The Li'l Brudder Show, and he's being treated mean! They even make him walk the plank. Loafing
- At one point, the woman kicks his leg out from under him, saddening him. He gets his feelings hurt, at any rate. That's all I can think of... --DorianGray 04:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, that's true. I forgot that it was specified that he was born that way — I'll remove it.
- Ah, yes, hurting dogs. That makes more sense. Do we actually see him getting hurt on a toon? We know he was born this way, so he didn't lose his legs in an accident. Loafing
- Oh, I'm not saying there's enough connection to list it in the appearances section, but in the bold part of the lead paragraph it includes "hurting dogs", and I figured it wasn't unreasonable to think of Li'l Brudder as a "hurt dog". But I see what you're saying about him having nothing to do with "killing dogs".
- Why? He's not dead, and nobody tried to kill him. I simply don't see any connection at all. Loafing
Reciprocal appearance
Does anyone else think it would be appropriate to mention in this article the time in business trip when Homestar and Strong Bad were talking about how their dogs were killing them? MenacingBanjo 03:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it fits, as it's simply slang for "my feet hurt". --DorianGray 04:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
